References
Cremers-van Wees, L.M.C.M., et al. 1996a.Instrumenten voor zelfevaluatie: inventarisatie en beschrijving [Instruments for school self-evaluation: inventory and description]. Enschede, Netherlands, Universiteit Twente, OCTO.
——. 1996b.Instrumenten voor zelfevaluatie: beschrijving van 31 instrumenten [Instruments for school self-evaluation: description of 31 instruments]. Enschede, Netherlands, Universiteit Twente, OCTO.
Engelen, R., et al. 1997.Schoolzelfevaluatie in het basisonderwijs: interimrapportage van het gezamenlijke project van Cito, SLO en OCTO (periode maart 1995-december 1996) [School self-evaluation in primary education: interim report of the collaborative project of Cito, SLO and OCTO (period March 1995-December 1996)]. Enschede, Netherlands, Universiteit Twente, OCTO.
Fullan, M. 1991.The new meaning of educational change. London, Cassell Educational Limited.
Hendriks, M.A. 2000.Kwaliteitszorg voortgetzet onderwijs: instrumenten en organisaties. [Quality assurance in secondary education: instruments and organizations]. Utrecht, Netherlands, VVO.
Hendriks, M.A.; Doolaard, S.; Bosker, R.J. 2001. Using school effectiveness as a knowledge base for self-evaluation in Dutch schools.In: Coe, R.; Visscher, J., eds.School improvement through performance feedback. Lisse, Netherlands, Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
Ministry of Education, Culture & Sciences. 1995.De school als lerende organisatie: ktualiteitsbeleid op scholen voor primair en voortgezet onderwijs [The school as a learning orga-nization: quality policy in schools for primary and secondary education]. The Hague, SDU, DOP.
-- 1999.Diversity and a guarantee. Proposals for the development of the supervision of education. The Hague.
Moelands, H.A.; Ouborg, M.J. 1995. School self-evaluation in primary education in the Netherlands. (Paper for the conference for Senior European Community Officials in Brussels.)
Moelands, H.A., et al. 2000.Zelfevaluatie basisonderwijs (ZEBO): naar een geïntegreerd instrumentarium. Eindrapport van het gezamenlijke project van Cito, OCTO en SLO [Self-evaluation in primary education. Final report of the collaborative project of Cito, SLO and OCTO]. Enschede, Netherlands, Universiteit Twente, OCTO.
Scheerens, J. 1995.Towards an integrated instrumentation of school self-evaluation descrip-tion of the Cito, SLO, OCTO-joint project on school self evaluation in primary education. (Internal paper.)
Scheerens, J.; Bosker, R.J. 1997.The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford, Elsevier Science/Pergamon.
Solomon, J., ed. 1998. Trends in the evaluation of education systems school (self-) evaluation and decentralization. (European Workshop-Papers, Reports, Discussion Outcomes. Athens. Hellenic Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs, Pedagogical Institute Department of Evaluation and European Commission, D.G. XXII, Education, Training and Youth, Directorate A Unit 1.)
VVO. 1998a. Met gefaseerde aanpak. Invoering schoolplan is geen moordklus [Approach in phases. Implementating school plan no tough job].VVO-magazine (Utrecht, Netherlands), no. 3, p. 19–20.
--. 1998b. Planlast van scholen. Nieuwe regels fungeren als knellend confectiepak [Planning burden of schools: new rules act as tight ready-to-wear suit].VVO-magazine (Utrecht, Netherlands), no. 3, p. 21–22.
WVO. 1998.Wet op het voortgezet onderwijs. Tekst & toelichting [Law on secondary education. Text and explanation]. Elsevier bedrijfsinformatie bv. http://www.ebi.nl/uk/index.php3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Original language: English
Her main academic fields are school self-evaluation, quality evaluation and the development and measurement of educational indicators. Involved in several national and international quality evaluation projects. Since 1997 she has been involved in Network C of the OECD-INES project. This network focuses on the development and measurement of indicators on human resources in education and process indicators of school functioning.
Her main academic fields are school effectiveness and improvement, class size and quality care. Her thesis (Schools in change or schools in chains) explores the effects of changes in process indicators on changes in the achievement level of students. She also participated in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. She has been working at a school counselling service, where quality care and school self-evaluation was her main issue.
He has published on school effectiveness research—The foundations of educational effectiveness (Pergamon) co-authored with Jaap Scheerens—and onMulti-level statistical models—multilevel analysis, an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (Sage) co-authored with Tom Snijders. His current work involves issues of quality care in education, accountability and the publishing of school performance data, class size and student achievement, inequality of educational opportunities and the organization of schools.
About this article
Cite this article
Hendriks, M.A., Doolaard, S. & Bosker, R.J. School self-evaluation in the Netherlands: Development of the ZEBO-instrumentation. Prospects 31, 503–518 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03220036
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03220036