Advertisement

Drug Investigation

, Volume 5, Supplement 1, pp 4–49 | Cite as

Pharmacology of Aniracetam

A Novel Pyrrolidinone Derivative with Cognition Enhancing Activity
  • J. R. Martin
  • W. E. Haefely
Article

Summary

A comprehensive review of the extensive preclinical pharmacological data available on the pyrrolidinone derivative aniracetam has provided convincing evidence of ameliorative effects on learning and memory. Such effects were most clearly observed in animals exhibiting impaired cognitive abilities. Aniracetam was consistently shown to be considerably more potent than the structurally similar, prototypic nootropic piracetam, which was often included in these experiments as a parallel, active control compound. The mechanism of action of the nootropics, including aniracetam, has remained elusive, although it has been speculated that indirect facilitation of cholinergic neurotransmission, especially under conditions of dysfunction, may contribute. Recent studies indicate that aniracetam acts at the AMPA subtype of glutamate receptors as a positive modulator. Metabolites of aniracetam have been found to exhibit positive effects on memory and probably contribute to the cognition enhancement observed after aniracetam treatment. Finally, aniracetam was shown to be well tolerated under the diverse test conditions and in the numerous species evaluated. Thus, the cognition enhancer aniracetam exhibits a pharmacological profile suggesting considerable potential therapeutic value in the treatment of dementias.

Keywords

Scopolamine Passive Avoidance Drug Invest Retention Test Piracetam 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberici GP, Steinfels GF. Comparative effects of putative cognitive enhancing compounds. Abstract. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 14: 249, 1988Google Scholar
  2. Bandle EF, Wendt G, Ranalder UB, Trautmann K-H. 2-Pyrrolidinone and succinimide endogenously present in several mammalian species. Life Sciences 35: 2205–2212, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartus RT, Dean RL, Beer B, Lippa AS. The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction. Science 217: 408–417, 1982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bassant MH, Jobert A, Dutar P, Lamour Y. Effect of psychotropic drugs on identified septohippocampal neurons. Neuroscience 27: 911–920, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bering B, Mueller WE. Interaction of piracetam with several neurotransmitter receptors in the central nervous system. Arzneimittel Forschung 35: 1350–1352, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowen DM, Francis PT. Neurochemistry, neuropharmacology and aetiological factors in Alzheimer’s disease. Seminars in Neuroscience 2: 101–108, 1990Google Scholar
  7. Brugger F, Evans RH, Wicki U, Olpe HR, Pozza MF. The modulation of the quisqualate receptor by the nootropic drug aniracetam in the hemisected rat spinal cord preparation. European Journal of Neuroscience (Suppl. 4): 122, 1991Google Scholar
  8. Cicardo VH, Carbone SE, Rondina DC, Mastronardi IO, Izquierdo JA. Effects of aniracetam on GABAergic-monoaminergic systems in rat brain and on motility: interactions with antagonists of dopamine receptors. International Research Communications System Medical Science 14: 1081–1082, 1986Google Scholar
  9. Copani A, Genazzani AA, Aleppo G, Casabona G, Canonica P, et al. Nootropic drugs positively modulate alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid-sensitive glutamate receptors in neuronal cultures. Journal of Neurochemistry 58: 1199–1204, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cumin R, Bandle EF, Gamzu E, Haefely WE. Effects of the novel compound aniracetam (Ro 13-5057) upon impaired learning and memory in rodents. Psychopharmacology 78: 104–111, 1982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. DeNoble VJ. Vinpocetine enhances retrieval of a step-through passive avoidance response in rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 26: 183–186, 1987Google Scholar
  12. DeNoble VJ, Repetti SJ, Gelpke LW, Wood LM, Keim KL. Vinpocetine: nootropic effects on scopolamine-induced and hypoxia-induced retrieval deficits of a step-through passive avoidance response in rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 24: 1123–1128, 1986Google Scholar
  13. Downs DA, Harrigan SE. Self-administration of Cl-844, hydergine and psychomotor stimulants by Rhesus monkeys. Abstract. International Journal of Neuroscience 32: 281, 1987Google Scholar
