“I am smart and I am not joking”: Aiming high in the middle years of schooling

Abstract

In this paper, we draw on accounts from students to inform a Middle Schooling movement that has been variously described as “arrested”, “unfinished” and “exhausted”. We propose that if the Middle Schooling movement is to understand the changing worlds of students and develop new approaches in the middle years of schooling, then it is important to draw on the insights that individual students can provide by conducting research with “students-as-informants”. The early adolescent informants to this paper report high hopes for their futures (despite their lower socioeconomic surroundings), which reinforces the importance of supporting successful learner identities and highlights the role of schooling in the decline of adolescent student aspirations. However, their insights did not stop at the individual learner, with students also identifying cultural and structural constraints to reform. As such, we argue that students may be both an important resource for inquiry into individual school reform and for the Middle Schooling movement internationally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams, P. (2006). Positioning behaviour: Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the post-welfare era.International Journal of Inclusive Education, 10, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anafara, V. A., Jr. (Ed.). (2001).The handbook of research in middle level education. Greenwich, USA: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arhar, J. M. (2005). Action research for middle level education professionals. In M. Caskey (Ed.),Making a difference: Action research in middle level education. Greenwich, USA: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2005).Schools Australia (Catalogue Number 4221.0). Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barratt, R. (1998).Shaping middle schooling in Australia: A report of the National Middle Schooling Project. Deakin West: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beane, J. (1991). The middle school: Natural home of integrated curriculum.Educational Leadership, 49(2), 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beane, J. A. (1995). Curriculum integrations and the disciplines of knowledge.Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 616–22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beane, J. A. (1996). On the shoulders of giants! The case for curriculum integration.Middle School Journal, 28, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beane, J. A. (2001). Introduction. In T. S. Dickinson (Ed.),Reinventing the middle school (pp. xiii-xxi). New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boomer, G., Lester, N., Onore, C., & Cook, J. (Eds.). (1992).Negotiating the curriculum: Educating for the 21st century. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bourdieu, P. (1984).Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Braggett, E. (1997).The middle years of schooling: An Australian perspective. NSW: Hawker Brownlow Education.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brennan, M., & Sachs, J. (1998).Integrated curriculum: Classroom materials or the middle years. Deakin West: Australian Curriculum Studies Association/National Schools Network.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carnegie Group. (1989).Turning points. Boston: Center for Collaborative Education.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carrington, V. (2006).Rethinking the middle years: Early adolescents, schooling and digital culture. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Centre for Labour Research. (2002).Living and learning: A profile of young people, employment, education and training in northern Adelaide. Adelaide: University of Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chadbourne, R. (2001).Middle schooling for the middle years: What might the jury be considering? Southbank: Australian Education Union.

    Google Scholar 

  18. City of Playford. (2006).City of Playford wellbeing plan (2006–2011). Adelaide: City of Playford.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (2005).Turn-around pedagogies: Literacy interventions for at-risk students. Newtown: Primary English Teaching Association.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Comber, B., & Nixon, H. (2006, November).Teacher identity and pedagogical change. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, Adelaide, Australia.

  21. Cormack, P. (1996). Constructions of the adolescent in newspapers and policy documents: Implications for middle schooling.South Australian Educational Leader, 7(6), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cormack, P. (1998). Classroom discourse in the upper primary and early secondary years.Queensland Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cormack, P., Johnson, B., Peters, J., & Williams, D. (1998). About authentic assessment. In P. Cormack (Ed.),Authentic assessment: A report on classroom research and practice in the middle. Deakin West: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cuban, L. (1992). What happens to reforms that last? The case of the junior high school.American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 227–251.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cumming, J. (1996).Extending reform in the middle years of schooling: Challenges and responses. Deakin West: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Daniels, H., Bizar, M., & Zemelman, S. (2001).Rethinking high school: Best practice in teaching, learning and leadership. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dimitriadias, G., & Weis, L. (2001). Imagining possibilities with and for contemporary youth: (Re)writing and (re)visioning education today.Qualitative Research, 1(2), 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dickinson, T. S. (2001).Reinventing the middle school. New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dolby, N. (2003). Popular culture and democratic practice.Harvard Educational Review, 73(3), 258–284.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Duncan-Andrade, J. (2004). Your best friend or your worst enemy: Popular culture, pedagogy and curriculum in urban classrooms.Review of Education Pedagogy & Cultural Studies, 26(4), 313–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Earl, L. M. (1999).Education for the middle years: The paradox of hope. Jolimont. Vic: IARTV.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Elliott, M., Sandeman, P., & Winchester, H. (2005, July).Embedding community engagement: Northern Adelaide and the University of South Australia. Paper presented at the 4th Australian University Quality Forum, Sydney.

  33. Eyers, V., Cormack, P., & Barratt, R. (1993).The education of young adolescents in South Australian government schools: Report of the Junior Secondary Review. Adelaide: Education Department of South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  34. George, P. S., Stevenson, C., Thomason, J., & Beane, J. (1992).The middle school — and beyond. Virginia USA: Association for Supervision of Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gonzalez, N., & Moll, L. (2002). Cruzando el Puente: Building bridges to funds of knowledge.Educational Policy, 16(4), 623–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Goodson, I. (1995). The story so far: Personal knowledge and the political.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Green, B., & Bigum, C. (1993). Aliens in the classroom.Australian Journal of Education, 37, 119–141.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Groundwater-Smith, S., Mitchell, J., & Mockler, N. (2007).Learning in the middle years: More than a transition. South Melbourne: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Grunewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place.Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Harradine, J. (1996). What research tells us about school reform.National Schools Network Newsletter, 2, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hattam, R. (2006, November).Easier said than done: “Strong connectedness” in the middle years. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, Adelaide, Australia.

