Skip to main content
Log in

Children’s solutions to multiplication and division word problems: A longitudinal study

  • Article
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Children’s solution strategies to a variety of multiplication and division word problems were analysed at four interview stages in a 2-year longitudinal study. The study followed 70 children from Year 2 into Year 3, from the time where they had received no formal instruction in multiplication and division to the stage where they were being taught basic multiplication facts. Ten problem structures, five for multiplication and five for division, were classified on the basis of differences in semantic structure. The relationship between problem condition (i.e. small or large number combinations and use of physical objects or pictures), on performance and strategy use was also examined.

The results indicated that 75% of the children were able to solve the problems using a wide variety of strategies even though they had not received formal instruction in multiplication or division for most of the 2 year period. Performance level generally increased for each interview stage, but few differences were found between multiplication and division problems except for Cartesian and Factor problems.

Solution strategies were classified for both multiplication and division problems at three levels:

  1. (i)

    direct modelling with counting;

  2. (ii)

    no direct modelling, with counting, additive or subtractive strategies;

  3. (iii)

    use of known or derived facts (addition, multiplication).

A wide range of counting strategies were classified as counting-all, skip counting and double counting. Analysis of intuitive models revealed preference for a repeated addition model for multiplication, and a ‘building-up’ model for division.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anghileri, J. (1985). Should we say times?Mathematics in School, 14, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anghileri, J. (1989). An investigation of young children’s understanding of multiplication.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20 (4), 367–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., Costello, J., & Kuchmann, D. (1981).A review of research in mathematical education: research on learning and teaching. London: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., Fischbein, E., & Greer, B. (1984). Choice of operation in verbal arithmetic problems: The effects of number size, problem structure and context.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., Greer, B., Grimison, L., & Mangan, C. (1989). Children’s performance on multiplicative word problems: Elements of a descriptive theory.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(5), 434–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boero, P., Ferrari, P., & Ferrero, E. (1989). Division problems: Meanings and procedures in the transition to a written algorithm.For the Learning of Mathematics, 9 (3), 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, L. (1981). Child-methods in secondary mathematics.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briars, D.J., & Larkin, J.H. (1984). An integrated model of skill in solving elementary word problems.Cognition and Instruction, 1, 245–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.L., & Kuchemann, D.E. (1976). Is it an add, Miss? Part I.Mathematics in School, 5 (5), 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.L., & Kuchemann, D.E. (1977). Is it an add, Miss? Part II.Mathematics in School, 6 (1), 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.L. (1981). Number operations. In K.M. Hart (Ed.),Children understanding mathematics: 11–16 (pp. 23–48). London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T.P., Hiebert, J., & Moser, J.M. (1981). Problem structure and first grade children’s solution processes for simple addition and subtraction problems.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12 (1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T.P., & Moser, J.M. (1982). The development of addition and subtraction problem-solving skills. In T.P. Carpenter, J.M. Moser & T.A. Romberg (Eds.),Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 9–25). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T.P., & Moser, J.M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15 (3), 179–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T.P., Moser, J.M., & Bebout, H.C. (1988). Representation of addition and subtraction word problems.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T.P., Moser, J.M., & Romberg, T.A. (Eds.) (1982).Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., & Merkel, G. (1989). Thinking strategies: Teaching arithmetic through problem solving. In P.R. Trafton & A.P. Shulte (Eds.),New directions in elementary school mathematics (pp.70–85). Reston, Virginia: N.C.T.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1987). The effect of semantic structure on first grader’s strategies for solving addition and subtraction word problems.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18 (5), 363–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Van Coillie, V. (1988). Influence of problem structure, and response mode on children’s solutions of multiplication word problems.Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 7, 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1989). Teaching word problems in the primary school: What research has to say to the teacher. In B. Greer & G. Mulhern (Eds.),New directions in mathematics education (pp. 85–107). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M., & Merino, M. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K. (1982). An analysis of the counting-on solution procedure in addition. In T.P. Carpenter, J.M. Moser & T.A. Romberg (Eds.),Addition & subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 67–81). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C.R. (1978).The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. (1977).Children’s arithmetic: The learning process. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. (1983).The development of mathematical thinking. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, B., & Mulhern, G. (Eds.). (1989).New directions in mathematics education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groen, G., & Resnick, L. (1977). Can preschool children invent addition algorithms?Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 645–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K.M. (Ed.). (1981).Children’s understanding of mathematics: 11–16. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J. (1984). Children’s mathematics learning: The struggle to link form and understanding.The Elementary School Journal, 5, 497–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Behr, M. (1989).Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (Vol.2). Reston, Virginia: Erlbaum/N.C.T.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J. (1990). The role of routine procedures in the development of mathematical competence. In T.J. Cooney & C.R. Hirsch (Eds.),Teaching and learning mathematics in the I990’s (pp. 31–41). Reston, Virginia: N.C.T.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. (1986).Children and number. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunting, R.P. (1989). What does the last decade of rational number research offer the classroom teacher? In N.F. Ellerton & M.A. Clements (Eds.),School mathematics: The challenge to change (pp. 188–217). Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keranto, T. (1984).Processes and strategies in solving elementary verbal multiplication and division tasks: Their relationship with Piagetian abilities, memory capacity skills and rational number. Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere, Department of Teacher Training. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED239906)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1986). Learning from text.Cognition and Instruction, 3, 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J. (1987). What constructivism might be in mathematics education. InProceedings of the 11th Annual Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol.1, pp. 3–27). Montreal: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouba, V.L. (1986, April).How children solve multiplication and division word problems. Paper presented at the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Research Pre-Session, Washington, D.C.