  14. Flood JF, Cherkin A. Scopolamine effects on memory retention in mice: a model of dementia? Behavioral and Neural Biology 45: 169–184, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Franceschi M, Alberoni M, Bressi S, Preda L, Cattaneo C, et al. Clinical models of phase I for the study of nootropic drugs. Pharmacological Research 22 (Suppl.): 214, 1990Google Scholar
  16. Frankin SR, Sethy VH, Tang AH. Amnesia produced by intra-cerebroventricular injections of hemicholinium-3 in mice was prevented by pretreatment with piracetam-like compounds. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 25: 925–927, 1986Google Scholar
  17. Funk KF, Schmidt J. Zur cholinergen Wirkung von Nootropika. Biomedica Biochimica Acta 47: 417–421, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Galliani G, Formento ML, Nencioni A, Barzaghi F. Animal models for screening nootropics. In Assandri A, Fumero S (Eds) Trends in drug development. Ivrea (Italy) Istituto di Ricierche Biomediche ‘A. Marxer’, pp. 43–74, 1989Google Scholar
  19. Gamzu E, Boff E, Zolcinski M, Vincent G, Verderese T. A rapidly acquired, appetitively motivated, serial spatial discrimination reversal in rats for evaluating manipulations of learning and memory. Abstract. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 9: 824, 1983Google Scholar
  20. Gamzu E, Vincent G, Verderese A, Boff E, Lee L, et al. Pharmacological protection against memory retrieval deficits as a method of discovering new therapeutic agents. In Fisher A et al. (Eds) Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease: strategies in research and development, pp. 375–391, Adv. Behav. Biol. Vol. 29, Plenum Press, New York, 1986Google Scholar
  21. Genazzani AA, Copani A, Aleppo G, Canonico PL, Nicoletti F. Nootropic drugs as positive modulators of AMPA receptors. Abstract. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 17: 796, 1991Google Scholar
  22. Genkova MG, Lazarova MB. Influence of nootropic drugs on the learning- and memory-impairing effect of diethyldithiocarbamate in albino rats. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology 10: 369–375, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Genkova-Papasova M, Lazarova-Bakurova M. Influence of nootropic drugs on memory-impairing effect of diethyldithiocarbamate and clonidine in ‘step down’ passive avoidance in albino rats. Acta Physiologica Pharmacologica Bulgarica 14: 36–42, 1988Google Scholar
  24. Giacobini E. Cholinergic receptors in human brain: effects of aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Neuroscience Research 27: 548–560, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibson GE, Peterson C. Pharmacologic models of age-related deficits. In Crook T et al. (Eds) Assessment of geriatric psychopharmacology, pp. 323–343, Mark Powley Associates, New Canaan, Connecticut, 1983Google Scholar
  26. Ginsberg MD, Busto R. Rodent models of cerebral ischemia. Stroke 20: 1627–1642, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Giurgea C. The predictive value of animal experimentation for clinical geropsychopharmacology. Gerontology 32 (Suppl. 1): 37–45, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Giurgea CE, Moyersoons FE. On the pharmacology of cortical evoked potentials. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Thérapie 199: 67–78, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gottfries CG. Pharmacological treatment strategies in dementia disorders. Pharmacopsychiatry 22: 129–134, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gottfries CG. Neurochemical aspects on aging and diseases with cognitive impairment. Journal of Neuroscience Research 27: 541–547, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Haegele KD, Schwartz JJ, Schoun J, Schmitt AH, Schechter PJ. 2-Pyrrolidinone in human cerebrospinal fluid: a major constituent of total gamma-aminobutyric acid. Journal of Neurochemistry 49: 1402–1406, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hall ED, Von Voigtlander PF. Facilitatory effects of piracetam on excitability of motor nerve terminals and neuromuscular transmission. Neuropharmacology 26: 1573–1579, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Himori N, Watanabe H, Matsuura A, Umeda Y, Kuwahara T, et al. General pharmacological properties of aniracetam, a cerebral insufficiency improver. Japanese Pharmacology and Therapeutics 14 (Suppl. 4): 93–128, 1986Google Scholar
