Skip to main content
Log in

Early mathematics development and later achievement: Further evidence

Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

There is a growing international recognition of the importance of the early years of schooling as well as an interest being shown in the relationship of early education to later achievement. This article focuses on a cohort of English pupils who have been tracked through primary school during the first five years of the new National Numeracy Strategy. It reports a limited longitudinal study of young children’s early mathematical development, initially within three testing cycles: at the mid-point and towards the end of their reception year (at five years-of-age) and again at the mid-point of Year 1 (at six years-ofage). These cycles were located within the broader context of progress through to the end of Key Stage 1 (at seven years) and Key Stage 2 (at eleven years) on the basis of national standardised assessment tests (SATs). Results showed that children who bring into school early mathematical knowledge do appear to be advantaged in terms of their mathematical progress through primary school. Numerical attainment increases in importance across the primary years and practical problem solving remains an important element of this. This finding is significant given the current emphasis on numerical calculation in the English curriculum. It is concluded that without active intervention, it is likely that children with little mathematical knowledge at the beginning of formal schooling will remain low achievers throughout their primary years and, probably, beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & Wiliam, D. (1997).Effective teachers of numeracy. Final report. London: Kings College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubrey, C. (1993). An investigation of the mathematical subject knowledge and competences that young children bring into school.British Journal of Educational Research, 19(1), 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubrey, C. (1997).Mathematics teaching in the early years. An investigation of teachers’ subject knowledge. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubrey, C., & Godfrey, R. (1999).The development of early numeracy in England. Poster presentation at European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Gothenburg.

  • Aubrey, C., & Godfrey, R. (2003). The development of children’s early numeracy through Key Stage 1.British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 821–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., Askew, M., Baker, D., Denvir, H., & Millett, A. (1998). Is the national numeracy strategy research-based?British Journal of Educational Studies, 46(4), 362–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., Askew, M., Millett, A., & Rhodes, V. (2003). The key role of educational research in the development and evaluation of the National Numeracy Strategy.British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 655–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., Millett, A., Bibby, T., & Johnson, D. (2000). Turning our attention from the what to the how: The National Numeracy Strategy.British Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. C. (1988). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of students problem-solving in elementary arithmetic.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(5), 385–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. M. (2000).The early numeracy research project: Some insights from an exciting first year. Paper presented at the High Expectations — Outstanding Achievement: The Early Years of Schooling P — 4 conference, Melbourne.

  • Cockcroft, W. H. (1982).Mathematics counts: Report of the committee of inquiry into the teaching of mathematics in schools under the chairmanship of Dr W. H. Cockcroft. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lemos, M., & Doig, B. (1999).From research to practice: Who am I? — A tool for school entry assessment. Paper presented at the Third Warwick International Early Years Conference, Coventry, UK.

  • Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. (2000).Numeracy, a priority for all: Challenges for Australian schools. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. (2004).Researching numeracy teaching approaches in primary schools. Retrieved September, 8, 2004 from: http://www.dest.gov.au/schools/publications/2004/numeracy/researching_numeracy/i

  • Doig, B., & de Lemos, M. (2000).I can do maths. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doig, B., McCrae, B., & Rowe, K. (2003).A good start to numeracy. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing-Rogers, J., & Cowen, R. (1996). Children as apprentices to number.Early Childhood Development and Care, 125, 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., & Peterson, P. L. (1989). Learning mathematics with understanding: Cognitively guided instruction. In J. Brophy (Ed.),Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 1 (pp. 195–222). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. (1986).Children and number. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meaney, T. (2001). An indigenous community doing mathematics curriculum development.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merttens, R., & Vass, J. (1990).Sharing maths cultures: Inventing maths for parents and children and teachers. (IMPACT). Basingstoke: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J., Michelmore, M., Outred, L., & Russell, S. (1997). Second graders’ representation and conceptual understanding of numbers. A longitudinal study. In F. Biddulph & K. Carr (Eds.),People in mathematics education (Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 2, pp. 361–368). Rotorua: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, P., & Shaffer, H. R. (1993). Literacy and numeracy events in social interactive contexts.International Journal of Early Years Education, 1(3), 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2001).Starting strong: Early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B. (1999).Early childhood numeracy: Contextual paper (Draft). Adelaide: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.

  • Press, F., & Hayes, A. (2000).OECD thematic review of early childhood education and care policy: Australian background report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. S. (2001).Dialogue on early childhood science, mathematics and technology education: First experiences in science, mathematics and technology — early childhood mathematics. Retrieved 20 September, 2005 from: http://www.project2061.org/publications/earlychild/online/experience/smith.htm

  • Stevenenson, H., & Stigler, J. (1992).The learning gap. Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suggate, J., Aubrey, C., & Pettitt, D. (1997). The number knowledge of four- to five-year-olds at school entry and at the end of their first year.European Early Educational Research Journal, 5(2), 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tymms, P. (1999). Baseline assessment, value-added and the prediction of reading.Journal of Research in Reading, 22(1), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tymms, P., Merrell, C., & Henderson, B. (1997) The first year at school. Aquantitative investigation of the attainment and progress of pupils.Educational Research and Evaluation 3(2), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Rijt, B. A. M., Godfrey, R., Aubrey, C., van Luit, J., Guesquiere, P., Torbeyns, S. L., Haseman, K., Tancig, S., Kavkler, M., Magajna, L., & Tzouriadou, M. (2003). The development of early numeracy in Europe.Journal of Early Childhood Research, 1( 2), 155–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Luit, E. E. H., van de Rijt, B. A. M., & Pennings, A. H. (1994.)Utrechtse getalbegrip toets (Early Numeracy Test). Doetinchem, The Netherlands: Graviant.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Tuill, C., Leseman, P. P. M., & Rispens, J. (2001). Efficacy of an intensive homebased educational intervention programme for 4- to 6-year-old ethnic minority children in the Netherlands.International Journal of Behavioural Development, 25(2), 148–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young-Loveridge, J., Peters, S., & Carr, M. (1997). Enhancing the mathematics of four-year-olds. An overview of the EMI-4S Study.Journal for Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 2, 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aubrey, C., Godfrey, R. & Dahl, S. Early mathematics development and later achievement: Further evidence. Math Ed Res J 18, 27–46 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217428

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217428

Keywords

Navigation