Skip to main content
Log in

Mariner anticipation and performance

The prevention of casualty

  • Published:
WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collisions and groundings continue to take their toll on seafarers and the environment. Much has been said about the associated role of human factors. STCW95 endeavored to create a closer relationship between what is taught and what is needed to handle the demands of the operational environment. Technological developments such as ARPA, and in the future AIS, imply access to more data. With a view to determining how data should be presented and used, this study examines the capabilities of mariners to identify and initiate an appropriate course of action in an encounter where the need for two targets to maneuver to avoid collision with each other changes our own vessel’s passing distance from a safe to an unsafe state. Such a capability can generally add to the probability of a successful encounter through anticipating the resulting conflict with our own vessel and through taking appropriate early action. The outcome of this study, reported in this paper, was that very few senior officers and masters displayed the advanced level of anticipation skills that would provide the situation awareness needed for the encounter presented. Such outcomes may point to the need for inclusion of specific training in anticipation skills within the maritime educational system and/or for the provision of decision support systems which assist the development of situation awareness and identification of an appropriate course of action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rasmussen, J. et al.:New Technology and Human Error. New York: John Wiley & Sons., 1987, p. 348.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CBSSE:Performance Assessment for the Workplace. Washington: National Academy Press, 1991. Vol.1,p59.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Singh, S.:Assessment of performance on bridge simulator exercises. In:Proceedings of the 11th. International Simulator Lecturers’ Conference. International Maritime Lecturers’ Association (IMLA), 2000, pp. 86–93

  4. Woods, D.:Tasks, Errors and Mental Models. London: Taylor and Francis, 1988. pp 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  5. ibid..

    Google Scholar 

  6. Orasanu, J., Martin, L.:Errors in decision making: A factor in accidents and incidents. InProceedings: HESSD, 1998, p.101.

  7. Gerhardt, D. et al.:Analysis of decision making in maritime collision avoidance manoeuvres. In:Proceedings: Fourth International Symposium on Marine Traffic Service. Bremen, 1981, p. 90.

  8. Das Seeamt: Judgement MAKARSKA – SYDNEY EXPRESS Collision. Report of the German Court of Inquiry 1979 — German Text.

  9. Klerk, J., Singh, S.: Effective exercises. In:Proceedings: 4 th International Radar and Navigation Simulator Lecturers’ Conference. Mariehamn: International Maritime Lecturers’ Association (IMLA), 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Singh, S.:Sector displays for traffic monitoringand assessment. InProceedings: Symposium on Vessel Traffic Service. Bremen: Hochschule für Nautik, 1981, p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  11. NAE:Industrial Environmental Performance Metrics: Challenges and Opportunities. Washington: The National Academy Press, 1999, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, S.J. Mariner anticipation and performance. WMU J Marit Affairs 2, 33–48 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195032

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195032

Keywords

Navigation