Skip to main content

The nature of the quaternion

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 December 2008

I regard it as an inelegance, or imperfection, in quaternions, or rather in the state to which it has been hitherto unfolded, whenever it becomes or seems to become necessary to have recourse to x, y, z, etc.” William Rowan Hamilton (quoted in a letter from Tait to Cayley)

Quaternions came from Hamilton after his really good work had been done; and, though beautifully ingenious, have been an unmixed evil to those who have touched them in any way, including Clerk Maxwell.” William Thomson, first baron Kelvin, 1892

…quaternions appear to exude an air of nineteenth century decay, as a rather unsuccessful species in the struggle-for-life of mathematical ideas. Mathematicians, admittedly, still keep a warm place in their hearts for the remarkable algebraic properties of quaternions but, alas, such enthusiasm means little to the harder-headed physical scientist.” Simon L. Altmann, 1986 [1]

Abstract

Some of the confusions concerning quaternions as they are employed in spacecraft attitude work are discussed. The order of quaternion multiplication is discussed in terms of its historical development and its consequences for the quaternion imaginaries. The different formulations for the quaternions are also contrasted. It is shown that the three Hamilton imaginaries cannot be interpreted as the basis of the vector space of physical vectors but only as constant numerical column vectors, the autorepresentation of a physical basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. [1]

    ALTMANN, S. L. Rotations, Quaternions, and Double Groups, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    SHUSTER, M. D. “A Survey of Attitude Representations,” The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 4, October–December 1993, pp. 439–517.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. [3]

    KUIPERS, J. B. Quaternions and Rotation Sequences, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    EULER, L. “Problema Algebraicum ob Affectiones Prorsus Singulares Memorabile,” Novi Commentari Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, Vol. 15, 1770, pp. 75–106.

    Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    EULER, L. “Nova Methodus Motum Corporum Rigidorum Determinandi,” Novi Commentari Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, Vol. 20, 1775, pp. 208–238, also Leonhardi Euleri Opera Omnia, Series Secunda, Opera Mechanica Et Astronomica, Basel, 1968, Vol. 9, pp. 99-125.

    Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    RODRIGUES, O. “Des lois géométriques qui régissent les déplacements d’un système solide dans l’espace, et de la variation des coordonnées provenant de ses déplacements consideéerés indépendamment des causes qui peuvent les produire,” Journal des Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, Vol. 5, 1840, pp. 380–440.

    Google Scholar 

  7. [7]

    GIBBS, J.W. Vector Analysis, E. B. Wilson, ed., New York, Scribners, 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    HAMILTON, W. R. “On Quaternions; or a New System of Imaginaries in Algebra,” Philosophical Magazine, Vol. 25, 1844, pp. 489–495.

    Google Scholar 

  9. [9]

    SHUSTER, M. D. “Attitude Analysis in Flatland: the Plane Truth,” The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 52, Nos. 1 and 2, January–June 2004, pp. 195–209.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. [10]

    CAYLEY, A. “On the Motion of Rotation of a Solid Body,” Cambridge Mathematics Journal, Vol. 3, 1843, pp. 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  11. [11]

    CAYLEY, A. “Recherches sur les Matrices dont les termes sont des fonctions linéaires d’une seule Indeterminée,” Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, Berlin, Crelle, 1855, pp. 313–317.

    Google Scholar 

  12. [12]

    CAYLEY, A. “Memoire on the Theory of Matrices,” Philosophical Transactions 1, Vol. CXLVIII, 1858, pp. 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. [13]

    CAYLEY, A. “On Certain Results Relating to Quaternions,” Philosophical Magazine, Vol. 26, 1845, pp. 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  14. [14]

    HAMILTON, W. R. Elements of Quaternions, London, Longmans, Green & Co., 1866.

    Google Scholar 

  15. [15]

    GIBBS, J.W. Scientific Papers, Vol. II, New York, Dover, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  16. [16]

    HEAVISIDE, O. Electromagnetic Theory, London, 1893 (Vol. 1), 1899 (Vol. 2), 1912 (Vol. 3).

    Google Scholar 

  17. [17]

    CROWE, M. J. A History of Vector Analysis, New York, Dover, 1967.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. [18]

    VAN DER WAERDEN, B. L. A History of Algebra, New York and Berlin, Springer Scientific + Business Media, 1985.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. [19]

    WERTZ, J. R. (ed.) Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control, New York and Berlin, Springer Science + Business Media, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  20. [20]

    SHUSTER, M. D. “The Youngest Quadrant,” in “In My Estimation,” The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 54, Nos. 3–4, July–December 2006, pp. 273–297.

    Google Scholar 

  21. [21]

    FALLON, L. S. III “Quaternions,” Appendix D in J. R. Wertz (ed.), op. cit., pp. 758–59.

    Google Scholar 

  22. [22]

    MARKLEY, F. L. “Parameterization of the Attitude,” Section 12.1 in J. R. Wertz (ed), op. cit., pp. 410–420.

    Google Scholar 

  23. [23]

    WIE, B. Space Vehicle Dynamics and Control, Reston, Virginia, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  24. [24]

    SCHAUB, H. and JUNKINS, J. L. Analytical Mechanics of Space Systems, Reston, Virginia, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  25. [25]

    CRASSIDIS, J. L. and JUNKINS, J. L. Optimal Estimation of Dynamic Systems, Boca Raton, Florida, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2004.

    MATH  Book  Google Scholar 

  26. [26]

    SHUSTER, M. D. and DELLINGER, W. Chapter 5, “Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control,” in PISCANE, V. L. (ed.), Fundamentals of Space Systems, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 236–325.

    Google Scholar 

  27. [27]

    HUGHES, P. C. Spacecraft Attitude Dynamics, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1986; reprint: Mineola, New York, Dover Publications, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  28. [28]

    HAMILTON, W. R. Lectures on Quaternions, Dublin, Hodges & Smith, 1853.

    Google Scholar 

  29. [29]

    CAYLEY, A. “Coordinates versus Quaternions,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 20, 1893–1894 session (published 1895), pp. 271–275.

    Google Scholar 

  30. [30]

    TAIT, P. G. “On the Intrinsic Nature of the Quaternion,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 20, 1893–1894 session (published 1895), pp. 276–284.

    Google Scholar 

  31. [31]

    HESTENES, D. New Foundations for Classical Mechanics, second edition, New York and Berlin, Springer Scientific + Business Media, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malcolm D. Shuster.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03256568.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shuster, M.D. The nature of the quaternion. J of Astronaut Sci 56, 359–373 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256558

Download citation

Keywords

  • Geometric Algebra
  • Spacecraft Attitude
  • Quaternion Multiplication
  • Attitude Matrix
  • Quaternion Space