Skip to main content
Log in

Die Bedeutung institutionalistischer Ansätze für das Verständnis von Organisations- und Managementprozessen in multinationalen Unternehmen

  • Published:
Berliner Journal für Soziologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Es ist auffällig, dass sich die sozialwissenschaftlich orientierte Organisationsforschung nur sehr wenig und theoretisch recht einseitig mit Multinationalen Unternehmen (MNU) als Organisationen beschäftigt. Organisationstheoretische Erklärungsmodelle, die das Verhalten in und von Organisationen jenseits technischer und ökonomischer Unternehmensumwelten erklären, sind daher eher rar und erst seit kurzem in einschlägigen Forschungsarbeiten zu finden. Ziel dieses Beitrages ist, die jüngere und vorwiegend englischsprachige Diskussion über den Einfluss von Institutionen und unterschiedlichen lokalen Rationalitäten auf Organisations- und Managementprozesse in MNU aufzuarbeiten. Im Folgenden werden die Grundlagen, wesentlichen Ansätze, Kernaussagen und Konsequenzen des europäischen und amerikanischen Institutionalismus dargestellt. Insbesondere wird der Beitrag die Bedeutung, aber auch Grenzen dieser beiden Ansätze für die Analyse von Veränderungsprozessen in Multinationalen Unternehmen skizzieren und evaluieren. Im Vergleich zum noch dominanten „evolutionären Paradigma“ in der internationalen Managementforschung wird hier das alternative Erklärungspotenzial von sozialwissenschaftlichen Institutionentheorien herausgestellt und anhand von vier verschiedenen Aspekten diskutiert: dem Einfluss des Heimatlandes, der Macht und der Autonomie von Tochtergesellschaften sowie der Entstehung transnationaler sozialer Räume.

Summary

This paper provides an overview over one of the most recent debates in international management by discussing key assumptions, major approaches, main contributions and implications of European and American institutionalist theories. In particular, the article discusses and evaluates the consequences of these approaches for the theory of the multinational firm. The potential of these approaches is explored by highlighting four areas of interest: the role of the evolutionary paradigm, the influence of the country of origin, power relations in and autonomy of subsidiaries and the emergence of a transnational social space. The argument focuses on how these institutionalist approaches may further our understanding of and theoretical insights into the multinational firm.

