Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 27–46 | Cite as

Early mathematics development and later achievement: Further evidence

  • Carol Aubrey
  • Ray Godfrey
  • Sarah Dahl
Articles

Abstract

There is a growing international recognition of the importance of the early years of schooling as well as an interest being shown in the relationship of early education to later achievement. This article focuses on a cohort of English pupils who have been tracked through primary school during the first five years of the new National Numeracy Strategy. It reports a limited longitudinal study of young children’s early mathematical development, initially within three testing cycles: at the mid-point and towards the end of their reception year (at five years-of-age) and again at the mid-point of Year 1 (at six years-ofage). These cycles were located within the broader context of progress through to the end of Key Stage 1 (at seven years) and Key Stage 2 (at eleven years) on the basis of national standardised assessment tests (SATs). Results showed that children who bring into school early mathematical knowledge do appear to be advantaged in terms of their mathematical progress through primary school. Numerical attainment increases in importance across the primary years and practical problem solving remains an important element of this. This finding is significant given the current emphasis on numerical calculation in the English curriculum. It is concluded that without active intervention, it is likely that children with little mathematical knowledge at the beginning of formal schooling will remain low achievers throughout their primary years and, probably, beyond.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & Wiliam, D. (1997).Effective teachers of numeracy. Final report. London: Kings College.Google Scholar
  2. Aubrey, C. (1993). An investigation of the mathematical subject knowledge and competences that young children bring into school.British Journal of Educational Research, 19(1), 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aubrey, C. (1997).Mathematics teaching in the early years. An investigation of teachers’ subject knowledge. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  4. Aubrey, C., & Godfrey, R. (1999).The development of early numeracy in England. Poster presentation at European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  5. Aubrey, C., & Godfrey, R. (2003). The development of children’s early numeracy through Key Stage 1.British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 821–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, M., Askew, M., Baker, D., Denvir, H., & Millett, A. (1998). Is the national numeracy strategy research-based?British Journal of Educational Studies, 46(4), 362–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, M., Askew, M., Millett, A., & Rhodes, V. (2003). The key role of educational research in the development and evaluation of the National Numeracy Strategy.British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 655–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, M., Millett, A., Bibby, T., & Johnson, D. (2000). Turning our attention from the what to the how: The National Numeracy Strategy.British Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. C. (1988). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of students problem-solving in elementary arithmetic.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(5), 385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, D. M. (2000).The early numeracy research project: Some insights from an exciting first year. Paper presented at the High Expectations — Outstanding Achievement: The Early Years of Schooling P — 4 conference, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  11. Cockcroft, W. H. (1982).Mathematics counts: Report of the committee of inquiry into the teaching of mathematics in schools under the chairmanship of Dr W. H. Cockcroft. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  12. de Lemos, M., & Doig, B. (1999).From research to practice: Who am I? — A tool for school entry assessment. Paper presented at the Third Warwick International Early Years Conference, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. (2000).Numeracy, a priority for all: Challenges for Australian schools. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  14. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. (2004).Researching numeracy teaching approaches in primary schools. Retrieved September, 8, 2004 from: http://www.dest.gov.au/schools/publications/2004/numeracy/researching_numeracy/iGoogle Scholar
  15. Doig, B., & de Lemos, M. (2000).I can do maths. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  16. Doig, B., McCrae, B., & Rowe, K. (2003).A good start to numeracy. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  17. Ewing-Rogers, J., & Cowen, R. (1996). Children as apprentices to number.Early Childhood Development and Care, 125, 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., & Peterson, P. L. (1989). Learning mathematics with understanding: Cognitively guided instruction. In J. Brophy (Ed.),Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 1 (pp. 195–222). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hughes, M. (1986).Children and number. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Meaney, T. (2001). An indigenous community doing mathematics curriculum development.Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Merttens, R., & Vass, J. (1990).Sharing maths cultures: Inventing maths for parents and children and teachers. (IMPACT). Basingstoke: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mulligan, J., Michelmore, M., Outred, L., & Russell, S. (1997). Second graders’ representation and conceptual understanding of numbers. A longitudinal study. In F. Biddulph & K. Carr (Eds.),People in mathematics education (Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 2, pp. 361–368). Rotorua: MERGA.Google Scholar
  23. Munn, P., & Shaffer, H. R. (1993). Literacy and numeracy events in social interactive contexts.International Journal of Early Years Education, 1(3), 61–80.Google Scholar
  24. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2001).Starting strong: Early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  25. Perry, B. (1999).Early childhood numeracy: Contextual paper (Draft). Adelaide: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.Google Scholar
  26. Press, F., & Hayes, A. (2000).OECD thematic review of early childhood education and care policy: Australian background report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, S. S. (2001).Dialogue on early childhood science, mathematics and technology education: First experiences in science, mathematics and technology — early childhood mathematics. Retrieved 20 September, 2005 from: http://www.project2061.org/publications/earlychild/online/experience/smith.htmGoogle Scholar
  28. Stevenenson, H., & Stigler, J. (1992).The learning gap. Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit Books.Google Scholar
  29. Suggate, J., Aubrey, C., & Pettitt, D. (1997). The number knowledge of four- to five-year-olds at school entry and at the end of their first year.European Early Educational Research Journal, 5(2), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tymms, P. (1999). Baseline assessment, value-added and the prediction of reading.Journal of Research in Reading, 22(1), 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tymms, P., Merrell, C., & Henderson, B. (1997) The first year at school. Aquantitative investigation of the attainment and progress of pupils.Educational Research and Evaluation 3(2), 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van de Rijt, B. A. M., Godfrey, R., Aubrey, C., van Luit, J., Guesquiere, P., Torbeyns, S. L., Haseman, K., Tancig, S., Kavkler, M., Magajna, L., & Tzouriadou, M. (2003). The development of early numeracy in Europe.Journal of Early Childhood Research, 1( 2), 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van Luit, E. E. H., van de Rijt, B. A. M., & Pennings, A. H. (1994.)Utrechtse getalbegrip toets (Early Numeracy Test). Doetinchem, The Netherlands: Graviant.Google Scholar
  34. van Tuill, C., Leseman, P. P. M., & Rispens, J. (2001). Efficacy of an intensive homebased educational intervention programme for 4- to 6-year-old ethnic minority children in the Netherlands.International Journal of Behavioural Development, 25(2), 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Young-Loveridge, J., Peters, S., & Carr, M. (1997). Enhancing the mathematics of four-year-olds. An overview of the EMI-4S Study.Journal for Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 2, 82–93.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol Aubrey
    • 1
  • Ray Godfrey
    • 2
  • Sarah Dahl
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of EducationUniversity of WarwickWestwood CoventryUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Canterbury Christ Church UniversityCanterburyUnited Kingdom
  3. 3.University of Warwick. Institute of EducationWestwood, CoventryUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations