Abstract
AIM: This was to evaluate the influence of two methods of tooth-isolation on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in the primary molars. METHODS: The study was conducted in two rural divisions in Kenya, with 7 operators randomly paired to a group of 8 assistants. A total of 804 children each had one proximal cavity in a primary molar restored using the ART approach. During restorations 2 isolation methods, rubber dam or cotton wool rolls, and 3 brands of glass ionomer cements were used by the operators. The restorations were then followed for a period of 2 years. STATISTICS: SPSS 14.0 was used to analyse and relate the data obtained to the method of isolation used. RESULTS: After 2 years 30.8% of the ART restorations had survived. Higher survival rates of the restorations were obtained when using rubber dam irrespective of the GIC material or the operator. CONCLUSION: Generally the survival rate of the proximal restorations in the present study was very low, but the use of rubber dam resulted in a higher survival rate of the restorations.
References
Barghi N, Knight GT, Berry TG. Comparing two methods of moisture control and composite bonding to enamel: A clinical study. Oper Dent 1991;16:130–5.
Cohen A Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological measurement 1960; 20(1):37–46).
Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ. Atraumatic restorative treatment for dental caries, 1999, ISBN 90 804110 27.
Frencken JE, Holmgren C, Mikx F. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) for tooth decay: a global initiative 1998–2000.
Compact Cassette. Grossman ES, Mackenautsch S. Microscopic observations of ART excavated cavities and restorations. SADJ, 2002;57:359–63.
Honkala E, Behbehani J, Ibricevic H, Kerosuo E, Al-Jame G. Comparable survival rate of class I ART in primary dentition (GIC and Amalgam) in Beirut after 2 years of follow-up. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003;13(3):172–79.
Kemoli AM, van Amerongen WE, Opinya G. Influence of the experience of operator and assistant on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations: two-year results. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 2009;10(4):227–32.
Knight GT, Berry TG, Barghi N et al. Effects of the two methods of moisture control on marginal microleakage between resin composite and etched enamel: a clinical study. Inter J Prosthodont 1993;6:475–79.
Raskin A, Setcos JC, Vreven J, Wilson NHF. Influence of the isolation method on the 10-year clinical behaviour of posterior resin composite restorations. Clinical Oral Invest 2000; 4(3):148–52.
Roeleveld AC, van Amerongen WE, Mandari GJ. Influence of residual caries and cervical gaps on the survival rate of class II glass ionomer restorations. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2006; 7(2):85:91.
Smales RJ. Effect of rubber dam isolation on restoration deterioration. Amer J Dent1992;5:277–279.
Sofar JA, Davis RD, Overton JD, Effect of saliva contamination on the bond of dentine resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Oper Dent 1999;24:351–57.
Taifour D, Frencken JE, Beiruti N, van’t Hof MA, Truin GJ. Effectiveness of glass ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years. Caries res 2002;36(6):437–44.
Tandon S. Textbook of Paedodontics. Paras Medical Publishers, India, 1st Ed 2001; pg 283–312.
van der Hoef N, van Amerongen WE. Influence of local anaesthetic on the quality of class II glass ionomer restorations. Inter J Paediatr Dent 2007;17(4):239–47.
van Gemert-Schriks MCM, van Amerongen WE, ten Cate JM, Aartman IHA. Three-year survival of single- and two-surface ART restorations in a high-caries child population. Clin Oral Invest 2007;11(4):37–43.
Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM, Yip HK, Smales RJ. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results. Int Dent J 2004;54(1):42–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kemoli, A.M., van Amerongen, W.E. & Opinya, G.N. Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 11, 136–139 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262729
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262729