  34. Ikeda Y, Tanabe S, Takatoh M. Effect of dibenzoxazepine analogue (BY-1949) on acquisition process of operant behaviour in aged rats. Abstract. Psychopharmacology 96 (Suppl.): 305, 1988Google Scholar
  35. Isaacson JS, Nicoll RA. Aniracetam reduces glutamate receptor desensitization and slows the decay of fast excitatory synaptic currents in the hippocampus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 88: 10936–10940, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ito I, Tanabe S, Kohda A, Sugiyama H. Allosteric potentiation of quisqualate receptors by a nootropic drug aniracetam. Journal of Physiology 424: 533–543, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Itoh J, Nabeshima T, Kameyama T. Utility of an elevated plusmaze for the evaluation of memory in mice: effects of nootropics, scopolamine and electroconvulsive shock. Psychopharmacology 101: 27–33, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Jaenicke B, Schulze G, Coper H. Motor performance achievements in rats of different ages. Experimental Gerontology 18: 393–407, 1983Google Scholar
  39. Jaenicke B, Wrobel D, Schulze G. The effects of various drugs on the motor performance capacity of old rats. Pharmacopsychiatry 18: 136–137, 1985Google Scholar
  40. Kaneko S, Sugimura M, Takahashi H, Inoue T, Satoh M. Selective inhibition of NMDA receptor function by nootropic drugs: elevation of the sites of action using mRNA-injected Xenopus oocyte responses and [3H]MK-801 binding assay. Abstract. Japanese Journal of Pharmacology 55 (Suppl.): 53P, 1991Google Scholar
  41. King GA. Protection against hypoxia-induced lethality in mice. A comparison of the effects of hypothermia and drugs. Archvies Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Thérapie 286: 282–298, 1987Google Scholar
  42. Kubota A, Furuya I, Kurasawa M. Pharmacological study of aniracetam II: choice reaction time-shortening action of aniracetam in aged rats; active metabolites, repeated treatment and sex difference. Japanese Pharmacology and Therapeutics 14 (Suppl. 4): 721–727, 1986aGoogle Scholar
  43. Kubota A, Furuya I, Kurasawa M. Pharmacological study of aniracetam III: choice reaction time-shortening action of aniracetam in rat post-cerebrovascular disease deficiency model (SHR-SP). Japanese Pharmacology and Therapeutics 14 (Suppl. 4): 729–732, 1986bGoogle Scholar
  44. Kubota A, Hayashi T, Sakagami T, Watanabe A, Nakamura K. Scopolamine model of retrograde amnesia: its prevention and relevant cerebral nuclei involved. In Saito S, Yanagita T (Eds) Learning and memory: drugs as reinforcers. pp. 96–118, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, 1982Google Scholar
  45. Kubota A, Kurasawa M, Furuya I. Pharmacological study of aniracetam I: Choice reaction time-shortening action of aniracetam in aged rats; effective doses and reference drugs. Japanese Pharmacology and Therapeutics 14 (Suppl. 4): 713–720, 1986cGoogle Scholar
  46. Kuwahara A, Kubota A, Hakkei M, Nakamura K. Drug dependence test on a cerebral insufficiency improver, aniracetam. Folia Pharmacologica Japonica 89: 33–46, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Laurent J-P, Humbel U. Aniracetam-induced enhancement of synaptic transmission in rat hippocampal slices: extracellular analysis. Abstract. Neuroscience 22 (Suppl.): S349, 1987Google Scholar
  48. Laurent J-P, Humbel U, Pozza M. Differential electrophysiological effects of aniracetam and piracetam in rat hippocampal slices. Presentation at IUPHAR 9th International Congress of Pharmacology, London, July 29–August 3, 1984Google Scholar
  49. Lazarova-Bakarova M, Genkova-Papasova M. Effects of nootropic drugs on diethyldithiocarbamate- or clonidine-impaired learning and memory in rats. Abstract. Psychopharmacology 96 (Suppl.): S35, 1988Google Scholar
  50. Lazarova-Bakarova MB, Genkova-Papasova MG. Influence of nootropic drugs on the memory-impairing effect of clonidine in albino rats. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology 11: 235–239, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Lorez H-P, Martin JR, Keller HH, Cumin R. Effect of aniracetam and the benzodiazepine receptor partial inverse agonist Ro 15-3505 on cerebral glucose utilization and cognitive function after lesioning of cholinergic forebrain nuclei in the rat. Drug Development Research 14: 359–362, 1988Google Scholar
  52. Lundholm B, Sparf B. The effect of atropine on the turnover of acetycholine in the mouse brain. European Journal of Pharmacology 32: 287–292, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Martin JR, Cumin R, Aschwanden W, Moreau J-L, Jenck F, et al. Aniracetam improves maze performance in rats. Neuro-Report 3: 81–83, 1992Google Scholar
