Advertisement

The Australian Educational Researcher

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 89–109 | Cite as

The impact of the GATS on transnational tertiary education: Comparing experiences of New Zealand, Australia, Singapore and Malaysia

  • Christopher Ziguras
Article

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) on transnational higher education in four countries: New Zealand, Australia, Singapore and Malaysia. The GATS is a multilateral agreement through which WTO members commit to voluntary liberalisation of trade in services, including education. Transnational (or offshore) education refers to education that is delivered by an institution based in one country to students located in a different country. Two of the countries considered, New Zealand and Australia, have made commitments under GATS to allow relatively unrestricted cross-border provision of education in their countries, while the other two countries, Singapore and Malaysia, have made no such commitment. There is currently considerable activity in renegotiating countries’ commitments to GATS as part of the Doha round of WTO negotiations, and simultaneously bilateral free trade agreements are being proposed between countries in the region. In this context, this paper examines the practical impact that GATS has had on these two countries that have made commitments regarding education, and the likely impact that similar commitments by Malaysia and Singapore would have on the tertiary education systems in those major importing countries.

Keywords

World Trade Organization Tertiary Education National Treatment Private High Education World Trade Organization Member 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (2001) Higher education and the WTO: globalization run amok,International Higher Education, no. 23, pp 2–4.Google Scholar
  2. APEC (2001)Measures Affecting Trade and Investment in Education Services in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Report to the APEC Group on Services, Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (Organization), Singapore.Google Scholar
  3. Barlow, M. and H.-J. Robertson (1996) Homogenization of education, in J. Mander and E. Goldsmith, eds.,The Case Against the Global Economy and for a Turn Toward the Local, Sierra Club Books, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  4. Branson, L. (2001) Singapore tops in globalisation,The Straits Times, 10 January, p. 1.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, D. (1998) Globalization, ethnicity and the nation-state: the case of Singapore,Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr, K. (1999) Mental health: Greenwich University,Senate Hansard, 12 May, p. 4847.Google Scholar
  7. Challenger Concept (2000)Education Guide Malaysia, 6th ed., Challenger Concept, Petaling Jaya.Google Scholar
  8. DETYA (2000a)Higher Education Report for the 2000 to 2002 Triennium, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra.Google Scholar
  9. DETYA (2000b)National Protocols for Higher Education Approval Processes, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra.Google Scholar
  10. DFAT (1997)Closer Economic Relations: Background Guide to the Australia-New Zealand Economic Relationship, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Canberra.Google Scholar
  11. DFAT (2001)The General Agreement on Trade and Services, Commonwealth Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, viewed 23 August 2002, 〈http://www.dfat.gov.au/trade/negotiations/gats_factsheet.html〉Google Scholar
  12. Drew, J. (1999) Private higher education: threat or a promise?Association of Commonwealth Universities Bulletin, no. 137, online, viewed 29 October 2003, 〈http://www.acu.ac.uk/yearbook/137-private.html〉Google Scholar
  13. Education (2000) Profile of an educationist: Dr Thomas Khoo,Education: Singapore’s Knowledge Industry Journal, June/July, p. 21.Google Scholar
  14. Education International and Public Services International (2000)The WTO and the Millennium Round: What is at Stake for Public Education, Education International, Brussels.Google Scholar
  15. Education Quarterly (2000) Didn’t get into local varsity?Education Quarterly, pp. 72-7.Google Scholar
  16. Education Quarterly (2001) World class: international students in Malaysia,Education Quarterly, no. 14, pp. 6–15.Google Scholar
  17. Gallagher, M. (2000)Corporate Universities, Higher Education and the Future: Emerging Policy Issues, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, viewed 14 May 2001, 〈http://www.detya.gov.au/highered/otherpub/corp_uni.htm〉Google Scholar
  18. GATE (1999)Trade in Transnational Education Services, Global Alliance for Transnational Education, Washington.Google Scholar
  19. Ismail, R. (1997) The role of the private sector in Malaysian education, in Z. Marshallsay, ed.,Educational Challenges in Malaysia: Advances and Prospects, Monash Asia Institute, Clayton.Google Scholar
  20. Johari, B. M. (2000) Higher education planning in Malaysia,Education Quarterly, no. 11, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
  21. Kandasamy, M. and R. Santhiram (2000) From national interest to globalization: the educational system of Malaysia, in K. Mazurek, M. A. Winzer and C. Majorek, eds.,Education in a Global Society: A Comparative Perspective, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
  22. Kelsey, J. (1997) The globalisation of tertiary education: implications of GATS, in M. Peters, ed.,Cultural Politics and the University, Dunmore Press, Palmerston North.Google Scholar
  23. Kelsey, J (1999)10 Reasons Why the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) is Bad for Public Education, Association of University Staff of New Zealand, viewed 17 April 2001, 〈http://aus.ac.nz/〉.Google Scholar
  24. Kelsey, J (2000) Free trade Trojan horse,Advocate: Journal of the National Tertiary Education Union, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 5.Google Scholar
  25. Lee, M. N. (1999)Private Higher Education in Malaysia, University Sains Malaysia School of Educational Studies, Penang.Google Scholar
  26. Lew, B. (2000) Private higher education: backwards and forwards,Education Quarterly, pp. 62-70.Google Scholar
