Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced Detection of Coxiella burnetii with a Complementary Locked Primer-Based Real-Time PCR Method

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objective: Coxiella burnetii is the bacterial causative agent of Q fever in humans. Because Q fever can establish itself with an initial inoculation of fewer than ten C. burnetii cells, a sensitive detection method for C. burnetii infection is needed for early detection. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a complementary locked primer (CLP)-based real-time PCR method for sensitive detection of C. burnetii infection.

Methods: To evaluate the ability of CLPs to enhance the efficiency of the real-time PCR assay for the C. burnetii IS1111 insertion sequence, the mean threshold cycle values from 20 real-time PCR replicates with either CLPs or conventional primers were determined using tenfold serial dilutions ( 102−108) of purified C. burnetii Nine Mile genomic DNA. In addition, the cross-reactivity between C. burnetii and 31 non-Coxiella species was examined.

Results: The CLP-based real-time PCR allowed specific and reliable detection of as few as 59 copies of the IS111 element present in the genome of C. burnetii, which represents approximately 2.96 genome equivalents or three cells of C. burnetii. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of CLP-based real-time PCR for sensitive detection of C. burnetii infection.

Conclusion: It can be concluded that the CLP-based real-time PCR assay is a more appropriate method for sensitive detection and quantification of C. burnetii than previously reported methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II

References

  1. Maurin M, Raoult D. Q fever. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999; 12: 518–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McQuiston JH, Childs JE. Q fever in humans and animals in the United States. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2002; 2: 179–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Komiya T, Sadamasu K, Toriniwa H, et al. Epidemiological survey on the route of Coxiella burnetii infection in an animal hospital. J Infect Chemother 2003; 9: 151–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kovácová E, Kazár J. Q fever: still a query and underestimated infectious disease. Acta Virol 2002; 46: 193–210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fournier PE, Raoult D. Comparison of PCR and serology assays for early diagnosis of acute Q fever. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 5094–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Welsh HH, Lennette EH, Abinanti FR, et al. Q fever studies: XXI. The recovery of Coxiella burnetii from the soil and surface water of premises harboring infected sheep. Am J Hyg 1959; 70: 14–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. DeLay PD, Lennette EH, Deome KB. Q fever in California: recovery of Coxiella burnetii from naturally-infected air-borne dust. J Immunol 1950; 65: 211–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Madariaga MG, Rezai K, Trenholme GM, et al. Q fever: a biological weapon in your backyard. Lancet Infect Dis 2003; 3: 709–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Turra M, Chang G, Whybrow D, et al. Diagnosis of acute Q fever by PCR on sera during a recent outbreak in rural south Australia. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006; 1078: 566–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stein A, Raoult D. Detection of Coxiella burnetti by DNA amplification using polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30: 2462–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kato K, Arashima Y, Asai S, et al. Detection of Coxiella burnetii specific DNA in blood samples from Japanese patients with chronic nonspecific symptoms by nested polymerase chain reaction. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1998; 21: 139–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang GQ, Hotta A, Mizutani M, et al. Direct identification of Coxiella burnetii plasmids in human sera by nested PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36: 2210–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boulos A, Rolain JM, Maurin M, et al. Measurement of the antibiotic susceptibility of Coxiella burnetii using real time PCR. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2004; 23: 169–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brennan RE, Samuel JE. Evaluation of Coxiella burnetii antibiotic susceptibilities by real-time PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 1869–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Klee SR, Tyczka J, Ellerbrok H, et al. Highly sensitive real-time PCR for specific detection and quantification of Coxiella burnetii. BMC Microbiol 2006; 6: 2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoover TA, Vodkin MH, Williams JC. A Coxiella burnetti repeated DNA element resembling a bacterial insertion sequence. J Bacteriol 1992; 174: 5540–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Seshadri R, Paulsen IT, Eisen JA, et al. Complete genome sequence of the Q-fever pathogen Coxiella burnetii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 5455–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Denison AM, Thompson HA, Massung RF. IS1111 insertion sequences of Coxiella burnetii: characterization and use for repetitive element PCR-based differentiation of Coxiella burnetii isolates. BMC Microbiol 2007; 7: 91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schneeberger PM, Hermans MH, van Hannen EJ, et al. Real-time PCR with serum samples is indispensable for early diagnosis of acute Q fever. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2010; 17: 286–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Raoult D, Marrie T, Mege J. Natural history and pathophysiology of Q fever. Lancet Infect Dis 2005; 5: 219–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Howe GB, Loveless BM, Norwood D, et al. Real-time PCR for the early detection and quantification of Coxiella burnetii as an alternative to the murine bioassay. Mol Cell Probes 2009; 23: 127–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rotz LD, Khan AS, Lillibridge SR, et al. Public health assessment of potential biological terrorism agents. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8: 225–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism. World at risk: the report of the Commission on the Prevention of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism. New York: Vintage Books, 2008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Eun-Ju Kim and Hong Yong Kang contributed equally to this work. The conduct of this study and the preparation of this manuscript were supported by an intramural grant from the National Institute of Health, Korea. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyuk Chu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, EJ., Kang, H.Y., Hwang, KJ. et al. Enhanced Detection of Coxiella burnetii with a Complementary Locked Primer-Based Real-Time PCR Method. Mol Diag Ther 15, 103–107 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256399

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256399

Keywords

Navigation