Skip to main content
Log in

Allelic Deletion Fingerprinting of Urine Cell Sediments in Bladder Cancer

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Molecular Diagnosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Bladder cancer shows frequent nonrandom allelic deletion at various chromosomal regions. Genotypic detection methods could potentially identify patients at risk for recurrent progressive disease. In this study, we examined allelic deletion at specific chromosomal loci in tumor tissue and urine cell sediment samples using a microsatellite-based protocol. Although both allelic deletion and microsatellite instability have been reported in primary bladder cancer, microsatellite instability was not specifically examined in this study. We report a pilot study of 40 patients with bladder cancer in which allelic deletion in tumor tissue and urine cell sediment was compared with conventional urine cytology results.

Methods and Results: Forty tumors were analyzed using a set of microsatellite primers from chromosomes 3, 4, 8, 11, 14, and 17 to construct allelic deletion fingerprints. Cy5.5-labeled PCR products were analyzed using the OpenGene System and GeneObjects software. Eighty-eight percent of tumors showed allelic deletion. In urine cell sediments, the tumor detection rate was 80% compared with 50% for routine urine cytology. The allelic deletion fingerprinting (ADF) procedure identified 69% of incipient tumors, cases initially classified as normal by routine urine cytology.

Conclusion: ADF analysis provides a reliable noninvasive method for the detection and monitoring of recurrent cancer in urine cell sediment samples from patients with bladder cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nam RK, Redelmeier DA, Spiess PE, Sampson HA, Fradet Y, Jewett MA: Comparison of molecular and conventional strategies for followup of superficial bladder cancer using decision analysis. J Urol 2000; 163:752–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boring C, Squiers T, Tong T, Montgomery S: Cancer statistics. Cancer J Clin 1994;44:7–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mao L: Genetic alterations as clonal markers for bladder cancer detection in urine. J Cell Biochem 1996;25:191–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sidransky D, Von Eschenbach A, Tsai C, et al.: Identification of p53 gene mutations in bladder cancers and urine samples. Science 1991;252:706–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosin M, Cairns P, Epstein J, Schoenberg M, Sidransky D: Partial allelotype of carcinoma in situ of the human bladder. Cancer Res 1995;55:5213–5216

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Knowles M, Elder P, Williamson M, Cairns J, Shaw M, Law M: Allelotype of human bladder cancer. Cancer Res 1994;54:531–538

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Knowles M: Molecular genetics of bladder cancer. Br J Urol 1995;75:57–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kryger JV, Messing E: Bladder cancer screening. Semin Oncol 1996;23:585–597

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Loh CS, Spedding AV, Ashworth MT, Kenyon WE, Desmond AD: The value of exfoliative urine cytology in combination with flexible cystoscopy in the diagnosis of recurrent transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Br J Urol 1996;77:655–658

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mao L, Schoenberg MP, Scicchitano M, Erozan YS, Schwab D, Sidransky D: Molecular detection ofprimary bladder cancer by microsatellite analysis. Science 1996;271:659–662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization: Histological typing of urinary bladder tumours. In WHO: International classification of tumours, no. 10. WHO, Geneva, 1973

  12. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer: TNM Classification of malignant tumours, 3rd ed. UnionInternationale Contre le Cancer, Geneva, 1978, pp 113-117

  13. Spruck C, Ohneseit P, Gonzalez-Zulueta M, et al.: Two molecular pathways to transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Cancer Res 1994;54:784–788

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Steiner G, Schoenberg M, Linn J, Mao L, Sidransky D: Detection of bladder cancer by microsatellite analysis of urine. Nat Med 1997;3:621–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hahn S, Seymour A, Hoque A, et al.: Allelotype of pancreatic adenocarcinoma using xenograft enrichment. Cancer Res 1995;55:4670–4675

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mao L, Lee D, Tockman M, Erozan Y, Askin F, Sidransky D: Microsatellite alterations as clonal markers for the detection of human cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994;91:9871–9875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob Shipman PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larsson, P.C.M., Beheshti, B., Sampson, H.A. et al. Allelic Deletion Fingerprinting of Urine Cell Sediments in Bladder Cancer. Molecular Diagnosis 6, 181–188 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262051

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262051

Key words

Navigation