  54. Matsuyama K, Miyazaki C, Masataka I. Development of a pyrrolidinone derivative (cyclic GABA) for modulating brain glutamate tranmission. Advances in Behavioral Biology 36: 185–196, 1989Google Scholar
  55. Miyazaki C, Matsuyama K, Ichikawa M, Goto S, Yamamoto J. Synthesis of valproyl-2-pyrrolidinone and its evaluation as a cognitive drug with the ability to modulate acidic amino acids in the brain. Journal of Pharmacobio-Dynamics 13: 70–75, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Mizuki Y, Yamada M, Katoh I, Takada Y, Tsujimaru S, et al. Effects of aniracetam, a nootropic drug, in senile dementia. Kurume Medical Journal 31: 135–143, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Mondadori C, Bhatnagar A, Borkowski J, Haeusler A. Involvement of a steroidal component in the mechanism of action of piracetam-like nootropics. Brain Research 506: 101–108, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Mondadori C, Ducret T, Borkowski J. The memory enhancing effects of the piracetam-like nootropics are dependent on experimental parameters. Behavioural Brain Research 33: 79–82, 1989aPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Mondadori C, Ducret T, Borkowski J. How long does ‘memory consolidation’ take? New compounds can improve retention performance, even if administered up to 24 hours after the learning experience. Brain Research 555: 107–111, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Mondadori C, Ducret T, Petschke F. Blockade of the nootropic action of piracetam-like nootropics by adrenalectomy: an effect of dosage? Behavioural Brain Research 34: 155–158, 1989bPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Mondadori C, Petschke F. Do piracetam-like compounds act centrally via peripheral mechanism? Brain Research 435: 310–314, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Moreau J-L, Jenck F, Bonetti EP, Martin JR, Haefely WE. Novel long-acting benzodiazepine receptor ligands Ro 41-7812 and Ro 42-8773: neurological and behavioral profile. Drug Development Research 22: 375–383, 1991Google Scholar
  63. Nabeshima T, Noda Y, Tohyama K, Itoh J, Kameyama T. Effects of DM-9384 in a model of amnesia based on animals with GABAergic neuronal dysfunctions. European Journal of Pharmacology 178: 143–149, 1990aPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Nabeshima T, Ogawa S, Kameyama T, Shiotani T, Takasu Y, et al. Effects of DM-9384 and aniracetam on learning in normal and basal forebrain-lesioned rats. Research Communications in Psychology, Psychiatry and Behavior 16: 1–14, 1991aGoogle Scholar
  65. Nabeshima T, Tohyama K, Kameyama T. Effects DM-9384, a pyrrolidinone derivative, on alcohol- and chloridiazepoxide-induced amnesia in mice. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 36: 233–236, 1990bGoogle Scholar
  66. Nabeshima T, Tohyama K, Murase K, Ishihara S, Kameyama T, et al. Effects of DM-9384, a cyclic derivative of GABA, on amnesia and decreases in GABAa and muscarinic receptors induced by cycloheximide. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 257: 271–275, 1991bPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Nakajima T, Kubota A, Nakamura K. Anti-amnestic agent and post-proline cleaving enzyme inhibition. Abstract. Folia Phar-macologica Japonica 82: 154P–155P, 1983Google Scholar
  68. Nakajima T, Takahashi M, Okada T. Pharmacological study of aniracetam VI: effects of aniracetam on muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the rat hippocampus. Japanese Pharmacology and Therapeutics 14 (Suppl. 4): 751–757, 1986Google Scholar
  69. Nakayama S, Ichihara S, Ichihara Y, Sakata H, Tomisawa H, et al. Pharmacokinetic study on aniracetam in rats I: Blood level profile, tissue distribution, and excretion after a single oral administration. Japanese Pharmacology and Therapeutics 14 (Suppl. 4): 129–145, 1986Google Scholar
  70. Ohno M, Yamamoto T, Kitajima I, Ueki S. WEB 1881 FU ameliorates impairment of working memory induced by scopolamine and cerebral ischemia in the 3-panel runway task. Abstract. Japanese Journal of Pharmacology 49 (Suppl.): 267P, 1989Google Scholar
  71. Okada T, Satoh T, Yajima T. Pharmacological study of aniracetam IV: a protective effect of aniracetam on decrease in deoxyglucose uptake in the rat brain under anemic hypoxia. Japanese Pharmacology and Therapeutics 14 (Suppl. 4): 733–740, 1986Google Scholar
