European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 274–278 | Cite as

Clinical reduction of S. mutans in pre-school children using a novel liquorice root extract lollipop: a pilot study

  • M. C. PetersEmail author
  • J. A. Tallman
  • T. M. Braun
  • J. J. Jacobson


AIM: To determine the clinical effect of a simple herbal caries-prevention protocol aimed at reduction of Streptococcus mutans (SM) in young children in a pre-school setting. STUDY DESIGN: Proof-of-principle pilot study. METHODS: To prove the concept this pilot study delivered a clinical intervention using sugar-free lollipops containing liquorice root extract. Regimen: Supervised herbal lollipops, twice daily for 3 weeks. Species-specific monoclonal antibody testing of saliva provided SM counts. Children were grouped in high, medium and low caries-risk using baseline SM-levels as risk-indicator. Bacterial numbers at baseline, during intervention, and for 9 weeks post-intervention were compared. STATISTICS: SM levels were analysed using GEE modelling. RESULTS: High-risk children showed the steepest early decrease in mean log-SM (P<. 001). At end of a follow-up period, the log-SM decrease moved the high-risk group down to moderate-risk level. High-risk children showed a decrease in fitted mean SM% not seen in other groups (P<. 001). The decrease reached a nadir around 22-days post-intervention. Twice-daily use of herbal lollipop significantly reduced both number and relative percent of SM in high-risk children. SM numbers were reduced for 22 days after the last lollipop, stabilized and then began to rebound. CONCLUSION: A potential for simple effective caries-prevention for high-risk children has been demonstrated. Encouraging results warrant randomised clinical trials (RCT) of liquorice root in herbal lollipops or alternative modes of delivery.

Key words

Streptococcus mutans antibacterial agent dental caries early childhood caries 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ACF Administration for Children and Families Head Start Roadmap. Rockville, MD, USA Department of Health and Human Services, 2010.Google Scholar
  2. CDC Centers for Disease Control. Percentage of children aged 2–4 years who ever had caries in primary teeth. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Jan 23, 2009.Google Scholar
  3. Fitzgerald RJ, Keyes PH. Demonstration of the etiologic role of streptococci in experimental caries in the hamster. J Amer Dent Assoc,1960; 671:9–19.Google Scholar
  4. Grindefjord M, Dahllof G, Modeer T. Caries development in children from 2.5 to 3.5 years of age: A longitudinal study. Caries Res, 1995;29:449–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gu F, Lux R, Anderson MH, et al. Analyses of streptococcus mutans in saliva with species-specific monoclonal antibodies. Hybridoma and Hybridomics, 2002;21:225–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. He J, Chen L, Heber D, Shi W, Lu Q. Antibacterial compounds from glycyrrhiza uralensis. J Nat Prod, 2006;69:121–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hu C, He J, Eckat et al. Development evaluation of a safe and effective sugar-free herba; lollipop that kills cavity-causing bacteria. Int. J. Oral Sci 2011;3(1).Google Scholar
  8. Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 1986;73:13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Loesche WJ, Rowan J, Straffon LH, Loos PJ. Association of Streptococcus mutans with human dental decay. Infect Immunol, 1975;11:1252–1260.Google Scholar
  10. McCarney R, Warner J, Iliffe S, et al. The Hawthorne Effect: A randomised, controlled trial. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2007;7:30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MDCH Michigan Department of Community Health. 2005 Michigan Medicaid Data, 3–5 year olds. Lansing, MI, Michigan Department of Community Health, 2005.Google Scholar
  12. NIDCR National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. Oral Health in America: A report of the surgeon general. Rockville, MD, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 2000.Google Scholar
  13. ODPHP Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2010 (Vols. I and II) Publication ID: B0087. Office of Public Health and Science, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. Pienihakkinen K, Jokela J, Alanen P (2004) Assessment of caries risk in preschool children. Caries Res, 2004;38:156–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. R Development Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2008.Google Scholar
  16. Schmidt B. Proof of principle studies. Epilepsy Res., 2006;68:48–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Siegal MD, Yeager MS, Davis A. Oral health status and access to dental care for Ohio Head Start children. Pediatr Dent, 2004;26:519–525.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Thenisch NL, Bachmann LM, Imfeld T,et al. Are mutans streptococci detected in preschool children a reliable predictive factor for dental caries risk? A systematic review. Caries Res, 2006;40:366–374.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Twetman S, Fontana M. Patient caries risk assessment. Monogr Oral Sci, 2009;21:91–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. C. Peters
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. A. Tallman
    • 3
  • T. M. Braun
    • 2
  • J. J. Jacobson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, School of DentistryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.School of Public HealthUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  3. 3.Dental Research and Data InstituteDelta Dental of MI, OH, INOkemosUSA

Personalised recommendations