Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wissenschaftslandkarte Informationsmanagement

Mapping the intellectual structure of information management

  • WI - Aufsatz
  • Published:
Wirtschaftsinformatik

Abstract

In this paper, the main dimensions of information management are analysed by means of author cocitation. The article is structured as follows: After a short introduction, the method used in the study will be described. This will be followed by the structure of the study. According to the results of the analysis, a distinction can be made between technology-oriented and information-oriented information management approaches. Technology-oriented approaches deal primarily with the efficient and effective use of computer-based information systems. They are in the domains of Management Information Systems (MIS) and business informatics. Information-oriented approaches focus mainly on information, with special attention given to its transfer and use. The design of computer-based information systems is practically ignored by these approaches, which are in the field of information science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Bergeron, P.: Information Resources Management. In: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 31 (1996), S. 263–300.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Broadbent M., Koenig M. E. D.: Information and Information Technology Management. In: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 23 (1988), S. 237–270.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bayer, A. E.; Smart, J. C.; McLaughlin, G. W.: Mapping Intellectual Structure of a Scientific Subfield through Author Cocitations. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41 (1990) 6, S. 444–452.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cash, J. I.; Konsynski, B. R.: IS Redraws Competitive Boundaries. In: Harvard Business Review, 63 (1985) March/April, S. 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Culnan, M. J.; OReilly, Ch.; Chatman, J.: Intellectual Structure of Research in Organizational Behavior, 1972-1984: A Cocitation Analysis. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41 (1990) 6, S. 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: Elements of Information Management. Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, NJ 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cottrill, C. A.; Rogers, E. M.; Mills, T.: Co-Citation Analysis of the Scientific Literature of Innovation Research Traditions. In: Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 11 (1989), S. 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Culnan, M. J.: The Intellectual Development of Management Information Systems, 1972-1982: A Co-Citation Analysis. In: Management Science 32 (1986) 2, S. 156–172.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Culnan, M. J.: Mapping the Intellectual Structure of MIS, 1980-1985: A Co-Citation Analysis. In: MIS Quarterly, September 1987, S. 341–354.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, G. B.; Olson, M. H.: Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure, and Development. 2. Aufl., McGraw- Hill, New York 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davenport, Th.: Saving ITs Soul — Human-Centered Information Management. In: Harvard Business Review 72 (1994) 2, S. 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ding, Y.; Chowdhury, G.; Foo, S.: Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Information Retrieval Studies: An Author Co-Citation Analysis, 1987-1997. In: Journal of Information Science 25 (1999) 1, S. 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dickson, G. W.; Leitheiser, R. L.; Wetherbe, J. C.; Nechis, M.: Key Information Systems Issues for the 1980s. In: MIS Quarterly 8 (1984) 3, S. 135–159.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Earl, M. J.: Management Strategies for Information Technology. Prentice Hall, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Garfield, E.: The Impact Factor. In: Current Contents, 20. Juni 1994. http://www.isinet.com/isi/hot/essays/journalcitationreports/7.html Abruf am 2002-01-11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Horton, F. W.: Information Resources Management: Harnessing Information Assets for Productivity Gains in the Office, Factory and Laboratory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kä rki, R.: Searching for Bridges between Disciplines: An Author Co-Citation Analysis on the Research into Scholarly Communication. In: Journal of Information Science 22 (1996) 5, S. 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Korwitz, U.: Welchen „Rang” hat ein Wissenschaftler? In: Nachrichten für Dokumentation 46 (1995), S. 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lawani, S. M.: Bibliometrics: Its Theoretical Foundations, Methods and Applications. In: Libri 31 (1981) 4, S. 294–315.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis, B. R.; Snyder, C. A.; Rainer, R. K.: An Empirical Assessment of the Information Resource Management Construct. In: Journal of Management Information Systems 12 (1995) 1, S. 199–223.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lucas, H. C.: Managing Information Services. Macmillan, New York 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marchand, D. A.; Horton, F. W.: Infotrends: Profiting from your Information Resources. Wiley, New York 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Martin, J.; Leben, J.: Strategic Information Planning Methodologies. 2. Aufl., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Martin, J.: Information Engineering — A Trilogy. Bd. 1: Introduction, Bd. 2: Planning and Analysis, Bd. 3: Design and Construction. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1989 und 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McCain, K.: Mapping Authors in Intellectual Space: Population Genetics in the 1980s. In: Communication Research 16 (1989) 5, S. 667–681.

