Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On the politics of performance in South African education: Autonomy, accountability and assessment

  • School Autonomy And Evaluation
  • Published:
Prospects Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

The South African obsession with performance-based pedagogies, as I have shown, has negative implications for resolving equity problems in educational reforms; it threatens to negate a political debate about ‘goals’ in favour of a technician’s debate about ‘ends’; and it fragments knowledge into meaningless tasks that assign value to external behaviours rather than the multiplicity of ways in which learning and valuing can be experienced (if not always expressed). The real danger to building a strong democratic culture through education is that what should be vibrant debates about ‘what’s worth knowing’ could be effectively silenced in a performance assessment system that only values, through a complex assessment system, that which is worth doing. Such an understanding of education is, unfortunately, entrenched in a global network of economic and technological processes that make such pursuits appear both normal and inevitable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • African National Congress. 1994.A policy framework for education and training. Braamfontein, Johannesburg, Centre for Education Policy Development. (Discussion document.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, N., et al. 1998.Thinking again: education after postmodernism. Westport, CT, Bergin Garvey. (Also in ‘New directions in social science’, Lecture of the week, retrospecthttp://www.dur.ac.uk/~dedOrds/newdirectionslectwk.htm)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M. 2000. Globalization and higher education.Perspectives in education (Pretoria, South Africa), vol. 18, no. 3, p. 13–26. (Special issue on higher education, globalization and the Third World State.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R.; Nicoll, K.; Tait, A. 1999. Migrating metaphors: the globalization of flexibility in policy.Journal of education policy (London), vol. 14, no. 6, p. 619–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R.; Usher, R. 1997. Final frontiers? globalization, pedagogy and (dis)location.Curriculum studies (Wallingford, United Kingdom), vol. 5, no. 3, p. 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J.D. 1999.Setting the scene: historiographies of curriculum policy in South Africa. Changing curriculum: studies in outcomes based education in South Africa. Cape Town, Juta Academic Publishers, p. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 2000. The pedagogic expression and implications of globalization.Perspectives in education (Pretoria, South Africa), vol. 18, no. 3, p. 5–12. (Special issue on higher education, globalization and the Third World State.)

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 2001. Globalisation, markets and the Third World university: preliminary notes on the role of the state in South African higher education.In: Sayed, Y.; Jansen, J., eds.Implementing education policies: The South African experience. Cape Town, South Africa, University of Cape Town Press, p. 162–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J.D.; Christie, P. 1999.Changing curriculum: studies in outcomes based education in South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa, Juta Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.F. 1984.The post-modern condition: a report on knowledge. Manchester, United Kingdom, Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClaren, P. 1998. Revolutionary pedagogy in post-revolutionary times: rethinking the political economy of critical education.Educational theory (Champaign, IL), vol. 48, no. 4, p. 431–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, W. 2001.The experience of the standards generating body for educators for schooling. Paper presented to the Deans Seminar of the South African Vice-Chancellors Association, Pretoria.

  • Nxesi, T. 2001.Education transformation: from policy to practice—a decade of struggle for quality public education and job security. Opening address to the SADTU (South African Democratic Teachers Union) National Education Policy Conference, 17–21 April, Gallagher Estate, Midrand.

  • Pretorius, C. 1998.Getting to grips with the new game, http://www.suntimes.co.za/edu/high-ered/1998/highl.htm

  • South Africa. Department of Education. 2000. The national policy on whole school evaluation, 31 August 2000.Government gazette (Pretoria), 6 September, vol. 423, no. 21539.

  • --. --. 2001National plan on higher education. Pretoria.

  • Spady, W.G. 1998.Reform in search of a definition. Dillon, CO, Breakthrough Learning Systems. (Unpublished manuscript.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original language: English

His two most recent books areChanging curriculum: studies on outcomes based education in South Africa (with Pam Christie) andImplementing education policy: the South African experience (with Yusuf Sayed). Professor Jansen was a high-school science teacher, educational consultant, academic administrator and policy researcher with various institutions including the University of Durban Westville, Creative Associates International (Washington, DC) and the United Nations. He contributes to and serves in various editorship roles for theInternational journal of qualitative studies in education, theJournal of science, Perspectives in education, and theJournal of inservice education.

About this article

Cite this article

Jansen, J.D. On the politics of performance in South African education: Autonomy, accountability and assessment. Prospects 31, 553–564 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03220039

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03220039

Keywords

Navigation