  42. Hattam, R., & Smyth, J. (2003). Not everyone has a perfect life: Becoming somebody without school.Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 11, 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P., & Lingard, B. (2006).Teachers & schooling making a difference: Productive pedagogies, assessment and performance. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hill, P. W., & Russell, V. J. (1999). Systemic whole school reform of the middle years of schooling. In R. Bosker, P. Creemers, & S. Stringfield (Eds.),Enhancing Educational Excellence, Equity and Efficiency (pp. 167–196). Dordrecht: Klewer Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  45. lisahunter. (2007). Editorial: Machination in the middle.Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jackson, A. W., & Davis, G. A. (2000).Turning points 2000: Educating adolescents in the 21st century. New York: Teachers’ College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2003). Planning pedagogy for i-mode: From flogging to blogging via wi-fi.English in Australia — Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 139, 78–102.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lamb, S., & Teese, R. (2006).Equity programs for government schools in NSW: A Review. Melbourne: Centre for Post-compulsory Education and Lifelong Learning, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lingard, B. (2006). Series editor’s foreword. In B. Lingard (Ed.),Rethinking the middle years: Early adolescents, schooling and digital culture. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lingard, B. (2007). Pedagogies of indifference.International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 245–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lingard, B., Ladwig, J., Luke, A., Mills, M., Hayes, D., & Gore, J. (2001).Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study: Final report. Brisbane: Education Department.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lingard, B., & Mills, M. (2007). Pedagogies making a difference: Issues of social justice and inclusion.International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Luke, A., Elkins, J., Weir, K., Land, R., Carrington, V., Sole, S. et al. (2003).Beyond the middle: A report about literacy and numeracy development of target group students in the middle years of schooling. Nathan: Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training, Griffith University.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Main, K., & Bryer, F. (2007). A framework for research into Australian middle school practice.Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Marks, G. N., & Fleming N. (1999).Early school leaving in Australia: Findings from the 1995 Year 9 cohort. Camberwell, Vic: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Megalogenis, G. (2006).The longest decade. Carlton North: Scribe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms.Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Office of Employment. (2003).Regional profile: Northern Adelaide statistical subdivision. Adelaide: Department of Further Education, Employment, Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Peel, M. (1995). Good times, hard times: The past and the future in Elizabeth. Carlton: Melbourne Uni Press.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Powell, R. (2001). Middle school curriculum. In Anafara, V. A., Jr. (Ed.),The handbook of research in middle level education (pp. 107–124). Greenwich, USA: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Prosser, B. (2006).ADHD: Who’s failing who? Lane Cove: Finch.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Prosser, B. (2008a). Beyond ADHD: A consideration of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and pedagogy in Australian schools.International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12 (1), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Prosser, B. (2008b). Critical pedagogy and the mythopoetic: A case study from Adelaide’s northern urban fringe. In T. Leonard, & P. Willis (Eds.),Pedagogies of the Imagination. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Reid, A. (2004).Toward a culture of inquiry in DECS. Occasional paper series, no. 1. Retrieved October 10, 2007, from the Government of South Australia Web site: http://www.decs.sa.gov.au/corporate/files/links/OP_01.pdf

  65. Roche, M. (1987). Social theory and the lifeworld.British Journal of Sociology, 38, 283–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sapon-Shevin, M. (2005). Afterword. In E. Brown, & K. Saltman (Eds.),The critical middle school reader (pp. 521–523). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Sellar, S., & Cormack, P. (2007, May).Redesigning pedagogies in the middle years: Challenges for teachers working with disadvantaged students. Paper presented at the Redesigning Pedagogy: Culture, Knowledge and Understanding Conference, Singapore.

  68. Slee, R. (1994). Finding a student voice in school reform: Student disaffection, pathologies of disruption and educational control.International Studies in the Sociology of Education, 4, 147–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Smith, G. (2002). Place-based education: Learning to be where we are.Phi Delta Kappan, 83(8), 584–594.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Smyth, J. (2001).Critical politics of teachers’ work. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Smyth, J., Dow, A., Hattam, R., Reid, A., & Shacklock, G. (2000).Teachers’ work in a globalizing economy. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Smyth, J., & McInerney, P. (2007).Teachers in the middle: Reclaiming the wasteland of the adolescent years of schooling. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Smyth, J., McInerney, P., & Hattam, R. (2003). Tackling school leaving at its source: A case of reform in the middle years of schooling.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(2), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Stevens, L. P., lisahunter, Pendergast, D., Carrington, V., Bahr, N., Kapitzke, C., et al. (2007). Reconceptualizing the possible narratives of adolescence.Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Teese, R. (2006, March 23). Learning labs.The Australian Financial Review.

  76. Thomson, P. (2002).Schooling the rustbelt kids: Making the difference in changing Times. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Wallace, J., Sheffield, R., Rennie, L., & Venville, G. (2007). Looking back, looking forward: Re-searching the conditions for curriculum integration in the middle years of schooling.Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prosser, B., McCallum, F., Milroy, P. et al. “I am smart and I am not joking”: Aiming high in the middle years of schooling. Aust. Educ. Res. 35, 15–35 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216881

Download citation

Keywords

  • Middle School
  • Urban Fringe
  • Teacher Research
  • Learner Identity
  • Deficit View