Skip to main content
Log in

Analytic Solutions for Equal Mass Four-Craft Static Coulomb Formation

  • Published:
The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analytic constant charge solutions are investigated for square planar and 3-D tetrahedron four-craft static Coulomb formations. The solutions are formulated in terms of the formation geometry and attitude. In contrast to the two- and three-spacecraft Coulomb formations, a four-spacecraft formation has new equality and multiple inequality constraints that need to be satisfied for the individual spacecraft charges to be both unique and real. Unique charge relative equilibriums are important to reduce the overall power requirement of the spacecraft charge emision. A spacecraft must not only satisfy three inequality three-craft constraints to yield a real charge solution, but it must also satisfy two additional equality constraints to ensure that the spacecraft charges are unique. Further, a method is presented to reduce the number of equality constraints arising due to the dynamics of a four-spacecraft formation. The unique and real spacecraft charges are determined as a function of the orientation of the square formation in a given principal orbit plane. For the 3-D tetrahedron formation scenario there is only a unique set of charged products. The implementability constraints are numerically evaluated to show that only trivial equal-mass tetrahedron formations are possible where one craft is on the along-track axis with zero charge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BRISTOW, J., FOLTA, D., and HARTMAN, K. “A Formation Flying Technology Vision,” presented as paper AIAA 2000-5194 at the AIAA 2000 Space Conference and Exposition, Long Beach, CA, September 19–21, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. XIN, M., BALAKRISHNAN, S., and PERNICKA, H. “Position and Attitude Control of Deep-Space Spacecraft Formation Flying via Virtual Structure and ¸ — D Technique,” presented as paper AIAA 2000-6090 at the AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, CA, August 15–18, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. GURFIL, P. and KASDIN, N. “Dynamics and Control of Spacecraft Formation Flying in Three Body Trajectories,” presented as paper AIAA 2001-4026 at the AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Montreal, Canada, August 6–9, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. LEITNER, J., BAUER, F., FOLTA, D., MOREAU, M., CAREPENTER, R., and HOW, J. “Formation Flight in Space: Distributed Spacecraft Systems Develop New GPS Capabilities,” GPS World, February 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. TORKAR, K. et. al. “Spacecraft Potential Control aboard Equator-S as a Test for Cluster-II,” Annales Geophysicae, Vol. 17, 1999, pp. 1582–1591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. SCHMIDT, R. et. al. “Results from Active Spacecraft Potential Control on the Geotail Spacecraft,” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 100, No. A9, 1995, pp. 253–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. NAKAGAWA, T., ISHII, T., TSURUDA, K., HAYAKAWA, H., and MUKAI, T. “Net Current Density of Photoelectrons Emitted from the Surface of the GEOTAIL Spacecraft,” Earth Space and Planets, Vol. 52, 2000, pp. 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ESCOUBET, C. P., FEHRINGER, M., and GOLDSTEIN, M. “The Cluster Mission,” Annales Geophysicae, Vol. 19, No. 10/12, 2001, pp. 1197–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. TORKAR, K., RIEDLER, W., ESCOUBET, C. P., et. al. “Active Spacecraft Potential Control for Cluster—Implementation and First Results,” Annales Geophysicae, Vol. 19, No. 10/12, 2001, pp. 1289–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. KING, L., PARKER, G., and DESHMUKH, S. “Spacecraft Formation Flying using Inter-Vehicle Coulomb Forces,” Technical Report, NASA/NIAC, January 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. KING, L., PARKER, G., and DESHMUKH, S. “Study of Interspacecraft Coulomb Forces and Implication for Formation Flying,” AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 19, No. 3, May–June 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. BERRYMAN, J. and SCHAUB, H. “Analytical Charge Analysis for 2- and 3-Craft Coulomb Formations,” presented as paper AAS 05-278 at the AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Lake Tahoe, CA, August 7–11, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  13. NATARAJAN, A., SCHAUB, H., and PARKER, G. G. “Reconfiguration of a 2-Craft Coulomb Tether,” presented as paper AAS 06-229 at the AAS Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Tampa, FL, January 22–26, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. SCHAUB, H., HALL, C., and BERRYMAN, J. “Necessary Conditions for Circularly-Restricted Static Coulomb Formations,” presented as paper AAS 05-472 at the AAS Malcolm D. Shuster Astronautics Symposium, Buffalo, NY, June 12–15, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. NATARAJAN, A. and SCHAUB, H. “Linear Dynamics and Stability Analysis of a Coulomb Tether Formation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 29, July–August 2006, pp. 831–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. NATARAJAN, A. and SCHAUB, H. “Hybrid Conrol of Orbit Normal and Along-Track 2-Craft Coulomb Tethers,” presented as paper AAS 07-193 at the AAS Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Sedona, AZ, January 28–February 1, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  17. SCHAUB, H. and KIM, M. “Orbit Element Difference Constraints for Coulomb Satellite Formations,” presented as paper AIAA 04-5213 at the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Providence, Rhode Island, August 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. WANG, S. and SCHAUB, H. “Spacecraft Collision Avoidance Using Coulomb Forces With Separation Distance Feedback,” presented as paper AAS 07-112 at the AAS Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Sedona, AZ, January 28–February 1, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. PETTAZZI, L., IZZO, D., and THEIL, S. “Swarm Navigation and Reconfiguration using Electrostatic Forces,” Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Dynamics and Control of Systems and Structures in Space, Greenwich, London, England, July 19–20, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. IZZO, D. and PETTAZZI, L. “Self-assembly of Large Structures in Space using Inter-Satellite Coulomb Forces,” Proceedings of the 56th International Astronautical Congress, Fukuoka, Japan, October 17–21, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  21. NATARAJAN, A. and SCHAUB, H. “Orbit-Nadir Aligned Coulomb Tether Reconfiguration Analysis,” presented as paper AAS 08-149 at the AAS/AIAA Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting, Galveston, TX, January 27–31, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  22. HUSSEIN, I. I. and SCHAUB, H. “Stability and Control of Relative Equilibria for the Three-Spacecraft Coulomb Tether Problem,” presented as paper AAS 07-269 at the AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialists Conference, Mackinac Island, MI, August 19–23, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  23. MULLEN, E.G., GUSSENHOVEN, M. S., HARDY, D.A., AGGSON, T. A., and LEDLEY, B.G. “SCATHA Survey of High-Voltage Spacecraft Charging in Sunlight,” Journal of the Geophysical Sciences, Vol. 91, No. A2, 1986, pp. 1474–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. VASAVADA, H. Four-Craft Virtual Coulomb Structure Analysis for 1 to 3 Dimensional Geometries, Master’s thesis, Virginia Tech, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vasavada, H., Schaub, H. Analytic Solutions for Equal Mass Four-Craft Static Coulomb Formation. J of Astronaut Sci 56, 17–40 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256540

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256540

Keywords

Navigation