, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 1013–1034 | Cite as

Standardization of pathways to adulthood? an analysis of Dutch cohorts born between 1850 and 1900

  • Hilde BrasEmail author
  • Aart C. Liefbroer
  • Cees H. Elzinga


This article examines pathways to adulthood among Dutch cohorts born in the second half of the nineteenth century. Although largely overlooked by previous studies, theory suggests that life courses of young adults born during this period were already influenced by a process of standardization, in the sense that their life courses became more similar over time. Using data from a Dutch registry-based sample, we examine household trajectories: that is, sequences of living arrangements of young adults aged 15–40. Our study shows that for successive cohorts, household trajectories became more similar. We identified six types of trajectories: early death, life-cycle service, early family formation, late family formation, singlehood, and childless but with partner. Overtime, early family formation gradually became the “standard” trajectory to adulthood. However, late family formation and singlehood, tcommon pathways within the preindustrial western European marriage pattern, remained widespread among cohorts born in the late nineteenth century. Laboring class youths, farmers’ daughters, young people of mixed religious background, and urban-born youngsters were the nineteenth century forerunners of a standard pathway to adulthood.


Nineteenth Century Birth Cohort Living Arrangement Unskilled Laborer Parental Home 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbott, A. and J. Forrest. 1986. “Optimal Matching Methods for Historical Sequences.”Journal of Interdisciplinary History 16: 471–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott, A. and A. Tsay. 2000. “Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Methods in Sociology.”Sociological Methods & Research 29(1): 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arosio, L. 2004. “Occupational Careers and Longitudinal Data: Tools and Perspectives of Research.”Quality & Quantity 38: 435–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aassve, A., F. Billari, and R. Piccarreta. 2007. “Strings of Adulthood: A Sequence Analysis of Young British Women’s Work-Family Trajectories.”European Journal of Population 23: 369–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baizán, P., F. Michelin, and F.C. Billari. 2002. “Political Economy and Life Course Patterns: The Heterogeneity of Occupational, Family and Household Trajectories of Young Spaniards.”Demographic Research, Vol. 6, article 8: 191–240. Available online at http://www.demographic-research. org/volumes/vol6/8/6-8.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, U. 1992. “Individualization, Institutionalization and Standardization: Life Situations and Biographical Patterns.” Pp. 127–38 inRisk Society. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Billari, F.C. 2001. “The Analysis of Early Life Courses: Complex Descriptions of the Transition to Adulthood.”Journal of Population Research 18: 119–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bras, H. 2004. “Social Change, the Institution of Service and Youth: The Case of Service in the Lives of Rural-Born Dutch Women, 1840–1940.”Continuity and Change 19: 241–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brinkgreve, C. and A. De Regt. 1991. “Adolescentie als opgave. Ontwikkelingen in een levensfase 1750–1990” [Adolescence as issue. Developments in a life phase 1750–1990]. Pp. 15–35 inHet is meisjes menens. Inleiding meisjesstudies, edited by I. Van der Zanden. Amersfoort/Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
  10. Brückner, J. and K.U. Mayer. 2005. “De-Standardization of the Life Course: What Might It Mean? And If It Means Anything, Whether It Actually Took Place.” Pp. 27–53 inThe Structure of the Life Course: Standardized? Individualized? Differentiated?, edited by R. Macmillan. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  11. Brüderl, J. and S. Scherer. 2005. “Methoden zur Analyse von Sequenzdaten” [Methods of analysis of sequence data].Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 44: 330–47.Google Scholar
  12. Buchmann, M. 1989.The Script of Life in Modern Society. Entry Into Adulthood in a Changing World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, S., B. Ma, and K. Zhang. 2009. “On the Similarity Metric and the Distance Metric.”Theoretical Computer Science 410: 2365–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coale, A.J. and S.C. Watkins, eds. 1986.The Decline of Fertility in Europe: The Revised Proceedings of a Conference on the Princeton European Fertility Project. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Derosas, R. and F. Van Poppel, eds. 2006.Religion and the Decline of Fertility in the Western World. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Duda, R.O., P.R. Hart, and D.G. Stork. 2001.Pattern Classification. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Elder, G.H. 1978. “Family History and the Life Course.” Pp. 17–64 inTransitions. The Family and the Life Course in Historical Perspective, edited by T.K. Hareven. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. —. 1985.Life Course Dynamics: Trajectories and Transitions, 1968–1980. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Elder, G.H., M.K. Johnson, and R. Crosnoe. 2003. “The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory.” Pp. 3–19 inHandbook of the Life Course, edited by J.T. Mortimer and M. Shanahan. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elzinga, C.H. 2003. “Sequence Similarity—A Non-Aligning Technique.”Sociological Methods & Research 31: 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. —. 2005. “Combinatorial Representation of Token Sequences.”Journal of Classification 21(1): 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. —. 2008. “CHESA User’s Guide.” Department of Social Science Research Methods, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Available online at Scholar
