Abstract
Dextran as a candidate material for colon-specific drug delivery has been studied. Crosslinked dextran hydrogels were prepared by mixing dextran, MgCl2, glutaraldehyde (GA) and polyethyleneglycol (PEG 400)|in water. The dextran hydrogels were characterized by measuring equilibrium swelling ratios and mechanical strengths. Response surface methodology (Central Composite Design) was used to evaluate the swelling behaviors and mechanical strengths as functions of concentrations of MgCl2, GA, and PEG 400, which was found to be useful for the evaluation. It showed that the swelling behavior and mechanical strengths were influenced significantly by PEG 400 and MgCl2 concentrations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Chen, S. Jo, and K. Park,Carbohydrate Polymer,28, 69 (1995).
E. Hultin and L. Nordstom,Acta. Chem. Scand.,3, 1405 (1949).
B. Ingelman,Acta. Chem. Scand.,2, 803 (1948).
T. W. Sery and E. J. Hehre,J. Bacteriol.,71, 373 (1956).
R. W. Bailey and R. T. J. Clarke,Biochemistry,72, 49 (1959).
E. L. Rosenfeld and L. S. Lukomskaya,Clin. Chem. Acta.,2, 105 (1957).
A. Segal,The Clinical Use of Dextran Solution, Grune and Stratter, New York, 1964.
E. de Raucort, S. Mauray, F. Chaubet, O. Maiga-Revel, M. Jozefowicz, and A. M. Fischer,J. Biomed. Mater. Res.,41, 49 (1998).
E. J. Hehre and T. W. Sery,J. Bacteriol.,63, 424 (1952).
M. Dubois, K. A. Gilles, J. K. Hamilton, P. A. Rebers, and F. Smith,Anal. Chem.,28, 350 (1956).
A. D. McLeod, D. R. Friend, and T. N. Tozer,J. Pharm. Sci.,83, 1284 (1994a).
H. Brondsted, L. Hovgaard, and L. Simonsen,S.T.P. Pharm.,5, 60 (1995a).
H. Brondsted, L. Hovgaard, and L. Simonsen,S.T.P. Pharm.,5, 65 (1995b).
H. Brondsted, C. Andersen, and L. Hovgaard,J. Control. Release,53, 7 (1998).
Y. Ogata, M. Okano, and T. Ganke,J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,78, 2962 (1956).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, BH., Kim, D., Jung, YS. et al. Swelling behavior and mechanical strength of crosslinked dextran hydrogel. Macromol. Res. 11, 291–295 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03218366
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03218366