This essay brings together two lines of inquiry. Firstly, I revisit research on futures in education conducted during the 1980s and re-examine some of the propositions and principles that this research generated about “the future” as an object of inquiry in education. Secondly, I argue that the language of complexity invites us to rethink education in terms of emergence, and potentially destabilises the instrumentalist rationality that “programs” educational systems to privilege orderly and predictable processes culminating in stable output, a potentiality that may be undermined by a pervasive politics of complexity reduction. I conclude by drawing upon these two lines of inquiry to outline some strategies that might resist complexity reduction and catalyse emergence in Australian educational research as preconditions for inventing possible∼impossible futures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Allan, J. (2010, 7 April). Quality criteria have no standing in law.The Australian. Retrieved April 9, 2010, from http://tiny.cc/q47le
Angus, M., Olney, H., & Ainley, J. (2007).In the balance: The future of Australia’s primary schools. Kaleen, ACT: Australian Primary Principals’ Association.
Appelbaum, P. (2010). Foreword. In J. A. Weaver,Educating the posthuman: Biosciences, fiction, and curriculum studies (pp. vii-xii). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Atkinson, E. (2000). In defence of ideas, or why “what works” is not enough.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(3), 317–330.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008).Australian and New Zealand standard research classification. Retrieved 27 November, 2008, from http://tiny.cc/tp1fq
Barlow, J. P. (1996).A Declaration of the independence of cyberspace. Retrieved 1 June, 2010, from http://tiny.cc/0bju5
Beare, H., & Millikan, R. (Eds.) (1988).A report of the project “Skilling the Australian community: futures for public education” sponsored by the Australian Teachers’ Federation and the Commission for the Future. Parkville: University of Melbourne, Faculty of Education.
Beare, H., & Slaughter, R. (1993).Education for the Twenty-first Century. London and New York: Routledge.
Beauchamp, G. A. (1968).Curriculum theory (2nd ed.). Wilmette, IL: The Kagg Press.
Bedau, M. A. (1997). Weak emergence. In James Tomberlin (Ed.),Philosophical perspectives 11: Mind, causation, and world (pp. 375–399). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Bedau, M. A. (2008). Is weak emergence just in the mind?Minds and Machines, 18(4), 443–459.
Biesta, G. (2004). “Mind the gap!” Communication and the educational relation. In C. Bingham & A. M. Sidorkin (Eds.),No education without relation (pp. 11–22). New York: Peter Lang.
Biesta, G. (2006).Beyond learning. Democratic education for a human future. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work. Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit of educational research.Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.
Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education.Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46.
Biesta, G. (2010). Five theses on complexity reduction and its politics. In D. Osberg & G. Biesta (Eds.),Complexity theory and the politics of education (pp. 5–14). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Biesta, G., & Osberg, D. (2010). Complexity, education and politics from the insideout and the outside-in: An introduction. In D. Osberg & G. Biesta (Eds.),Complexity theory and the politics of education (pp. 1–3). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Blaikie, N. W. H. (1991). A critique of the use of triangulation in social research.Quality and Quantity, 25(2), 115–136.
Boulton, G., & Lucas, C. (2008).What are universities for? Leuven: League of European Research Universities.
Bradbury, R. (1953). The Murderer. InThe golden apples of the sun (pp. 49–57). New York: Doubleday.
Browne, R. K., & McGaw, B. (1974). Research in progress: Delphi teacher education policy study.Australian Journal of Education, 1(2), 7–10.
Bussey, M., Inayatullah, S., & Milojevic, I. (Eds.) (2008).Alternative educational futures: Pedagogies for emergent worlds. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Capek, K. (1923).R.U.R. (P. Selver, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castellani, B. (2009).Map of complexity science. Retrieved 2 June, 2010, from http://tiny.cc/58wu6
Castellani, B., & Hafferty, F. (2009).Sociology and complexity science: A New field of inquiry. Berlin: Springer.
Casti, J. L. (1997).Would-be worlds: How simulation is changing the frontiers of science. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Cherryholmes, C. (1987). A social project for curriculum: post-structural perspectives,Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 295–316.
Cherryholmes, C. (1988).Power and criticism: Poststructural investigations in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cilliers, P. (1998).Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.
Cilliers, P. (2010). Acknowledging complexity: A foreword. In D. Osberg & G. Biesta (Eds.),Complexity theory and the politics of education (pp. vii-viii). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Clarke, A. C. (1962).Profiles of the future: An inquiry into the limits of the possible. London: Victor Gollancz.
Colander, D. (Ed.) (2000).The complexity vision and the teaching of economics. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Derrida, J. (1989). Psyche: Inventions of the other (C. Porter, Trans.). In W. Godzich & L. Waters (Eds.),Reading de Man reading (pp. 25–65). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Derrida, J. (1992a). Force of law: The “mystical foundation of authority” (M. Quaintance, Trans.). In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld & D. G. Carlson (Eds.),Deconstruction and the possibility of justice (pp. 3–67). New York: Routledge.
Derrida, J. (1992b).The other heading: Reflections on today’s Europe (P.-A. Brault & M. Naas, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Doll, W. E. (1986). Prigogine: A new sense of order, a new curriculum.Theory into Practice, 25(1), 10–16.
Doll, W. E. (1989). Foundations for a post-modern curriculum.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(3), 243–253.
Doll, W. E. (1993).A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
Duhl, L. (2001). The future, complexity, death and surprise.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55(4), 218.
Eckersley, R. (1987).Australian attitudes to science and technology and the future. Melbourne: Commission for the Future.
Eckersley, R. (1988).Casualties of change: The predicament of youth in Australia. Melbourne: Commission for the Future.
Eckersley, R. (1997). Portraits of youth: Understanding young people’s relationship with the future.Futures, 29(3), 243–249.
Eldredge, H. W. (1973). A mark II survey and critique of future research teaching in North America.Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 4(4), 387–407.
Electronic Frontier Foundation (1990).Formation documents and mission statement for the EFF. Retrieved 1 June, 2010, from http://tiny.cc/araxl
Emery, F., Emery, M., Caldwell, G., & Crombie, A. (1974).Futures we’re in. Canberra: Centre for Continuing Education, Australian National University.
Emery, M., & Purser, R. E. (1996).The Search Conference: A powerful method for planning organizational change and community action. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Engel, F. (1988).21 Years of Australian Frontier: An extraordinary organisation for extraordinary times, 1962–1983. Melbourne: Australian Frontier.
Ennis, C. D. (1992). Reconceptualizing learning as a dynamical system.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7(2), 115–130.
Gage, N. L. (1963). Paradigms for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.),The handbook of research on teaching (pp. 94–141). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Gage, N. L. (1985).Hard gains in the soft sciences. Bloomington IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
Gage, N. L. (1989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A “historical” sketch of research on teaching since 1989.Educational Researcher, 18(7), 4–10.
Gibson, W. (1982, July). Burning chrome.Omni, 4, 72–107.
Gibson, W. (1984).Neuromancer. New York: Ace.
Gillard, J. (2010, 3 March).Media release: Government to introduce “My University” website. Retrieved 5 March, 2010, from http://tiny.cc/sceio
Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues.Emergence: A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management, 1(1), 49–72.
Gough, N. (1981). Futures study in teacher education.South Pacific Journal for Teacher Education, 9(2), 48–57.
Gough, N. (1986). Futures in curriculum.Curriculum Perspectives, 6(2), 53–54.
Gough, N. (1988). Futures in curriculum: The anticipatory generation of alternatives.Melbourne Studies in Education, 29(1), 23–34.
Gough, N. (1989). Seven principles for exploring futures in the curriculum. In R. A. Slaughter (Ed.),Studying the future: An introductory reader (pp. 51–59). Melbourne: The Commission for the Future and The Australian Bicentennial Authority.
Gough, N. (1990). Futures in Australian education: Tacit, token and taken for granted.Futures, 22(3), 298–310.
Gough, N. (1991). Coyote, crocodile, chaos and curriculum: Premodern lessons for postmodern learning. In J. H. Baldwin (Ed.),Confronting environmental challenges in a changing world: Selected papers from the twentieth Annual Conference of the North American Association for Environmental Education (pp. 114–117). Troy OH: North American Association for Environmental Education.
Gough, N. (2004). Narrative experiments: manifesting cyborgs in curriculum inquiry. In J. A. Weaver, K. Anijar & T. Daspit (Eds.),Science fiction curriculum, cyborg teachers, and youth culture(s) (pp. 89–108). New York: Peter Lang.
Gough, N. (2007). Changing planes: Rhizosemiotic play in transnational curriculum inquiry.Studies in Philosophy and Education, 26(3), 279–294.
Gough, N. (2008). Narrative experiments and imaginative inquiry.South African Journal of Education, 28(3), 335–349.
Gough, N. (2009). No country for young people? Anxieties in Australian society and education.Australian Educational Researcher, 36(2), 1–19.
Gough, N. (2010a). Lost children and anxious adults: Responding to complexity in Australian education and society. In D. Osberg & G. Biesta (Eds.),Complexity theory and the politics of education (pp. 39–55). Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.
Gough, N. (2010b). Performing imaginative inquiry: narrative experiments and rhizosemiotic play. In T. W. Nielsen, R. Fitzgerald & M. Fettes (Eds.),Imagination in educational theory and practice: A many-sided vision (pp. 42–60). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Green, B. (2010). The (im)possibility of the project.The Australian Educational Researcher, 37(3), 1–17.
Green, B., & Bigum, C. (1993). Governing chaos: postmodern science, information technology, and educational administration.Educational Philosophy and Theory, 25(2), 79–103.
Griffin, P. (1986).Predicted futures and curriculum change. Melbourne: Ministry of Education.
Gross, B. M. (1964).The managing of organizations: The administrative struggle. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Haraway, D. J. (1989).Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge.
Hargreaves, D. H. (1996).Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects. [Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture] London: Teacher Training Agency.
Hargreaves, D. H. (1997). In defence of research for evidence-based teaching: A rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley.British Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 405–419.
Hartley, H. J. (1965). Bureaucracy, rationality, and educational innovation.The Clearing House, 40(1), 3–7.
Hayles, N. K. (1990).Chaos bound: Orderly disorder in contemporary literature and science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hayles, N. K. (1994). Boundary disputes: Homeostasis, reflexivity, and the foundations of cybernetics.Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science, and Technology, 2(3), 441–467.
Hayles, N. K. (Ed.) (1991).Chaos and order: Complex dynamics in literature and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Henry, M., & Thomson, P. (Eds.) (1980).Future directions, 1980 conference report. Melbourne: Australian Frontier.
Hicks, D. (2008). A futures perspective: lessons from the school room. In M. Bussey, S. Inayatullah, & I. Milojevic (Eds.),Alternative educational futures: Pedagogies for emergent worlds (pp. 75–89). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Hicks, D., & Slaughter, R. (Eds.) (1998).Futures education. London: Kogan Page.
Hillage, J., Pearson, R., Anderson, A., & Tamkin, P. (1998).Excellence in research on schools. London: Institute For Employment Studies for the Department for Education and Employment.
Holbrook, A. (1992). Teachers with vision and visions of teaching: The role of futures studies and research in post-graduate teacher education.Futures Research Quarterly, 8(4), 27–48.
Hunkins, F. P. (1980).Curriculum development: Program improvement. Columbus OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Hutchinson, F. P. (1996).Educating beyond violent futures. London and New York: Routledge.
Huxley, A. (1932).Brave new world. London: Chatto and Windus.
Inayatullah, S., Bussey, M., & Milojevic, I. (Eds.) (2006).Neohumanist educational futures: Liberating the pedagogical intellect. Tamsui and Taipei: Tamkang University.
Inayatullah, S., & Gidley, J. (Eds.) (2000).The university in transformation: Global perspectives on the futures of the university. Westport CT and London: Bergin and Garvey.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come.Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Jones, B. O. (1982).Sleepers, wake! Technology and the future of work. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Kim, J. (1999). Making sense of emergence.Philosophical Studies, 95(1–2), 3–36.
Lather, P. (1991).Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
Le Guin, U. (1984). The author of the Acacia seeds and other extracts from the Journal of the Association of Therolinguistics. InThe compass rose (pp. 11–19). London: Grafton Books.
Massey, A. (1999). Methodological triangulation, or how to get lost without being found out. In A. Massey & G. Walford (Eds.),Explorations in methodology (pp. 183–197). Stamford: J A I Press.
McDaniel, R. R., & Driebe, D. J. (Eds.). (2005).Uncertainty and surprise in complex systems. Berlin: Springer.
McDaniel, R. R., Jordan, M. E., & Fleeman, B. F. (2003). Surprise, surprise, surprise! A complexity science view of the unexpected.Health Care Management Review, 28(3), 266–278.
McGaw, B., Browne, R. K., & Rees, P. (1976). Delphi in education: Review and assessment.Australian Journal of Education, 20(1), 59–76.
Milojevic, I., & Inayatullah, S. (2003). Futures dreaming outside and on the margins of the western world.Futures, 35(5), 493–507.
Mochelle, R. (1986). Future choice: an environment design approach.Curriculum Perspectives, 6(2), 52.
Murphy, M. (2009). Bureaucracy and its limits: accountability and rationality in higher education.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(6), 683–695.
Neale, M. (Director). (2000).No maps for these territories [Motion picture]. UK: Docudrama.
Noyce, P. (Ed.). (1986).Futures in education: Conference report. Melbourne: Hawthorn Institute of Education and the Commission for the Future.
O’Brien, P. W. (1976). Futures research in education.Australian Journal of Education, 20(1), 46–58.
Orwell, G. (1949).Nineteen eighty-four. London: Secker.
Osberg, D. (2010). Taking care of the future? The complex responsibility of education and politics. In D. Osberg & G. Biesta (Eds.),Complexity theory and the politics of education (pp. 157–170). Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.
Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2007). Beyond presence: Epistemological and pedagogical implications of “strong” emergence.Interchange, 38(1), 31–51.
Parker, W. C., Ninomiya, A., & Cogan, J. (1999). Educating world citizens: toward multinational curriculum development.American Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 117–145.
Pickett, S. T. A., & White, P. S. (Eds.). (1985).The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.
Pinar, W. F. (Ed.). (1975).Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Pinar, W. F., & Reynolds, W. M. (1992). Appendix: Genealogical notes — the history of phenomenology and post-structuralism in curriculum studies. In W. F. Pinar & W. M. Reynolds (Eds.),Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text (pp. 237–261). New York: Teachers College Press.
Pratt, D. (1980).Curriculum: Design and development. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Prigogine, I. (1980).From being to becoming. San Francisco: W. W. Freeman.
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984).Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam.
Ross, A. (1994).The Chicago gangster theory of life: Nature’s debt to society. London and New York: Verso.
Sawada, D., & Caley, M. T. (1985). Dissipative structures: New metaphors for becoming in education.Educational Researcher, 14(3), 13–19.
Scheurich, J. J., & Young, M. D. (1997). Coloring epistemologies: Are our research epistemologies racially biased?Educational Researcher, 26(4), 4–16.
Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum.School Review, 78(1), 1–23.
Schwab, J. J. (1971). The practical: Arts of eclectic.School Review, 79(4), 493–454.
Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum.School Review, 81(4), 501–522.
Sellers, W. (2008).Picturing currere towards c u r a: Rhizo-imaginary for curriculum. Unpublished PhD thesis, Deakin University, Melbourne.
Slaughter, R. A. (1986). Critical futures study: A dimension of curriculum work.Curriculum Perspectives, 6(2), 64–68.
Slaughter, R. A. (1992). Australia’s Commission for the Future: The first six years.Futures, 24(2), 268–276.
Slaughter, R. A. (1999).Futures for the third millennium: Enabling the forward view. St Leonards NSW: Prospect Media Ltd.
Slaughter, R. A. (Ed.). (1989).Studying the future: An introductory reader. Melbourne: The Commission for the Future and The Australian Bicentennial Authority.
Smith, B. O., Stanley, W. O., & Shores, J. H. (1957).Fundamentals of curriculum development (Rev. ed.). New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Stanley, D. (2009). Complexity and the phenomenological structure of “surprise”.Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 11(2). Retrieved 11 June 2009, from http://tiny.cc/f1k7b
Stenhouse, L. (1975).An Introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
Sterling, B. (1985).Schismatrix. New York: Ace.
Sterling, B. (1987).The artificial kid. New York: Ace.
Sterling, B. (1989).Islands in the net. New York: Ace.
Sterling, B. (1990).Crystal express. New York: Ace.
Surowiecki, J. (2004).The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. New York: Doubleday.
Taylor, F. W. (1947).Scientific management. New York: Harper and Brothers. (Original work published 1911)
Thomas, G. (2010). Evidence began in 1998.Research Intelligence: News from the British Educational Research Association, (109), 14–15.
Thrift, N. (1999). The place of complexity.Theory Culture and Society, 16(3), 31–69.
Toffler, A. (1970).Future shock. New York: Random House.
Tooley, J., & Darby, D. (1998).Educational research: A critique. London: Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED).
Tydeman, J. (1987).Futures methodologies handbook: An overview of futures research methodologies and techniques. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service for the Commission for the Future.
Ulanowicz, R. E. (2009).A third window: Natural life beyond Newton and Darwin. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
Wagner, J. (1993). Ignorance in educational research: Or, how can younot know that?Educational Researcher, 22(5), 15–23.
Weaver, J. A. (2010).Educating the posthuman: Biosciences, fiction, and curriculum studies. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Weaver, W. (1948). Science and complexity.American Scientist, 35, 536.
Wiener, N. (1948).Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Wilson, N. (1987). The state of the planet and of young people’s minds.Ethos (Annual Journal of the Victorian Association of Social Studies Teachers), 9–13.
Worster, D. (1993).The wealth of nature: Environmental history and the ecological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Worster, D. (1995). Nature and the disorder of history. In M. E. Soulé & G. Lease (Eds.),Reinventing nature? Responses to postmodern deconstruction (pp. 65–85). Washington DC: Island Press.
About this article
Cite this article
Gough, N. Can we escape the program? Inventing possible∼impossible futures in/for Australian educational research. Aust. Educ. Res. 37, 9–42 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216935
- Educational Research
- Educational Researcher
- Science Fiction
- Complexity Reduction
- Predictable Process