  23. Elzinga, C.H. and A.C. Liefbroer. 2007. “De-Standardization of Family-Life Trajectories of Young Adults: A Cross-National Comparison Using Sequence Analysis.”European Journal of Population 23: 225–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elzinga, C.H., S. Rahmann, and H. Wang. 2008. “Algorithms for Subsequence Combinatorics.”Theoretical Computer Science 409: 394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Engelen, T. and J. Kok. 2003. “Permanent Celibacy and Late Marriage in the Netherlands, 1890–1960.”Population 58(1): 67–96.Google Scholar
  26. Falkenburg, P. 1905.De huwelijkskansen der vrouwen in Nederland [The marriage chances of women in the Netherlands]. Haarlem: Bohn.Google Scholar
  27. Gabadinho, A., G. Ritschard, M. Studer, and N.S. Müller. 2008. “Mining Sequence Data in R With the TraMineR Package: A User’s Guide.” Department of Econometrics and Laboratory of Demography, University of Geneva, Switzerland. Available online at Scholar
  28. Gillis, J.R. 1974.Youth and History. Tradition and Change in European Age Relations 1770—Present. New York/London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hajnal, J. 1965. “European Marriage Patterns in Perspective.” Pp. 101–43 inPopulation in History. Essays in Historical Demography, edited by D.V. Glass and D.E.C. Eversley. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  30. —. 1983. “Two Kinds of Preindustrial Household Formation Systems.” Pp. 65–104 inFamily Forms in Historic Europe, edited by R. Wall, J. Robin, and P. Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hanawalt, B.A. 1992. “Historical Descriptions and Prescriptions for Adolescence.”Journal of Family History 17: 341–51.Google Scholar
  32. Hareven, T.K. 1986. “Historical Change in the Social Construction of the Life Course.”Human Development 29: 171–80.Google Scholar
  33. Hartigan, J.A. 1975.Clustering Algorithms. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Hofstee, E.W. 1981.Korte demografische geschiedenis van Nederland van 1800 tot heden [Short demographic history of the Netherlands since 1800]. Bussum: Unieboek.Google Scholar
  35. Hogan, D.P. 1978. “The Variable Order of Events in the Life Course.”American Sociological Review 43: 573–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. —. 1981.Transitions and Social Change. The Early Lives of American Men. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hynes, K. and M. Clarkberg. 2005. “Women’s Employment Patterns During Early Parenthood: A Group-Based Trajectory Analysis.”Journal of Marriage and Family 2005: 222–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jackson, P.B. and A. Berkowitz. 2005. “The Structure of the Life Course: Gender and Racioethnic Variation in the Occurrence and Sequencing of Role Transitions.” Pp. 55–90 inThe Structure of the Life Course: Standardized? Individualized? Differentiated?, edited by R. Macmillan. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  39. Knippenberg, H. and B. De Pater. 1988.De eenwording van Nederland. Schaalvergroting en integratie sinds 1800. [The unification of the Netherlands. Scaling and integration since 1800]. Nijmegen: SUN.Google Scholar
  40. Kohli, M. 1986. “The World We Forgot: A Historical Review of the Life Course.” Pp. 271–303 inLater Life: The Social Psychology of Ageing, edited by V.W. Marshall. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Macmillan, R. 2005. “The Structure of the Life Course: Classic Issues and Current Controversies.” Pp. 3–24 inThe Structure of the Life Course: Standardized? Individualized? Differentiated?, edited by R. Macmillan. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  42. Mandemakers, K. 1996.HBS en Gymnasium. Ontwikkeling, structuur, sociale achtergrond en school-prestaties, Nederland, circa 1800–1968 [Secondary education. Development, structure, social background, and school performance, the Netherlands, circa 1800–1968]. Amsterdam: Stichting IISG Beheer.Google Scholar
  43. —. 2006. “Building Life Course Data Sets From Population Registers by the Historical Sample of the Netherlands (HSN).”History and Computing 14(1–2): 87–101.Google Scholar
  44. Marini, M.M. 1984. “The Order of Events in the Transition to Adulthood.”Sociology of Education 57: 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martin, P., I. Schoon, and A. Ross. 2008. “Beyond Transitions: Applying Optimal Matching Analysis to Life Course Research.”International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11: 179–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mayer, K.-U. 1986. “Structural Constraints on the Life Course.”Human Development 29: 163–70.Google Scholar
