Acta Theriologica

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 405–409 | Cite as

Horn growth in male pronghornsAntilocapra americana: selection for precocialmaturation in stochastic environments

  • Carl D. Mitchell
  • Christine R. Maher
Article

Abstract

PronghornsAntilocapra americana (Ord, 1818), the sole member of a family unique to North America, grow rapidly and reproduce at an early age. Recent studies have found male pronghorns can grow large horns by 2 to 3 yrs of age. This pattern contrasts with many other ungulates, and it has profound implications for life history strategies. We examine 5 hypotheses that might explain precocial horn growth: (1) sampling bias, (2) nutrition, (3) phylogenetic inertia, (4) reproductive benefits conveyed by rapid horn growth alone, and (5) rapid horn growth as part of a suite of characteristics acquired due to precocial maturation. Hypotheses 1, 2 and 3 do not imply any natural selection, whereas hypotheses 4 and 5 do. We reject hypotheses 1, 2 and 4, and we cannot evaluate hypothesis 3. We conclude that hypothesis 5 most likely explains precocial maturation in male pronghorns, and mortality related to frequent, severe weather events may drive this pattern. We suggest several experiments to further examine relationships between age, size, and horn growth.

Key words

Antilocapra americana ecology evolution pronghorn 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Begon M., Harper J. L. and Townsend C. R. 1990. Ecology. Individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston: 1–945.Google Scholar
  2. Bekenov A. B., Grachev I. A. and Milner-Gulland J. E. 1998. The ecology and management of the saiga antelope in Kazakhstan. Mammal Review 28: 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowyer R. T. 1986. Antler characteristics as related to social status of male southern mule deer. The Southwestern Naturalist 31: 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowyer R. T., Stewart K. M., Kie J. G. and Gasaway W. C. 2001. Fluctuating asymmetry in antlers of Alaskan moose: size matters. Journal of Mammalogy 82: 814–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown D. E., Fagan W. F. and Turner B. 2003. Pronghorn sheath growth, age and precipitation on a ranch in southern New Mexico. Pronghorn Antelope Workshop Proceedings 20: 17–23.Google Scholar
  6. Bubenik A. B. 1990. Epigenetical, morphological, physiological, and behavioral aspects of evolution of horns, pronghorns, and antlers. [In: Horns, pronghorns, and antlers. G. A. Bubenik and A. B. Bubenik, eds]. Springer-Verlag, New York: 3–113.Google Scholar
  7. Byers J. A. 1997. American pronghorn. Social adaptations and ghosts of predators past. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London: 1–300.Google Scholar
  8. Byers J. A., Byers A. A. and Dunn S. J. 2006. A dry summer diminishes mate search effort by pronghorn females: evidence for a significant cost of mate search. Ethology 113: 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byers J. A., Moodie J. D. and Hall N. 1994. Pronghorn females choose vigorous mates. Animal Behaviour 47: 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charlesworth B. 1994. Evolution in age-structured populations. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clutton-Brock T. H. 1988. Introduction. [In: Reproductive success. T. H. Clutton-Brock, ed]. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London: 1–6.Google Scholar
  12. Clutton-Brock T. H., Guiness F. E. and Albon S. D. 1982. Red deer. Behaviour and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press Chicago: 1–378.Google Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock T. H. and Pemberton J. 2003. Soay sheep. Dynamics and selection in an island population. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fandos P. and Vigal C. R. 1988. Body weight and horn length in relation to age of the Spanish wild goat. Acta Theriologica 33: 339–344.Google Scholar
  15. Festa-Bianchet M., Coltman D. W., Turelli L. and Jorgenson J. T. 2004. Relative allocation of horn and body growth in bighorn rams varies with resource availability. Behavioral Ecology 15: 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gavin T. A. 1991. Why ask “why”: the importance of evolutionary biology in wildlife science. Journal of Wildlife Management 55: 760–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geist V. 1971. Mountain sheep. A study in behavior and evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1–383.Google Scholar
  18. Geist V. 1998. Deer of the world. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg: 1–421.Google Scholar
  19. McCorquodale S. M., Eberhardt L. E. and Sargeant G. A. 1989. Antler characteristics in a colonizing elk population. Journal of Wildlife Management 53: 618–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Menzel K. 1980. Weights and horn measurements of Nebraska pronghorns: first seasons and twenty years later. Pronghorn Antelope Workshop Proceedings 9: 279–284.Google Scholar
  21. Mitchell C. D. and Maher C. R. 2001. Are horn characteristics related to age in male pronghorns? Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 908–916.Google Scholar
  22. Min S. E. 1997. Variation in sexually dimorphic traits of male pronghorns. Journal of Mammalogy 78: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Gara B. W. 1990. The pronghornAntilocapra americana. [In: Horns, pronghorns, and antlers. G. A. Bubenik and A. B. Bubenik, eds]. Springer-Verlag, New York: 231–264.Google Scholar
  24. O’Gara B. W. 2004a. Physical characteristics. [In: Pronghorn ecology and Management. B. W. O’Gara and J. D. Yoakum, eds]. University Press of Colorado, Boulder: 109–143.Google Scholar
  25. O’Gara B. W. 2004b. Behavior. [In: Pronghorn ecology and Management. B. W. O’Gara and J. D. Yoakum, eds]. University Press of Colorado, Boulder: 145–194.Google Scholar
  26. O’Gara B. W. 2004c. Mortality factors. [In: Pronghorn ecology and Management. B. W. O’Gara and J. D. Yoakum, eds]. University Press of Colorado, Boulder: 379–408.Google Scholar
  27. O’Gara B. W. 2004d. Reproduction. [In: Pronghorn ecology and Management. B. W. O’Gara and J. D. Yoakum, eds]. University Press of Colorado, Boulder: 275–298.Google Scholar
  28. Pérez-Barbería F. J., Robles L. and Nores C. 1996. Horn growth pattern in Cantabrian chamoisRupicapra pyrenaica parva: Influence of sex, age and phaenology. Acta Theriologica 41: 83–92.Google Scholar
  29. Schaller G. B. 1977. Mountain monarchs. Wild sheep and goats of the Himalaya. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1–425.Google Scholar
  30. Stearns S. C. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1–264.Google Scholar
  31. Stewart K. M., Bowyer R. T., Kie J. G. and Gasaway W. C. 2000. Antler size relative to body mass in moose: tradeoffs associated with reproduction. Alces 36: 77–83.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Bialowieza, Poland 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl D. Mitchell
    • 1
  • Christine R. Maher
    • 2
  1. 1.U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceWayanUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Southern MainePortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations