Skip to main content
Log in

Using Resources for Scientific-Driven Pharmacovigilance

From Many Product Safety Documents to One Product Safety Master File

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current regulations require a description of the overall safety profile or the specific risks of a drug in multiple documents such as the Periodic and Development Safety Update Reports, Risk Management Plans (RMPs) and Signal Detection Reports. In a resource-constrained world, the need for preparing multiple documents reporting the same information results in shifting the focus from a thorough scientific and medical evaluation of the available data to maintaining compliance with regulatory timelines. Since the aim of drug safety is to understand and characterize product issues to take adequate risk minimization measures rather than to comply with bureaucratic requirements, there is the need to avoid redundancy.

In order to identify core drug safety activities that need to be undertaken to protect patient safety and reduce the number of documents reporting the results of these activities, the author has reviewed the main topics included in the drug safety guidelines and templates.

The topics and sources that need to be taken into account in the main regulatory documents have been found to greatly overlap and, in the future, as a result of the new Periodic Safety Update Report structure and require-ments, in the author’s opinion this overlap is likely to further increase. Many of the identified inter-document differences seemed to be substantially formal. The Development Safety Update Report, for example, requires separate presentation of the safety issues emerging from different sources followed by an overall evaluation of each safety issue. The RMP, instead, requires a detailed description of the safety issues without separate presentation of the evidence derived from each source. To some extent, however, the individual documents require an in-depth analysis of different aspects; the RMP, for example, requires an epidemiological description of the indication for which the drug is used and its risks. At the time of writing this article, this is not specifically required by other documents.

The author has identified signal detection (intended not only as adverse event disproportionate reporting, but including non-clinical, laboratory, clinical analysis data and literature screening) and characterization as the basis for the preparation of all drug safety documents, which can be viewed as different ways of presenting the results of this activity. Therefore, the author proposes to merge all the aggregate reports required by current regulations into a single document — the Drug Safety Master File. This report should contain all the available information, from any source, regarding the potential and identified risks of a drug. It should be a living document updated and submitted to regulatory authorities on an ongoing basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Regulation (EU) No 1235/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2010 amending, as regards pharmacovigilance of medicinal products for human use, Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorization and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency, and Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 on advanced therapy medicinal products [online]. Available from URL: http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-1/reg_2010_1235/reg_2010_1235_en.pdf [Accessed 2012 Jun 22]

  2. Directive 2010/84/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2010 amending, as regards phar-macovigilance, Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use [online]. Available from URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:348:0074:0099:EN:PDF [Accessed 2012 Jun 22]

  3. Furlan G, Douglas S. The Developmental Safety Update Report: the new way to drug safety or a born-again old report?. DIA Global Forum 2011 Aug; 3(4): 37–42

    Google Scholar 

  4. Urushihara H, Kawakami K. Developmental Safety Update Reports and proposals for effective and efficient risk communication. Drug Saf 2010; 33(5): 341–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. Final Business Plan. Periodic safety update reports for Marketed Drugs E2C (R2) and gap and potential improvement analysis of ICH E2C, E2E and E2F. 10 December 2010 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E2C/Concept_papers/E2C_R2_Final_Concept_Paper_December_2010.pdf [Accessed 2012 Jan 21]

  6. International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. Clinical safety data management: periodic safety update reports for marketed drug E2C (R1). 6 November 2006 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E2C/Step4/E2C_R1_Guideline.pdf [Accessed 2012 Jan 21]

  7. International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. Developmental safety update report E2F. Step 4 version 17 August 2010 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E2F/Step4/E2F_Step_4.pdf [Accessed 2012 Jan 21]

  8. European Medicines Agency. Annex C: template for EU risk management plan (EU-RMP). London, 27 September 2009. EMEA/192632/2006 [online]. Available from URL: http://eudravigilance.ema.europa.eu/human/docs/19263206en.pdf [Accessed 2012 Jan 2012]

  9. CIOMS Working Group VIII. Practical aspects of signal detection in pharmacovigilance. Geneva: CIOMS, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  10. European Commission, Health and Consumers Directorate-General. Implementing measures in order to harmonise the performance of the pharmacovigilance activities provided for in Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No. 726/2004. The concept paper submitted for public consultation [online]. Available from URL: http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/pharmacovigilance/2011-09_concept-paper.pdf [Accessed 2012 Jul 2]

  11. European Medicines Agency, Eudravigilance Expert Working Group (EV-EWG). Guideline on the use of statistical signal detection methods in the Eudravigilance data analysis system. London, 26 June 2008. Doc. ref. EMEA/106464/2006 rev 1 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Regulatory_and_procedural_guideline/2009/11/WC500011434.pdf [Accessed 2012 Jan 21]

  12. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Reflection paper on benefit-risk assessment methods in the context of the evaluation of marketing authorization applications of medicinal products for human use. London, 19 January 2007. Doc. ref. EMEA/CHMP/15404/2007 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Regulatory_and_procedural_guideline/2010/01/WC500069634.pdf [Accessed 2012 Jan 21]

  13. European Medicines Agency. Questions and answers on variations to an existing pharmacovigilance system as described in the DDPS. London 25 February 2011. EMA/802737/2010. [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Regulatory_and_procedural_guideline/2011/03/WC500102596.pdf [Accessed 2012 Jan 21]

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Natalie Smith (Director of Operations, PrimeVigilance) for reviewing the article.

No sources of funding were used to prepare this manuscript. At the time of writing this article, Dr Furlan was employed by PrimeVigilance, a pharmacovigilance service provider; however, since June 2012 he has been employed by Helsinn Birex Pharmaceuticals, a pharmaceutical company. Until July 2011 Dr Furlan held stocks in BB Biotech, a company investing in pharmaceutical companies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Furlan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Furlan, G. Using Resources for Scientific-Driven Pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 35, 615–622 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03261958

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03261958

Keywords

Navigation