  72. Okuyama S, Aihara H. Action of nootropic drugs on transcallosal responses in rats. Neuropharmacology 27: 67–72, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Ozawa S, Lino M, Abe M. Excitatory synapse in the rat hippocampus in tissue culture and effects of aniracetam. Neuroscience Research 12: 72–82, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Parnetti L, Bartorelli L, Bonaiuto S, Cucinotta D, Cuzzupoli M, et al. Aniracetam (Ro 13-5057) for the treatment of senile dementia of Alzheimer type: results of a multicentre clinical study. Dementia 2: 262–267, 1991Google Scholar
  75. Pepeu G, Marconcini Pepeu I, Casamenti F. The validity of animal models in the search of drugs for the aging brain. Drug Design and Delivery 7: 1–10, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Perio A, Terranova JP, Worms P, Bluthe RM, Dantzer R, et al. Specific modulation of social memory in rats by cholinomimetic and nootropic drugs, by benzodiazepine inverse agonists, but not by psychostimulants. Psychopharmacology 97: 262–268, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Petkov VD, Getova D, Mosharrof AH. A study of nootropic drugs for anti-anxiety action. Acta Physiologica et Pharmacologica Bulgaria 13: 25–30, 1987Google Scholar
  78. Petkov VD, Grahovska T, Petkov VV, Konstantinova E, Stancheva S. Changes in the brain biogenic monoamines of rats induced by piracetam and aniracetam. Acta Physiologica et Pharmacologica Bulgarica 10: 6–14, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Petkov VD, Kehayov R. Individually-determined differences in the effects of psychotropic drugs on memory (experiments on rats). Acta Physiologica et Pharmacologica Bulgarica 13: 30–36, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Petkov VD, Mosharrof AH, Milenkov B, Enev V. Learning and memory effects of four newly-synthesized aniracetam analogues. Acta Physiologica et Pharmacologica Bulgarica 15: 18–26, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Petkov VD, Mosharrof AH, Petkov VV, Kehayov RA. Age-related differences in memory and in the memory effects of nootropic drugs. Acta Physiologica et Pharmacologica Bulgarica 16: 28–36, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Pieri L, Schaffner R, Scherschlicht R, Polc P, Sepinwall J, et al. Pharmacology of midazolam. Arzneimittel-Forschung 31: 2180–2201, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Pietrusiak N, Vincent GP, Harney R, Sepinwall J. Use of proximal vs. distal cues in a water maze task is strain dependent: Aniracetam (Ro 13-5057) reverses distal cue deficits. Abstract. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 12: 705, 1986Google Scholar
  84. Pizzi M, Fallacara C, Memo M, Spano PF. Aniracetam prevents glutamate-induced neurotoxicity. Abstract. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 17: 792, 1991Google Scholar
  85. Pontecorvo MJ, Evans HL. Effects of aniracetam on delayed matching-to-sample performance on monkeys and pigeons. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 22: 745–752, 1985Google Scholar
  86. Poschel BPH, Ho PM, Ninteman FW, Callahan MJ. Pharmacologic therapeutic window of pramiracetam demonstrated in behavior, EEG, and single neuron firing rates. Experientia 41: 1153–1156, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Poschel BPH, Marriott JG, Gluckman MI. Pharmacology of the cognition activator pramiracetam (CI-879). Drugs Under Experimental and Clinical Research 9: 853–871, 1983Google Scholar
  88. Pozzi O, Allievi E, Biagetti R, Banfi S, Dorigotti L. Behavioural screening for potential nootropic drugs. Abstract. Pharmacological Research Communications 20 (Suppl. 2): 315, 1988Google Scholar
  89. Rigter H, Martinez JL, Crabbe JC. Forgetting and other behavioral manifestations of aging. In Stein DG (Ed.) The psychobiology of aging, pp. 161–175, Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam, 1980Google Scholar
  90. Roca J, Balasch J. Effect of nicardipine on vertebral blood flow in dogs. Drugs Under Experimental and Clinical Research 10: 399–403, 1984Google Scholar
  91. Rousseva S, Petkov VV, Petkov VD, Voronina TA, Nerobkova LN, et al. Memory effects of the combination of medazepam with nootropic agents. Acta Physiologica et Pharmacologica Bulgarica 14: 27–35, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Rumennik L, Vincent GP, Schwam E, Sepinwall J. A comparison of drug-induced effects on acquisition and retention in the squirrel monkey. Abstract. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 14: 60, 1988Google Scholar
  93. Sakurai T, Hatanaka S, Tanaka S, Yamasaki T, Kojima H, et al. Protective effect of DM-9384, a novel pyrrolidinone derivative, against experimental cerebral anoxia. Japanese Journal of Pharmacology 54: 33–43, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Sakurai T, Ojima H, Yamasaki T, Kojima H, Akashi A. Effects of N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-2-(2-oxo-1-pyrrolidinyl) acetamide (DM-9384) on learning and memory in rats. Japanese Journal of Pharmacology 50: 47–53, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Saletu B, Gruenberger J. The hypoxia model in human psychopharmacology: neurophysiological and psychometric studies with aniracetam i.v. Human Neurobiology 3: 171–181, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Saletu B, Gruenberger J, Linzmayer L. Quantitative EEG and psychometric analyses in assessing CNS-activity of Ro 13-5057 — a cerebral insufficiency improver. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology 2: 269–285, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Santucci V, Fournier M, Worms P, Keane P, Bizière K. Cerebralactivating (EEG) properties of two inverse agonists and of an antagonist at the benzodiazepine receptor in the rat. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology 340: 93–100, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Satoh M, Ishihara K, Iwama T, Takagi H. Aniracetam augments, and midazolam inhibits, the long-term potentiation in guineapig hippocampal slices. Neuroscience Letters 68: 216–220, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Satoh M, Ishihara K, Katsuki H. A pharmacological profile of LTP in CA3 region of guinea-pig hippocampus in vitro. Biomedical Research 10 (Suppl. 2): 125–129, 1989Google Scholar
  100. Schindler U, Rush DK, Fielding S. Nootropic drugs: animal models for studying effects on cognition. Drug Development Research 4: 567–576, 1984Google Scholar
  101. Schwam E, Keim K, Cumin R, Gamzu E, Sepinwall J. The effects of aniracetam on primate behavior and EEG. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 444: 482–484, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Senin U, Abate G, Fieschi C, Gori G, Guala A, et al. Aniracetam (Ro 13-5057) in the treatment of senile dementia of Alzheimer type (SDAT): results of a placebo controlled multicentre clinical study. European Neuropsychopharmacology 1: 511–517, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Sethy VH. Effect of piracetam on high affinity choline uptake. Abstract. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 9: 429, 1983Google Scholar
  104. Shih YH, Pugsley TA. The effects of various cognition-enhancing drugs on in vitro rat hippocampal synaptosomal sodium dependent high affinity choline uptake. Life Sciences 36: 2145–2152, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Smith G. Animal models of Alzheimer’s disease: experimental cholinergic denervation. Brain Research Reviews 13: 103–118, 1988Google Scholar
  106. Spignoli G, Pepeu G. Interactions between oxiracetam, aniracetam and scopolamine on behavior and brain acetylcholine. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 27: 491–495, 1987Google Scholar
  107. Spirt NM, Mangano RM. Modulation of ligand binding to muscarinic cholinergic receptors. Abstract. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 12: 993, 1986Google Scholar
  108. Stancheva SL, Alova LG. Effects of centrophenoxine, piracetam and aniracetam on monoamine oxidase activity in different rat brain structures. (Russian with English abstract). Famakologiia i Toksikologiia 51: 16–18, 1988Google Scholar
  109. Staubli U, Kessler M, Lynch G. Aniracetam has proportionately smaller effects on synapses expressing long-term potentiation: Evidence that receptor changes subserve LTP. Psychobiology 18: 377–381, 1990Google Scholar
  110. Tang C-M, Shi Q-Y, Katchman A, Lynch G. Modulation of the time course of fast EPSCs and glutamate channel kinetics by aniracetam. Science 254: 288–290, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Tobe A, Yamaguchi T, Nagai R, Egawa M. Effects of bifemelane hydrochloride (MCI-2016) on experimental amnesia (passive avoidance failure) in rodents. Japanese Journal of Pharmacology 39: 153–161, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Todorov S, Zamfirova R, Petkov VD. Study of the effects of nootropic agents on the adrenergic neurotransmission in smooth muscles of young and old animals. Acta Physiologica Pharmacologica Bulgarica 16: 38–45, 1990Google Scholar