Résumé

Il est tout à fait surprenant que la recherche sur les organisations dans le domaine des sciences sociales ne s’intéresse que très peu et — en ce qui concerne l’application théorique — que de façon très partiale aux entreprises multinationales. C’est pourquoi, il existe peu de modèles explicatifs de la théorie organisationnelle qui vont au-delà des aspects techniques et économiques des environnements d’entreprise. Ce n’est que récemment que cette problématique a fait son apparition dans les projets de recherche. Le but de cet article est de faire le point sur la discussion actuelle et majoritairement anglophone au sujet de l’influence des institutions et des rationalités locales sur les procédures d’organisation et de management d’une multinationale. Nous présenterons ensuite les bases, les grandes lignes, les concepts clés et les conséquences des théories institutionnelles européennes et américaines. Cet article esquissera et évaluera en particulier l’importance mais aussi les limites de ces théories pour l’analyse des processus de changement dans les entreprises multinationales. En regard du „paradigme évolutionniste“ dominant la recherche internationale sur le management, nous chercherons à mettre en évidence le potentiel d’explication alternative des théories institutionnelles des sciences sociales, en se référant aux quatre aspects suivants: l’influence du pays d’origine, le pouvoir et l’autonomie des filiales ainsi que la création d’espaces sociaux transnationaux.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Bartlett, Christopher/Sumantra Ghoshal (1989): Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, Christopher/Sumantra Ghoshal (1997): The Transnational Organization. In: Derek S. Pugh (Hrsg.), Organization Theory: Selected Readings. London: Penguin, S. 64–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Ritterspach, Florian/Knut Lange/Karin Lohr (2002): Control Mechanisms and Patterns of Reorganization in MNCS. In: Mike Geppert/Dirk Matten/Karen Williams (Hrsg.), Challenges for European Management in a Global Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave, S. 68–95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Belanger, Jaques/Christian Berggren/Torsten Björkman/Christoph Köhler (1999): Being Local Worldwide: ABB and the Challenge of Global Management. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergedorfer Gesprächskreis (2000): Modell Deutschland: Reif für die Globalisierung? Hamburg: Körber-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L./Thomas Luckmann (1980): Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit: Eine Theorie der Wissenssoziologie. Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, Julian/Neil Fry (1998): Subsidiary to Develop New Markets. In: Sloan Management Review 39, S. 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, Julian/Neil Hood (1998): Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capabilities and Charter Change in Foreign-owned Companies. In: Academy of Management Review 23, S. 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, Julian/Neil Hood (2001): Unleash Innovation in Foreign Subsidiaries. In: Harvard Business Review 79, S. 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, Nils (1985): The Irrational Organization. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Peter J. (1996): The Role of Management in International Business Theory: A Meta-analysis and Integration of the Literature on International Business and International Management. In: Management International Review 36, Special Issue, S. 111–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Peter J./Pervez N. Ghauri (Hrsg.) (1999): The Internationalization of the Firm. A Reader. London: International Thomson Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, Mark (1997): Information and Organisation: A New Perspective on the Theory of the Firm. Oxford: Clarenden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, John (1981): Culture, Contingency, and Capitalism in the Cross-national Study of Organizations. In: Barry M. Staw/Larry L. Cummings (Hrsg.), Research in Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 3. Greenwich: JAI Press, S. 303–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, John (2000): Theorizing about Organizations Cross-nationally. In: Joseph L. C. Cheng/Richard B. Peterson (Hrsg.), Advances in International Comparative Management, Vol. 13. Stamford: JAI Press, S. 27–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, John/Alfred Kieser (1979): Organization and Managerial Roles in British and West German Companies: An Examination of the Culture-free Thesis. In: Cornelius J. Lammers/David J. Hickson (Hrsg.), Organizations Alike and Unlike: International and Inter-institutional Studies in the Sociology of Oganizations. London: Routledge, S. 251–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, John/David Faulkner/Robert Pitkethly (2001): The Management of International Acquisitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J./Walter W. Powell (1983): The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. In: American Sociological Review 48, S. 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, Marie-Laure/Jabril Bensedrine (2001): Globalization and Its Limits: The Making of International Regulation. In: Richard Whitley (Hrsg.), The Multinational Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 253–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, Marie-Laure/Sigrid Quack (2002): From National Configuration to Transnational Recombination. Paper presented at the 18th EGOS Colloquium, Barcelona.

  • Djelic, Marie-Laure/Sigrid Quack (Hrsg.) (2003): Globalization and Institutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Tony/Anthony Ferner (2001): Wall Street, „Short-termism“ and the Management of Labour in American Multinationals. ESRC Transnational Communities Programme Conference, Warwick.

  • Egelhoff, William (1993): Information Processing Theory and the Multinational Corporation. In: Sumantra Ghoshal/D. Eleanor Westney (Hrsg.), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. Palgrave: Basingstoke, S. 182–210.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ferner, Anthony. (1997): Country of Origin Effects and HRM in Multinational Companies. In: Human Resource Management Journal 7, S. 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferner, Anthony (2000): The Underpinnings of „Bureaucratic“ Control Systems: HRM in European Multinationals. In: Journal of Management Studies 37, S. 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferner, Anthony/Javier Quintanilla (1998): Multinationals, National Business Systems and HRM: The Enduring Influence of National Identity or a Process of „Anglo-Saxonization“. In: Journal of Human Resource Management 9, S. 710–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geppert, Mike: (2003). Sensemaking and Politics in MNCs: A Comparative Analysis of Vocabularies Within the Global Manufacturing Discourse in One Industrial Sector. In: Journal of Management Inquiry 12, S. 312–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geppert, Mike/Ed Clark (2003): Knowledge and Learning in Transnational Ventures: An Actor-centred Approach. In: Management Decision 41, S. 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geppert, Mike/Dirk Matten/Karen Williams (Hrsg.) (2002): Challenges for European Managment in a Global Context. Experiences from Britain and Germany. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geppert, Mike/Dirk Matten/Karen Williams (2003): Change Management in MNCs: How Global Convergence Intertwines with National Diversities. In: Human Relations 56, S. 807–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geppert, Mike/Karen Williams/Dirk Matten (2003): The Social Construction of Contextual Rationalities in MNCs: An Anglo-German Comparison of Subsidiary Choice. In: Journal of Management Studies 40, S. 617–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, Sumantra/Christopher Bartlett (1993): The Multinational Corporation as an International Network. In: Sumantra Ghoshal/D. Eleanor Westney (Hrsg.), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, S. 77–104.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark (1992): Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. In: Mark Granovetter/Richard Swedberg (Hrsg.), Sociology of Economic Life. Boulder: Westview Press, S. 53–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnigle, Patrick/Kevin R. Murphy/Jeanette N. Cleveland/Noreen Heraty/Michael Morley (2002): Localization in Human Resource Management: Comparing American and European Multinationale Corporations. In: Michael A. Hitt/Joseph L. C. Cheng (Hrsg.), Managing Transnational Firms: Resources, Market Entry and Strategic Alliances. Amsterdam: JAI Press, S. 259–284.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hampden-Turner, Charles/Alfons Trompenaars (1993): The Seven Cultures of Capitalism: Value Systems for Creating Wealth in the United States, Japan, Germany, France, Britain, Sweden, and the Netherlands. New York: Currency/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampden-Turner, Charles/Alfons Trompenaars (2000): Building Cross-cultural Competence: How to Create Wealth from Conflicting Values. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, Anne-Will/Arndt Sorge (2003): The Relative Impact of Country of Origin and Universal Contingencies on Internationalization Strategies and Corporate Control in Multinational Enterprises: Worldwide and European Perspectives. In: Organization Studies 24, S. 187–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, Gunnar (1986): The Hypermodern MNC: A Heterarchy? In: Human Resource Management 25, S. 9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Geert (1994): Cultures and Organizations. Software of the Mind. London: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Geert (2001): Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, J. Rogers/Robert Boyer (1997): Coordination of Economic Actors and Social Systems of Production. In: J. Rogers Hollingsworth/Robert Boyer (Hrsg.), Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, S. 1–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Christel (1992): European Business Systems: Britain and Germany Compared. In: Richard Whitley (Hrsg.), European Business Systems. London: Sage, S. 64–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Christel (1994): Industrial Order and the Transformation of Industrial Relations: Britain, Germany and France. In: Richard Hyman/Anthony Ferner (Hrsg.), New Frontiers in European Industrial Relations. Oxford: Blackwell, S. 167–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Christel (2000): Understanding the Globalization Strategies of German and British Multinational Companies. In: Marc Maurice/Arndt Sorge (Hrsg.), Embedding Organizations: Societal Analysis of Actors, Organizations, and Socio-economic Content. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, S. 188–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Christel (2001): The Emergence of German Transnational Companies: A Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Study of the Globalization Process. In: Glenn Morgan/Peer Hull Kristensen/Richard Whitley (Hrsg.), The Multinational Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Theodore (1983): The Globalization of Markets. In: Harvard Business Review 61, S. 92–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilja, Kari/Keijo Räsänen/Risto Tainio (1992): A Dominant Business Recipe: The Forest Sector in Finland. In: Richard Whitley (Hrsg.), European Business Systems. London: Sage, S. 137–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macharzina, Klaus/Michael-Jörg Oesterle/Dietmar Brodel (2001): Learning in Multinationals. In: Meinolf Dierkes/Ariane Berthoin Antal/John Child/Ikujiro Nonaka (Hrsg.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 631–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, Dirk/Mike Geppert (2002): Institutional Foundations of Manufacturing Strategies in Multinational Corporations: Evidence from Britain and Germany. Paper presented at the 18th EGOS Colloquium, Standing Working Group 1: Comparative Study of Economic Organizations, Barcelona.

  • Matten, Dirk/Mike Geppert (2004): Work Systems in Heavy Engineering: The Role of National Culture and National Institutions in Multinational Corporations. In: Journal of International Management 10, S. 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurice, Marc (1980): Societal Differences in Organizing Manufacturing Units: A Comparison of France, West Germany and Great Britain. In: Organization Studies 1, S. 59–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurice, Marc/Arndt Sorge (Hrsg.) (2000): Embedding Organizations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, Brendan (2002): Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Difference and Their Consequences. In: Human Relations 55, S. 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W, (2000): Globalization — Sources and Effects on National States and Societies. In: International Sociology 15, S. 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W./Brian Rowan (1977): Institutionalized Organizations. In: American Journal of Sociology 83, S. 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Glenn (2001a): The Multinational Firm: Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides. In: Glenn Morgan/Peer Hull Kristensen/Richard Whitley (Hrsg.), The Multinational Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Glenn (2001b): Transnational Communities and Business Systems. In: Global Networks 1, S. 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Glenn/Peer Hull Kristensen/Richard Whitley (Hrsg.) (2001): The Multinational Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, Nitin/Sumantra Ghoshal (1997): The Differentiated Network. Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael (1980): Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, Coimbatore K./Yves L. Doz (1987): The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pries, Ludger (2001): The Approach of Transnational Social Spaces: Responding to New Configurations of the Social and the Spatial. In: Ludger Pries (Hrsg.), New Transnational Social Spaces. London/New York: Routledge, S. 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quack, Sigrid/Glenn Morgan/Richard Whitley (Hrsg.) (1999): National Capitalisms, Global Competition, and Economic Performance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, Philip M./Jitendra V. Singh (1991): Organizational Environment and the Multinational Enterprise. In: Academy of Management Review 16, S. 340–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Peggy (2001): Nationalkulturelle und institutionelle Einflüsse in multinationalen Unternehmen: eine britisch-deutsche Fallstudie. Diplomarbeit, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Richard W. (1998): Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip (1949): TVA and the Grass Roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorge, Arndt (1989): Organisationskulturen: Realer Hintergrund und soziologische Bedeutung einer Modewelle. In: Max Haller/Hans-Joachim Hoffmann-Nowotny/Wolfgang Zapf (Hrsg.), Kultur und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus, S. 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorge, Arndt (1991): Strategic Fit and Societal Effect — Interpreting Cross-national Comparisons of Technology, Organization and Human Resources. In: Organization Studies 12, S. 161–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorge, Arndt (1995): Cross-national Differences in Personnel and Organization. In: Anne-Will Harzing/Johann van Ruysseveldt (Hrsg.), International Human Resource Management. An Integrated Approach. London: Sage, S. 99–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorge, Arndt/Wolfgang Streeck (1988): Industrial Relations and Technical Change: The Case for an Extended Perspective. In: Richard Hyman/Wolfgang Streeck (Hrsg.), New Technology and Industrial Relations. Oxford: Blackwell, S. 19–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorge, Arndt/Malcom Warner (1986): Comparative Factory Organisation. An Anglo-German Comparison of Management and Manpower Manufacturing. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainio, Risto/Mika Huolman/Matti Pulkkinen (2001): The Internationalization of Capital Markets: How International Institutional Investors are Restructuring Finnish Companies. In: Glenn Morgan/Peer Hull Kristensen/Richard Whitley (Hrsg.), The Multinational Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 153–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempel, Anne/Peter Walgenbach (2003): Global Standardization of Organisational Forms and Management Practices? Combining American and European Institutionalism. Paper presented at the 3rd Conference of the European Academy of Management, Milan.

  • Walgenbach, Peter (2000): Die normgerechte Organisation. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max (1988 [1905]): Die protestantische Ethik und der „Geist“ des Kapitalismus. In: ders., Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Bd. 1. Tübingen: Mohr, S. 17–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westney, D. Eleanor (1993): Institutionalization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. In: Sumantra Ghoshal/D. Eleanor Westney (Hrsg.), Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, S. 53–76.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Westney, D. Eleanor/Srilata Zaheer (2001): The Multinational Enterprise as an Organization. In: Alan M. Rugman/Thomas Brewer (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 349–379.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard (Hrsg.) (1992): European Business Systems. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard (1997): Business Systems. In: Arndt Sorge/Malcom Warner (Hrsg.), The IEBM Handbook of Organizational Behaviour. London: International Thomson Business Press, S. 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard (1999): Divergent Capitalisms. The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard/Peer Hull Kristensen (Hrsg.) (1996): The Changing European Firm. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard/Peer Hull Kristensen (1997): Governance at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woywode, Michael (2002): Global Management Concepts and Local Adaptations: Working Groups in the French and German Manufacturing Industry. In: Organization Studies 23, S. 497–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Dean/Oded Shenkar (2002): Institutional Distance and the Multinational Enterprise. In: Academy of Management Review 27, S. 608–618.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geppert, M., Matten, D. & Schmidt, P. Die Bedeutung institutionalistischer Ansätze für das Verständnis von Organisations- und Managementprozessen in multinationalen Unternehmen. Berl.J.Soziol. 14, 379–397 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03204587

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03204587

Navigation