  • Kouba, V.L. (1989). Children’s solution strategies for equivalent set multiplication and division word problems.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20 (2), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labinowicz, E. (1985).Learning from children: New beginnings for teaching numerical thinking. Menlo Park: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, P. (1988). Arithmetical word problems: Evidence for thinking on the table.Research in Mathematics Education in Australia, June, 1–7. Lesh, R., & Landau, M. (Eds.) (1983).Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J.T. (1988). Children’s solutions to story problems.Prime Number, 3 (4), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J.T. (1991a, July).The role of intuitive models in young children’s solutions to multiplication and division word problems. Paper presented to the 15th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Perth.

  • Mulligan, J.T. (1991b). Multiplication and division — what we can use for the classroom.Challenging Children to Think When They Compute. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology, Centre for Mathematics, Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesher, P. (1982). Levels of description in the analysis of addition and subtraction word problems. In T.P Carpenter., J.M. Moser, & T.A. Romberg (Eds.),Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 25–39). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesher, P. (1988). Multiplicative school word problems: Theoretical approaches and empirical findings. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.),Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (Vol.2, pp. 19–40). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, M., Greeno, J., & Heller, J. (1983). Development of children’s problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In H. Ginsburg (Ed.),The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 153–192). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. (1988). Referent preserving and referent transforming operations on qualities. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.),Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (Vol. 2, pp. 41–52). Reston, Virginia: Erlbaum/N.C.T.M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowder, L. (1988). Children’s solutions of story problems.Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 7, 227–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L. (1983). Children’s algorithms as schemes.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 109–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L. (1988). Children’s construction of number sequences and multiplying schemes. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.),Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (Vol.2, pp.119–140). Reston, Virginia: Erlbaum/ NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L., Cobb, P., & Richards, V. (1988).Construction of arithmetic meanings and strategies. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L., Von Glasersfeld, E., Richards, J, & Cobb, P. (1983).Children’s counting types: Philosophy, theory and application. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L., & Wood, T. (1990).Transforming children’s mathematics education: International perspectives. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, G. (1988). Multiplicative structures. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.),Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (Vol.2, pp.141–161). Reston, Virginia: Erlbaum/N.C.T.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1985). Reconstructing the concept of knowledge.Achives de Psychologie, 53, 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulligan, J. Children’s solutions to multiplication and division word problems: A longitudinal study. Math Ed Res J 4, 24–41 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217230

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217230

Keywords

Navigation