Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 97–105 | Cite as

A Workability Criterion for the Transformed Adiabatic Shear Band Phenomena during Cold Heading of 1038 Steel

  • A. Sabih
  • AM. Elwazri
  • J.A. Nemes
  • S. Yue


A criterion for predicting the workability limits for internal britde failure was developed for cold heading of 1038 steel. The criterion considers internal defects caused by microstructural changes generated by adiabatic shear. This transformation is termed the transformed adiabatic shear band (TASB) phenomena. The defect that develops is the formation ofbritde martensite as a result ofthe temperature rise and fall inside the adiabatic shear band (ASB). In this work, the material is considered to have a TASB defect when the temperature inside the ASB exceeds the phase transformation temperature (AC3). The empirical formulas provided by Andrews[1] were used to determine transformation temperatures. Microhardness testing and etching with 2% Nital and Le Pera etchants were performed on the sectioned specimens to locate and study the TASB. In order to simulate the cold heading process, a drop weight compression test was used and modeled with finite-element analysis (implemented within ABAQUS/Explicit).


Martensite Finite Element Simulation Equivalent Plastic Strain Void Nucleation Thermal Softening 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1._K.W. Andrews: “Empirical Formula for the Calculation of Some Transformation Temperatures,” J Iron Steel I., 1965, 23(7), pp. 721–27.Google Scholar
  2. 2._T. Okamoto, T. Fukuda, and H. Hagita: “Material Fracture in Cold Forging-Systematic Classification of Working Methods and Types of Cracking in Cold Forging,” The Sumitomo Search, vol. 9, Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., U.S., 1973, pp. 216–27.Google Scholar
  3. 3._T.W. right: The Physics and Mathematics if Adiabatic Shear Bands, Cambridge University Press, 2002. Google Scholar
  4. 4._J.S. Zhou, L. Zhen, Y.X. Cui, and D.Z. Yang, et al.: “Transformed Shearing Bands in Strongly Impact Loaded 30 CrMnSiA Steel,” Materials Science Letters, 1998, 17, pp. 391–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5._H.C. Rogers: “Adiabatic Shearing-General Nature and Material Aspects,” Material Behavior under High Stress and Ultrahigh Loading Rates, J. Mescall and V. Weiss, ed., 29th Sagamore Army Materials Research Conference, Jul 19–23, 1982 (Lake Placid, NY), Pergamon Press, NY, 1983, pp. 101–18.Google Scholar
  6. 6._E. Cepus, C.D. Liu, and M.N. Bassim: “The Effect of Microstructure on the Mechanical Properties and Adiabatic Shear Band Formation in a Medium Carbon Steel,” J de Physique IV, 1994, 4(8), P C8 533–58.Google Scholar
  7. 7._N. Nickoletopoulos, Y. Verreman, M. Hone, P. Wanjara, J.A. Nemes, J.J. Jonas, and S. Yue: “Technical Papers Development of a Fracture Criterion for Cold Heading,” Wire J Int., 2001, 34(9), pp. 90–98.Google Scholar
  8. 8._P.W. Lee and H.A. Kuhn: “Fracture in Cold Upset Forging—A Criterion and Model,” Metall. Trans., 1973, 4, pp. 969–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9._M.G. Cockroft and D.J. Latham: “Ductile and Workability of Metals,” J. I. Met., 1968, 96, pp. 33–39.Google Scholar
  10. 10._A. Sabih, J.A. Nemes, N. Nickoletopoulos, and M. Hone: “A Workability Criterion for Internal Ductile Fracture in the Steel Cold Heading Process,” Wire J Int., 2006, 39(3), pp. 155–59.Google Scholar
  11. 11._N. Nickoletopoulos: “Physical and Numerical Modeling of Fracture during Upsetting for Cold Heading Operations,” Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Montreal, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12._G.R.Johnson and W.H. Cook: “A Constitutive Model and Data for Metals Subjected to Large Strains, High Strain Rates and High Temperatures,” Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Ballistic, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1983, pp. 541–47. Google Scholar