  27. Malaysia (1991)The Way Forward: Vision 2020, Prime Minister’s Office, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  28. Malaysian Ministry of Education (1993)Educational Statistics of Malaysia, Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  29. Malaysian Ministry of Education (1997)Private Higher Educational Institutions (Conducting Courses of Study) Regulations, Jabatan Pendidikan Swasta, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  30. McBurnie, G. and C. Ziguras (2001) The regulation of transnational higher education in Southeast Asia: case studies of Hong Kong, Malaysia and Australia,Higher Education, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McNutty, S. (2000) Singapore aims to be centre of advanced academic excellence,Financial Times, 23 August, p. 4.Google Scholar
  32. Neville, W. (1998) Restructuring tertiary education in Malaysia: the nature and implications of policy,Higher Education Policy, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 257–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. New Zealand (2001)Agreement Between New Zealand and Singapore on a Closer Economic Partnership, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Wellington.Google Scholar
  34. New Zealand Ministry of Education (2000)New Zealand’s Tertiary Education Sector Profile and Trends 1999, Ministry of Education, New Zealand, Wellington.Google Scholar
  35. NTEU (2000) What is happening on 11–13 September 2000?Nexus Update: Newsletter of the National Tertiary Education Union Victorian Division, 1 September, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
  36. NTEU (2001)The General Agreement on Trade in Services: Implications for the Domestic Regulation of Higher Education and Professional Accreditation, National Tertiary Education Union, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  37. NZAPEP (2000)A Submission to TEAC on the Shape of the Sector, November 2000, New Zealand Association of Private Education Providers, viewed 20 April 2001, 〈http://www.teac.govt.nz/submissions/140.pdf〉Google Scholar
  38. OECD (2002)Current Commitments under the GATS in Educational Services: Background Document Prepared for the OECD/US Forum on Trade in Educational Services, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.Google Scholar
  39. Patton, M. A. (1999) Changes in the Singapore university student demand since the currency crash,Higher Education in Europe, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 203–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Riley, N. (2000) Chicago Graduate School of Business,Education: Singapore’s Knowledge Industry Journal, pp. 34–6.Google Scholar
  41. Rudner, M. (1997) International trade in higher education services in the Asia Pacific Region: the ASEAN experience and the role of APEC,World Competition: Law and Economics Review, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 87–115.Google Scholar
  42. Scott, W. G. and H. M. Scott (2000)New Zealand University Funding Over the Last Two Decades, Working Paper Series 2/2000, Massey University College of Business and Association of University Staff of New Zealand, Wellington.Google Scholar
  43. Silverman, G. (1996) Silence of the lambs,Far Eastern Economic Review, 14 November, pp. 24–6.Google Scholar
  44. Singapore Department of Statistics (2000) Educational upgrading through external degree programmes, 1998,Statistics Singapore Newsletter, January, pp. 17–18. Singapore Department of Statistics (2001)Google Scholar
  45. Educational upgrading through external degree programmes, 1999,Statistics Singapore Newsletter, January, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
  46. Singapore Management University (2000)Background Information, Singapore Management University, Singapore.Google Scholar
  47. Singapore Ministry of Education (1998)Education in Singapore: An Overview, Ministry of Education, Singapore.Google Scholar
  48. Singapore Ministry of Education (2000a)Education Statistics Digest, Management Information Branch, Planning Division, Singapore.Google Scholar
  49. Singapore Ministry of Education (2000b)Information Notes: Registration of Distance Learning Programmes, Private Schools Section, Ministry of Education, Singapore.Google Scholar
  50. Singapore Ministry of Education (2001),Private Schools in Singapore, Singapore Ministry of Education, viewed 27 May 2001, 〈http://www1.moe.edu.sg/privatesch/privates.htm〉Google Scholar
  51. Snape, R. (1998) Reaching effective agreements covering services, in A. Krueger, ed.,The WTO as an International Organization, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
  52. TEAC (2001)Shaping the System, New Zealand Tertiary Education Advisory Commission, Wellington.Google Scholar
  53. UCGSB (2001) University of Chicago Graduate School of Business website, viewed 6 February 2001, 〈http://gsb.uchicago.edu〉Google Scholar
  54. UNESCO and Council of Europe (2000)Code of Good Practice in the Provision of Transnational Education, UNESCO-CEPES, Bucharest.Google Scholar
  55. United States International Trade Commission (1997)General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS): Examination of Asia/Pacific Trading Partners’ Schedules of Commitments, United States International Trade Commission, Washington.Google Scholar
  56. Victorian Department of Education and Training (2002)Application for Registration, Quality Assurance and Review Division, Office of Training and Tertiary Education, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  57. Wee, C. J. W. L. (1999) ‘Asian values’, Singapore, and the Third Way: re-working individualism and collectivism,Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 332–58.Google Scholar
  58. World Economic Forum (1996)Global Competitiveness Report, World Economic Forum, Geneva.Google Scholar
  59. WTO (1995)General Agreement on Trade in Services, World Trade Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  60. WTO (1998)Communication from the United States: Education Services, World Trade Organization Council for Trade in Services, Geneva.Google Scholar
  61. WTO (2000)Communication from the United States: Higher (Tertiary) Education, Adult Education and Training, World Trade Organization Council for Trade in Services, Geneva.Google Scholar
  62. WTO (2001a)Communication from Australia: Negotiating Proposal for Education Services (S/CSS/W/110), World Trade Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  63. WTO (2001b)Communication from New Zealand: Negotiating Proposal for Education Services (S/CSS/W/93), World Trade Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  64. Yim, S. H. and S. L. Yeo (1999) Educational upgrading through external degree programmes,Statistics Singapore Newsletter, no. 8, pp. 8–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Association for Research in Education 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Ziguras
    • 1
  1. 1.RMIT Globalism InstituteAustralia

Personalised recommendations