Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of storage temperature on cell viability in cryopreserved canine aortic, pulmonic, mitral, and tricuspid valve homografts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Japanese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We determined how long cryopreserved aortic, pulmonic, mitral, and tricuspid valve homografts could be stored in a deep freezer (−80°C) without compromising fibroblast viability. Valves harvested from 20 anesthetized mongrel dogs were grouped into nonfrozen control, frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen (−196°C), and frozen and stored in a deep freezer (−80°C). Frozen groups were divided into subgroups and stored for 2, 4, 8, or 12 weeks. A leaflet of each valve was divided into three fragments, and fibroblast viability was analyzed by flow cytometry. Cell viability was defined as staining by fluorescent diacetate but not by propidium iodide. The viability of untreated control valves from all four sites was about 70%, decreasing to about 50% when treated with low doses of antibiotics. The viability of frozen valves stored in liquid nitrogen was about 45% without a significant difference among storage periods. The viability of valves frozen and stored in a deep freezer was significantly lower than for the liquid nitrogen group at 2 weeks for the mitral valve and at 4 weeks for other valves. These results suggest that homografts can be stored in a deep freezer for up to 2 weeks without deterioration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barratt-Boyes BG, Roche AHG, Whitlock RML. Six-year review of the results of freehand aortic valve replacement using an antibiotic sterilized homograft valve. Circulation 1997; 55: 353–61.

    Google Scholar 

  2. O’Brien MF, McGiffin DC, Stafford EG, Gardner MAH, Pohlner PF, McLachlan GJ, et al. Allograft aortic valve replacement. long-term comparative clinical analysis of viable cryopreserved and antibiotic 4°C stored valves. J Card Surg 1991; 6 (Suppl 1): 534–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berghuis J, Van Vliet PD, Titus JL, Swan HJC, Ellis FH Jr. Homotransplantation of the Caine mitral valve. Circulation 1964; 29 (Suppl 1): 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Acar C, Farge A, Ramsheyi A, Chachques JC, Mihaileanu S, Gouezo R, et al. Mitral valve replacement using a cryopreserved mitral homograft. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57: 746–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Acar C, Tolan M, Berrebi A, Gaer J, Gouezo R, Marchix T, et al. Homograft replacement of the mitral valve — graft selection, technique of implantation, and results in forty-three patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111: 367–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brockbank KGB, Carpenter JF, Dawson PE. Effects of storage temperature on viable bioprosthetic heart valves. Cryobiology 1992; 29: 537–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Feng XJ, Van Hobe CEJ, Walter PJ, Herman AG. Effects of storage temperature and fetal calf serum on the endothelium of porcine aortic valves. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111: 218–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Endl E, Steinbach P, Schärfe J, Fickweiler S, Wörle K, Hofstädter F. Cell-type-specific response to shock waves of suspended or pelleted cells as analysed by flow cyctometry or electrical cell volume determination. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 1996; 22: 515–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones KH, Senft JA. An improved method to determine cell viability by simultaneous staining with flourescein diacetate-propiduim iodide. J Histochem and Cytochem 1985; 33: 77–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Niwaya K, Sakaguchi H, Kawachi K, Kitamura S. Effect of warm ischemia and cryopreservation on cell viability of human allograft valves. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: s114–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lockey E, Janabi NAI, Lavin LG, Ross DN. A method of sterilizing and preserving fresh allograft heart valves. Thorax 1972; 27: 398–400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lavin LG, Janabi NAI, Lockey E, Ross DN. Fibroblast viability in antibiotic-treated valves. NZ med J 1973; 77: 36–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Crescenzo DG, Hilbert SL, Barrick MK, Corcoran PC, St. Louis JD, Messier RH, et al. Donor heart valves: electron microscopic and morphometric assessment of cellular injury induced by warm ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 103: 253–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Karow AM Jr. Biophysical and chemical considerations in cryopreservation. In: Karow AM Jr, Pegg DE ed. Organ Preservation for Transplantation. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 1981: 113–41.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Takahashi T. Freezing injury of animal cell and mechanism of protective action of cryo-protectants. In: Sakai A, ed. Cryopresevation. Tokyo: Asakura Shoten, 1987: 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dowell LG, Rinfret AP. Low-temperature forms of ice as studied by X-ray diffraction. Nature 1960; 31: 1144–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kashima, I., Yozu, R., Shin, H. et al. Effect of storage temperature on cell viability in cryopreserved canine aortic, pulmonic, mitral, and tricuspid valve homografts. Jpn J Thorac Caridovasc Surg 47, 153–157 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217961

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217961

Index words

Navigation