  13. 13._R. Liang and A.S. Khan: “A Critical Review ofExperimental Results and Constitutive Models for BCC and FCC Metals over Wide Range of Strain Rates and Temperature,” Int. J. Plasticity, 1999, 15, pp. 963–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14._D. Bai: “Recrystallization and Transformation in Low Carbon Nb and Nb-B Steels,” Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Montreal, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. 15._L. Qiang, X. Yongbo, and M.N. Bassim: “Dynamic Mechanical Properties in Relation to Adiabatic Shear Band Formation in Titanium alloy-Ti17,” Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 2003, 358(1–2), pp. 128–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16._S. Nemat-Nasser, W. Guo, and D.P. Kihl: “Thermomechanical Response of AL-6XN Stainless Steel over a Wide Range of Strain Rates and Temperatures,” J Mech. Phys. Solids, 2001, 49(8), pp. 1823–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17._J.R. Klepaczko, P. Lipinski, and A. Molinari: “An Analysis of the Thermoplastic Catastrophic Shear in Some Metals,” Impact Loading and Dynamic Behavior of Materials, C.Y. Chiem, H.-D. Kunze, and L.W. Meyer, ed., (Bremen), Information gesellschaft, Verlag, 1987, pp. 695–704.Google Scholar
  18. 18._B. Dodd and A.G. Atkins: “Flow Localization in Shear Deformation of Void-Containing and Void-Free Solids,” Acta Metallurgica, 1983, 31, pp. 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19._K.E. Puttick: “Ductile Fracture in Metals,” Phil Mag., 1959, 4, pp. 964–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20._H.C. Rogers: “The Tensile Fracture of Ductile Metals,” AIME Trans. 1960, 218, pp. 498–506.Google Scholar
  21. 21._M.F. Horstemeyer and A.M. Gokhale: “A Void-Crack Nucleation Model for Ductile Metals,” I.J. Solids Struct., 1999, 36(33),pp. 5029–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22._I.G. Park and A.W. Thompson: “Ductile Fracture in Spheroidized 1520 Steel,”" Acta Metallurgica, 1988, 36, pp. 1653–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23._A. Sabih, P. Wanjara, and J.A. Nemes: “Characterization of Internal Voids and Cracks in Cold Heading of Dual Phase Steel,” ISIJ Int., 2005, 45(8), pp. 1179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24._D.J. Bammann, M.L. Chiesa, M.E. Horstemeyer, and L.J. Weingarten: “Failure in Ductile Materials Using Finite Element Simulations,” Structural Crashworthiness and Failure, N. Jones and T. Wierzbicki, ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
  25. 25._Y. Bai and B. Dodd: Adiabatic Shear Localization: Occurrences, Theories and Applications, Pergamon Press, New York, 1992, pp. 1–74.Google Scholar
  26. 26._A.G. Odeshi, S. Al-Ameeri, and M.N. Bassim: “Effect of High Strain Rate on Plastic Deformation of a Low Alloy Steel Subjected to Ballistic Impact,” J. Mater. Process. Tech., 2005, 162–163, pp. 385–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27._H.C. Rogers and C.V. Shastry: Material Factors in Adiabatic Shear Bands in Steels, Shock Waves and High-Strain Rates Phenomena in Metals, M.A. Meyers and L.E. Murr, ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1981, p. 285.Google Scholar
  28. 28._M. Melander and J. Nicolov: “Heating and Cooling Transformation Diagrams for the Rapid HeatTreatment of Two Alloy Steels”," J Heat Treat., 1985, 4, pp. 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29._S. Dey, T. Borvik, O.S. Hopperstad, J.R. Leinum, and M. Langseth: “The Effect of Target Strength on the Perforation of Steel Plates Using Three Different Projectile Nose Shapes,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 2004, 30(8–9), pp. 1005–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Sabih
    • 1
  • AM. Elwazri
    • 2
  • J.A. Nemes
    • 1
  • S. Yue
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill Institute for Advanced MaterialsMcGill University, MontrealQuebecCanada
  2. 2.Department of Metals and Materials EngineeringMcGill UniversityMontreal, QuebecCanada

Personalised recommendations