  113. Tohyama K, Nabeshima T, Kameyama T. Effect of DM-9384, a pyrrolidinone derivative, on benzodiazepine-induced amnesia. Abstract. Psychopharmacology 96 (Suppl.): 305, 1988Google Scholar
  114. Toide K. Effects of aniracetam on one-trial passive avoidance tests and cholinergic neurons in discrete brain regions of rats. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Thérapie 298: 25–37, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Tsuzuki K, Takeuchi T, Ozawa S. Agonist- and subunit-dependent potentiation of glutamate receptors by a nootropic drug aniracetam. Molecular Brain Research 16: 105–110, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Verderese A, Vincent GP, Fernia P, Sepinwall J. The effects of aniracetam (Ro 13-5057) on memory consolidation and reversal of retrieval deficits in C57BL/6 and C57BL/10 mice. Abstract. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 12: 705, 1986Google Scholar
  117. Vincent G, Verderese A, Gamzu E. The effects of aniracetam (Ro 13-5057) and piracetam on the enhancement of memory in mice. Abstract. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 10: 258, 1984Google Scholar
  118. Vincent G, Verderese A, Gamzu E. The effects of aniracetam (Ro 13-5057) on the enhancement and protection of memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 444: 489–491, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Vincent GP, Sepinwall J. The memory enhancing effects of aniracetam (Ro 13-5057) on spatial memory are strain dependent. Abstract: Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 12: 704, 1986Google Scholar
  120. Vyklicky L, Patneau DK, Mayer ML. Modulation of excitatory synaptic transmission by drugs that reduce desensitization at AMPA/kainate receptors. Neuron 7: 971–984, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Watabe S, Yamaguchi H, Ashida S. effects of DM-9384, a new cognition-enhancing agent, on cholinergic system in rat cortex. Abstract. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 16: 137, 1990Google Scholar
  122. Watabe S, Yoshii M, Yamaguchi H, Ashida S. DM-9384, a new cognition-enhancing agent, is a potent facilitator of neuronal Ca channel activity as compared with other pyrrolidone derivatives. Abstract. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 17: 63, 1991Google Scholar
  123. Wesnes K, Anand R, Simpson P, Christmas L. The use of a scopolamine model to study the potential nootropic effects of aniracetam and piracetam in healthy volunteers. Journal of Psychopharmacology 4: 219–232, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Whitehouse P, Price D, Struble R, Clark A, Coyle J, et al. Alzheimer’s disease and senile dementia: loss of neurons in basal forebrain. Science 215: 1237–1239, 1983Google Scholar
  125. Worms P, Bizière K. Antagonism by cholinomimetic drugs of the turning induced by intrastriatal pirenzepine in mice. Psychopharmacology 93: 489–493, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Worms P, Kan J-P, Steinberg R, Terranova J-P, Perio A, et al. Cholinomimetic activities of minaprine. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology 340: 411–418, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Xiao P, Staubli U, Kessler M, Lynch G. Selective effects of aniracetam across receptor types and forms of synaptic facilitation in hippocampus. Hippocampus 1: 373–380, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Yamada K, Inoue T, Tanaka M, Furukawa T. Prolongation of latencies for passive avoidance responses in rats treated with aniracetam or piracetam. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 22: 645–648, 1985Google Scholar
  129. Yamamoto J, Toide K, Kasahara N, Matsuura N, Matsushita Y. Effects of various cerebroactive drugs on EEG activity in rabbits and anoxia in mice. Abstract. Japanese Journal of Pharmacology 46 (Suppl.): 167P, 1988Google Scholar
  130. Yoshimoto T, Kado K, Matsubara F, Koriyama N, Kaneto H, Tsuru D. Specific inhibitors for prolyl endopeptidase and their anti-amnesic effect. Journal of Pharmacobio-Dynamics 10: 730–735, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Yoshizaki H, Okada T. Pharmacological study of aniracetam V: inhibitory effect of aniracetam on scopolamine induced increase of sodium dependent high affinity choline uptake into rat hippocampus. Japanese Pharmacology and Therapeutics 14 (Suppl. 4): 741–750, 1986Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. Martin
    • 1
  • W. E. Haefely
    • 1
  1. 1.Pharma Division, Preclinical ResearchF. Hoffmann-La Roche LtdBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations