Skip to main content
Log in

National gender equity and schooling policy in Australia: Struggles for a non-identitarian feminist politics

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper tracks the development of gender equity and schooling policy in Australia from theNational Policy on the Education of Girls in 1987, to current policy concerns with boys’ educational underperformance. The paper’s key focus is on the ways in which feminist informed equity policy has been undermined by broader imperatives of economic rationalism and anti-feminist discourses. Drawing on Nancy Fraser’s understandings of distributive and cultural gender justice and her notion of a nonidentitarian feminist politics, the paper critically examines the ways in which such imperatives have re-articulated equity and schooling concerns. Through these lenses, the limitations of the affirmative gender binary politics and remedies that have dominated gender and schooling reform in Australia are highlighted. The paper concludes with an illumination of the gender justice spaces currently being mobilised in Australian schools. Such spaces, it is argued, fostered within a context of increasing autonomy and self-management for schools, are providing avenues for creative and disruptive (pro)feminist activism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ailwood, J., & Lingard, B. (2001). The endgame for national girls’ education policies in Australia?Australian Journal of Education, 45(1), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alloway, N. (1995).Foundation stones: The construction of gender in early childhood. Carlton: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddulph, S. (1997).Raising boys. Sydney: Finch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (1999).Troubling women: Feminism, leadership and educational change. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C., Kenway, J., & McLeod, J. (2000a). Gender debates we still have to have.Australian Educational Researcher, 27(3), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C., Kenway, J., & McLeod, J. (2000b).Factors influencing the educational performances of males and females in school and their initial destinations after leaving school. Canberra: DETYA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Schools Commission. (1975).Girls, Schools and Society. Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Schools Commission. (1984).Girls and Tomorrow. Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Schools Commission. (1987).The National Policy on the Education of Girls in Australia. Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1995).Masculinities. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2000).The men and the boys. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cribb, A., & Gewirtz, S. (2003). Towards a sociology of just practices. In C. Vincent (Ed.),Social justice, education and identity. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Corporation for the Australian Education Council. (1993).National Action Plan for the Education of Girls 1993–97. Carlton: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daws, L. (1997). The quiet achiever. The National Policy for the Education of Girls. In: B. Lingard & P. Porter (Eds.),A national approach to schooling in Australia? pp. 95–110. Canberra: Australian College of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, M. (in press). A story about how a cluster of six schools implemented the Federal Government’s Success for Boys program.Redress.

  • Department of Education Science and Training. (2005).Success for boys. Retrieved August 21, 2008 from http://www.successforboys.edu.au/boys/

  • Eisenstein, H. (1996).Inside Agitators: Australian femocrats and the state. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, D., Elwood, J., Hey, V., & Maw, J. (Eds.). (1998).Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, V. (1994, November/December). “What about the boys?” Presumptive equality and the obfuscation of concerns about theory, research, policy, resources and curriculum in the education of girls and boys. Paper presented to theAARE Annual Conference, The University of Newcastle, NSW.

  • Francis, B., & Skelton, C. (2005).Reassessing gender and achievement: Questioning contemporary key debates. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B. (2000).Boys, girls and achievement: Addressing the classroom issues. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, F. (2003). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition and participation. In: N. Fraser & A. Honneth (Eds.),Redistribution or recognition? pp. 7–109. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, F. (2007). Feminist politics in the age of recognition: A two-dimensional approach to gender justice.Studies in Social Justice, 1(1), 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1997).Justice interruptus: critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell, J., & Taylor, S. (2003). The women’s movement in Canadian and Australian education: From liberation and sexism to boys and social justice.Gender and Education, 15(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, J., & Starr, K. (2000, November/December).Gender equity: A case for moving beyond his ‘n’ hers! Paper presented at the AARE Annual Conference, The University of Sydney.

  • Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (2000).Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform and equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. (1998). The displacement of girls as the “educationally disadvantaged” subject: A genealogical tale.Change, 1(2), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. (2003). Mapping transformations in educational subjectivities: Working within and against discourse.International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7(1), 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M., & Taylor, S. (1993). Gender equity and economic rationalism: An uneasy alliance. In B. Lingard, J. Knight, & P. Porter (Eds.),Schooling reform in hard times, pp. 153–175. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Training. (2002).Boys: Getting it right. Canberra: Commonwealth Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddie, A. (2005). A framework for gender justice: Evaluating the transformative capacities of three key Australian schooling initiatives.Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddie, A., & Mills, M. (2007).Teaching boys: Classroom practices that work. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J. (1990). Gender and education policy: A call for new directions. Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J. (1997). Taking stock of gender reform policies for Australian schools: Past, present and future.British Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 329–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J., Willis, S., Rennie, L., & Blackmore, J. (1998).Answering back. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1991).Feminist Research in Education. Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2003). Where to in gender policy in education after recuperative masculinity politics?International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7(1), 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2000). Federalism in schooling since the Karmel Report: From Modernist Hope to Postmodernist Performativity.Australian Educational Researcher, 27(2), 25–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (1998). Contextualising and utilising the “what about the boys?” backlash for gender equity goals.Change, 1(2), 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Knight, J., & Porter, P. (Eds.) (1993).Schooling reform in hard times. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Martino, W., Mills, M., & Bahr, M. (2002).Addressing the educational needs of boys. Canberra: Department of Education Science and Training (DEST).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2003). After the marketplace: Evidence, social science and educational research.Australian Educational Researcher, 30(2), 87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, W., Lingard, B., & Mills, M. (2004). Issues in boys’ education: A question of teacher threshold knowledges.Gender and Education, 16(4), 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martino, W., & Pallotta-Chiarolli, M. (2005).Being normal is the only way to be: Adolescent perspectives on gender and school. Sydney: UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCEETYA. (1997).Gender Equity: A Framework for Australian Schools. Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnes, S. (1996).Girls, Schools… and boys: Promoting gender equity through schools: Twenty years of gender equity policy development. Research paper 24. Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J., & Yates, L. (2006).Making modern lives: Subjectivity, schooling and social change. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M. (2003). Shaping the boys’ agenda: The backlash blockbusters.International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7(1), 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., Martino, W., & Lingard, B. (2007). Getting boys’ education “right”: The Australian Government’s Parliamentary Inquiry Report as an exemplary instance of recuperative masculinity politics.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Doherty, S. (1994).Report on Boys Education. NSW Government Advisory Committee.

  • O’Donovan, D. (2006). Moving away from “failing boys” and “passive girls”: Gender meta-narratives in gender equity policies for Australian schools and why micronarratives provide a better policy model.Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 27(4), 475–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozga, J. (2000).Policy research in educational settings contested terrain. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, W. (1999).Real boys: Rescuing our sons from the myths of boyhood. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey, M. (1991).Economic Rationalism in Canberra. A Nation Building State Changes its Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. (2000).Marked men: White masculinity in crisis. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, R., & Broombill, R. (1988).“Short-changed”: Women and economic policies Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. (2003). Discourses of difference in gender equity policy in Australian education: feminism and marginalisation.Melbourne Studies of Education, 44(2), 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Henry, M. (2000). Challenges for equity policy in changing contexts.Australian Educational Researcher, 27(3), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teese, R., Davies, M., Charlton, R., & Polesel, J. (1995).Who wins at school? Canberra, AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P. (2002).Schooling the rust-belt kids. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, L. (1993).The education of girls: Policy, research and the question of gender. Camberwell, Victoria: The Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, L. (1997). Gender equity and the boys debate: What sort of challenge is it?British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(3), 337–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, L. (1998). Constructing and deconstructing "girls" as a category of concern. In A. Mackinnon, I. Elgquvist-Saltzman, & A. Prentice (Eds.),Education into the 21st Century: Dangerous terrain for women? London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver-Hightower, M. (2003). The “boy turn” in research on gender and education.Review of Educational Research, 73(4), 471–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keddie, A. National gender equity and schooling policy in Australia: Struggles for a non-identitarian feminist politics. Aust. Educ. Res. 36, 21–37 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216897

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216897

Keywords

Navigation