  47. —. 2004. “Whose Lives? How History, Society and Institutions Define and Shape Life Courses.”Research in Human Development 1: 161–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Modell, J. 1989.Into One’s Own. From Youth to Adulthood in the United States 1920–1975. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  49. Modell, J., F.F. Furstenberg, and T. Hershberg. 1976. “Social Change and Transitions to Adulthood in Historical Perspective.”Journal of Family History 1: 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mouw, T. 2005. “Sequences of Early Adult Transitions: A Look at Variability and Consequences.” Pp. 256–91 inOn the Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research and Public Policy, edited by R.A. Settersten, F.F. Furstenberg, and R.G. Rumbaut. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Pollock, G. 2007. “Holistic Trajectories: A Study of Combined Employment, Housing and Family Careers by Using Multiple-Sequence Analysis.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 170: 167–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reher, D.S. 1998. “Family Ties in Western Europe: Persistent Contrasts.”Population and Development Review 24: 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rindfuss, R.R., C.G. Swicegood, and R.A. Rosenfeld. 1987. “Disorder in the Life Course: How Common and Does it Matter?”American Sociological Review 52: 785–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Settersten, R.A., F.F. Furstenberg, and R.G. Rumbaut, eds. 2005.On the Frontier of Adulthood. Theory, Research, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Settersten, R.A. and K.-U. Mayer. 1997. “The Measurement of Age, Age Structuring, and the Life Course.”Annual Review of Sociology 23: 233–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stanger-Ross, J., C. Collins, and M.J. Stern. 2005. “Falling Far From the Tree. Transitions to Adulthood and the Social History of Twentieth-Century America.”Social Science History 29: 625–48.Google Scholar
  57. Stevens, D.A. 1990. “New Evidence on the Timing of Early Life Course Transitions: The United States 1900 to 1980.”Journal of Family History 15: 163–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Uhlenberg, P.R. 1969. “A Study of Cohort Life Cycles: Cohorts of Native Born Massachusetts Women, 1830–1920.”Population Studies 23: 407–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. —. 1974. “Cohort Variations in Family Life Cycle Experiences of U.S. Females.”Journal of Marriage and the Family 36: 284–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Van Bavel, J. and J. Kok. 2005. “The Role of Religion in the Dutch Fertility Transition: Starting, Spacing and Stopping in the Heart of the Netherlands, 1845–1945.”Continuity and Change 20: 247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van der Valk, L. 1986.Van pauperzorg tot bestaanszekerheid: een onderzoek naar de ontwikkeling van de armenzorg in Nederland tegen de achtergrond van de overgang naar de algemene Bijstandswet, 1912–1965 [From pauper care until secure livelihood: A study of the development of poor relief in the Netherlands against the background of the transition to the General Social Security Law, 1912–1965]. Amsterdam: Stichting IISG Beheer.Google Scholar
  62. Van der Woud, A. 2007.Een nieuwe wereld. Het ontstaan van het moderne Nederland [A new world. The beginning of a modern Netherlands]. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
  63. Van Leeuwen, M.H.D. and I. Maas 2005. “A Short Note on HISCLASS.” History of Work Information System. International Institute of Social History, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Available online at Scholar
  64. Van Leeuwen, M.H.D., I. Maas, and A. Miles 2002.HISCO. Historical International Standard Classification of Occupations. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Van Poppel, F. 1992.Trouwen in Nederland. Een historisch-demografische studie van de 19e en vroeg-20e eeuw [Marriage in the Netherlands. A historical-demographic study of the 19th and early 20th century]. The Hague: Stichting NIDI.Google Scholar
  66. —. 1999.De “statistieke ontleding van de dooden”: een spraakzame bron? [The “statistical dissection of the dead”: A communicative source?]. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Van Poppel, F., M. Oris, and J. Lee, eds. 2004.The Road to Independence: Leaving Home in Western and Eastern Societies, 16th–20th Centuries. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  68. Van Zanden, J.L. and A. Van Riel. 2004.The Strictures of Inheritance: The Dutch Economy in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Wall, R. 1989. “Leaving Home and Living Alone: An Historical Perspective.”Population Studies 43: 369–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. —. 1995. “Historical Development of the Household in Europe.” Pp 19–52 inHousehold Demography and Household Modeling, edited by E. van Imhoff, A. Kuijsten, P. Hooimeijer, and L. van Wissen. London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  71. Wintle, M. 2000.An Economic and Social History of the Netherlands, 1800–1920. Demographic, Economic and Social Transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wu, L.L. 2000. “Some Comments on Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Methods in Sociology: Review and Prospect.”Sociological Methods & Research 29: 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hilde Bras
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aart C. Liefbroer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cees H. Elzinga
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social Research MethodologyVU University AmsterdamHV Amsterdamthe Netherlands
  2. 2.Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic InstituteThe Hague

Personalised recommendations