Skip to main content
Log in

Difference in structural change in the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves implanted in the mitral and tricuspid positions

  • Case Report
  • Published:
The Japanese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report a 29-year-old patient with prosthetic valve dysfunction with severe calcific stenosis in the mitral position but no structural change in the tricuspid position after mitral valve replacement and tricuspid valve supra-annular implantation with same bioprostheses at the seven years before. The difference in structural change between the mitral position and the tricuspid position might be due mainly to the effect of mechanical stress on the cusps, rather than to any difference in serum calcium levels. However, some hormonal effect other than that of the parathyroid hormone on the systemic and pulmonary circulation might be related to the early progression in cusp calcification in the systemic circulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frater RWM, Salmon NW, Rainer WG, Cosgrove DM, Wickham E. The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: intermediate results. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 53: 764–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pelletier LC, Carrier M, Leclerc Y, Dyrda I. The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: clinical experience with 600 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: S297–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marchand M, Aupart M, Norton R, Goldsmith IRA, Pelletier C, Pellerin M, et al. Twelve years’ experience with Carpentier-Edwards perimount pericardial valve in the mitral position: a multicenter study. J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7: 292–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Terada Y, Wanibuchi Y. Surgically-treated case of marfanoid hypermobility syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57: 1688

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schoen FJ, Fernandez J, Gonzalez-Lavin L, Cernaianu A. Causes of failure and pathological findings in surgically removed ionescu-shiley standard bovine pericardial heart valve bioprostheses: emphasis on progressive structural deterioration. Circulation 1987; 76: 618–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aupart MR, Neville PH, Hammami S, Sirinelli AL, Meurisse YA, Marchand MA. Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves in the mitral position: ten-year follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 113: 492–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakano K, Eishi K, Kosakai Y, Isobe F, Sasako Y, Nagata S, et al. Ten-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenograft in the tricuspid position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111: 605–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohata, T., Kigawa, I. & Wanibuchi, Y. Difference in structural change in the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves implanted in the mitral and tricuspid positions. Jpn J Thorac Caridovasc Surg 48, 242–244 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03218131

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03218131

Key words

Navigation