Reference
Bonanno L, Favaretto A, Rugge M, et al. Role of genotyping in non-small cell lung cancer treatment: current status. Drugs 2011; 71(17): 2231–46
Reference
Fosker C, Adlard JW, Shaaban A. Tailoring therapy for locally advanced breast cancer using molecular profiles: are we there yet? Drugs 2011; 71(15): 1947–55
Reference
Song S-H, Han S-W, Bang Y-J, et al. Epigenetic-based therapies in cancer: progress to date. Drugs 2011; 71(18): 2391–403
Reference
Williams VL, Torres-Cabala CA, Duvic M. Primary cutaneous small-to medium-sized CD4+ pleomorphic T-cell lymphoma: a retrospective case series and review of the provisional cutaneous lymphoma category. Am J Clin Dermatol 2011; 12(6): 389–401
Reference
Sung C, Lee PL, Tan LL, et al. Pharmacogenetic risk for adverse reactions to irinotecan in the major ethnic populations of Singapore: regulatory evaluation by the Health Sciences Authority. Drug Saf 2011; 34(12): 1167–75
Reference
vanKuilenburg ABP, Häusler P, Schalhorn A, et al. Evaluation of 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics in cancer patients with a c. 1905+1G>A mutation in DPYD by means of a Bayesian limited sampling strategy. Clin Pharmacokinet 2012; 51(3): 163–74
Reference
Kwok CS, Loke YK. Effects of proton pump inhibitors on platelet function in patients receiving clopidogrel: a systematic review. Drug Saf 2012; 35(2): 127–39
Reference
Verstuyft C, Delavenne X, Rousseau A, et al. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for predicting the impact of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 polymorphisms on fluindione and acenocoumarol during induction therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet 2012; 51(1): 41–53
Reference
Cai J, Huang Z, Yang G, et al. Comparing antihypertensive effect and plasma ciclosporin concentration between amlodipine and valsartan regimens in hypertensive renal transplant patients receiving ciclosporin therapy. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2011; 11(6): 401–9
Reference
Manzoli L, De Vito C, Marzuillo C, et al. Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Saf 2012; 35(3): 191–205
Reference
Panetta F, Nobili V, Sartorelli MR, et al. Celiac disease in pediatric patients with autoimmune hepatitis: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Paediatr Drugs 2012; 14(1): 35–41
Reference
Broughton T, Armon K. Defining juvenile idiopathic arthritis remission and optimum time for disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug withdrawal: why we need a consensus. Paediatr Drugs 2012; 14(1): 7–12
Reference
Fabre S, Apparailly F. Gene therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: current status and future prospects. Drugs 2011; 25(6): 381–91
Reference
de laMonte SM. Contributions of brain insulin resistance and deficiency in amyloid-related neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Drugs 2012; 72(1): 49–66
Reference
Roerig JL, Steffen KJ, Mitchell JE. Atypical antipsychotic-induced weight gain: insights into mechanisms of action. CNS Drugs 2011; 25(12): 1035–59
Reference
Li Q, Holland M, Huston A, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of BRCA1/2 genetic testing [abstract no. PD06-03]. Cancer Res 2011; 71 (24 Suppl.): 136s [online]. Available from URL: http://www.sabcs.org/UserPortal/Documents/Abstract_Book_SABCS_20111215.pdf [Accessed 2012 Mar 20]
Reference
Ingles J,McGaughran J, Scuffham PA, et al. A cost-effectiveness model of genetic testing for the evaluation of families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart. Epub 2011 Nov 29
References
Lala A, Sharma G, Hochman JS, et al. Genetic testing in patients with acute coronary syndromes to determine optimal anti-platelet strategy: a cost effective analysis [abstract no. 15474]. Circulation 2011; 124 (21 Suppl.): A15474 [online]. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/meeting_abstract/124/21_MeetingAbstracts/A15474?sid=a91cd2cb-6ada-48ca-8921-7f4235765cdd [Accessed 2012 Mar 20]
Hillegass WB, Zoghbi G, Brott BC, et al. Cost-effectiveness of new oral anti-platelet agents and testing strategies during early invasive management of acute coronary syndrome patients [abstract no. 18228]. Circulation 2011; 124 (21 Suppl.): A18228 [online]. Available from URL: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/meeting_abstract/124/21_MeetingAbstracts/A18228?sid=22f85df4-f3ec-4b49-a680-112eb0788156 [Accessed 2012 Mar 20]
References
Holt SDH, Bennett H, Bertelli G, et al. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of the Oncotype DX® breast cancer assay in clinical practice in the UK [abstract no. PD06-02]. Cancer Res 2011; 71(24 Suppl.): 136s [online]. Available from URL: http://www.sabcs.org/UserPortal/Documents/Abstract_Book_SABCS_20111215.pdf [Accessed 2012 Mar 20]
Lacey L, Chien R, Hornberger J. Cost-utility of the 21-gene breast cancer assay (Oncotype DX®) in the Irish healthcare setting [abstract no. P1-10-04]. Cancer Res 2011; 71(24 Suppl.): 213s [online]. Available from URL: http://www.sabcs.org/UserPortal/Documents/Abstract_Book_SABCS_20111215.pdf [Accessed 2012 Mar 20]
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Journal Watch. Mol Diagn Ther 16, 125–133 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256437
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256437