    Google Scholar 

  26. McCain, K.: Mapping Authors in Intellectual Space: A Technical Overview. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41 (1990) 6, S. 433–443.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McFarlan, F. W.: Information Technology Changes the Way You Compete. In: Harvard Business Review 62 (1984) 3, S. 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nolan, R. L.: Managing the Computer Resource: A Stage Hypothesis. In: Communication of the ACM 16 (1973) Juli, S. 339–405.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Paisley, W.: An Oasis Where Many Trails Cross: The Improbable Cocitation Networks of a Multidiscipline. In: Journal of the American Society of Information Science 41 (1990) 6, S. 459–468.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Roberts, N.; Wilson, T. D.: Information Resource Management: A Question of Attitudes. In: International Journal of Information Management 7 (1987) 2, S. 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rockart, J. F.: Chief Executives Define Their Own Data Needs. In: Harvard Business Review 57 (1979) March/April, S. 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schlögl, Ch.: Bestandsaufnahme Informationsmanagement: Eine szientometrische, qualitative und empirische Analyse. Gabler Edition Wissenschaft, Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Small, H.: Co-Citation in the Scientific Literature. A New Measure of the Relationship between Two Documents. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24 (1973) 5, S. 265–269.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sprague, R. H.; McNurlin, B. C.: Information Systems Management in Practice. 5. Aufl., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stock, W.: Die Bedeutung der Zitatenanalyse für die Wissenschaftsforschung. In: Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 16 (1985) 2, S. 304–314.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Synnott, W. R.: The Information Weapon. Winning Customers and Markets with Technology. Wiley, New York 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Taylor, R. S.: Value-Added Processes in Information Systems. Ablex, Norwood 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Trauth, E. M.: The Evolution of Information Resource Management. In: Information and Management 16 (1989) 5, S. 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Van Raan, A. F. J.: Scientometrics: Stateof- the-Art. In: Scientometrics 38 (1997) 1, S. 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vickers, P.: Information Management: A Practical View. In: ASLIB Proceedings 36 (1984) 6, S. 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  41. White, H. D.; Griffith, B. C.: Author Cocitation: A Literature Measure of Intellectual Structure. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 32 (1981) 5, S. 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  42. White, H. D.; McCain, K. W.: Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-Citation Analysis of Information Science, 1972-1995. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49 (1998) 4, S. 327–355.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wilson, T. D.: Tools for the Analysis of Business Information Needs. In: Aslib Proceedings 46 (1994) 1, S. 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wohlgenannt, R.: Was ist Wissenschaft. Vieweg, Braunschweig 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Winterhager, M.; Weingart, P.; Sehringer, R.: Die Cozitationsanalyse als bibliometrisches Verfahren zur Messung der nationalen und institutionellen Forschungsperformanz. In: Daniel, H.-D.; Fisch, R. (Hrsg.): Evaluation von Forschung: Methoden — Ergebnisse — Stellungnahmen. Universitätsverlag Konstanz, Konstanz 1988, S. 319–358.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Informationswissenschaft, Universität Graz, Universitätsstraße 15/F3, A-8010, Graz, Österreich

    Christian Schlögl

Authors
  1. Christian Schlögl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schlögl, C. Wissenschaftslandkarte Informationsmanagement. Wirtschaftsinf 45, 7–16 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03250879

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03250879

Keywords

Search

Navigation