Skip to main content
Log in

Annual use of water sources by reintroduced Rocky Mountain bighorn sheepOvis canadensis canadensis: effects of season and drought

  • Published:
Acta Theriologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water sources are important for the conservation and management of bighorn sheepOvis canadensis (Shaw, 1804). Little is known, however, regarding the use of water by reintroduced Rocky Mountain bighornsO. c. canadensis (Shaw, 1804). Our purpose was to quantify use of water sources by bighorns to test hypotheses related to the value of these sites on Antelope Island, Utah, USA, from July 2005 to December 2006. We predicted that bighorns would increase the number and duration of visits to water during summer. Moreover, we predicted that animals would visit and spend more time at water during drought. Our results indicate that bighorns visited and spent more time around water in summer. These animals, however, did not visit and spend more time at water during drought. Nevertheless, use of water sources increased during times of similar precipitation that followed drought, indicating a potential time-lag in water use by bighorns. Our results underscore the importance of water for reintroduced bighorns in the deserts of western USA, and indicate that animals congregate in riparian areas near water and thereby may facilitate the spreading of diseases and parasites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alderman J. A., Krausman P. R. and Leopold B. D. 1989. Diel activity of female desert bighorn sheep in western Arizona. The Journal of Wildlife Management 53: 264–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatley J. C. 1974. Phenological events and their environmental triggers in Mojave Desert ecosystems. Ecology 55: 856–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J. 1986. Wild horses of the Great Basin: social competition and population size. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleich V. C. 2003. The potential for botulism in desert--dwelling mountain sheep. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 47: 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleich V. C., Andrew N. G., Martin M. J., Mulcahy G. P., Pauli A. M. and Rosenstock S. S. 2006. Quality of water available to wildlife in desert environments: Comparisons among anthropogenic and natural sources. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34: 627–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleich V. C., Bowyer R. T. and Wehausen J. D. 1997. Sexual segregation in mountain sheep: resources or predation? Wildlife Monographs 134: 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunt M. H., Dawson H. A. and Thorne E. T. 1972. The birth weights and gestation in captive Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep. Journal of Mammalogy 58: 106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden D. C., Anderson A. E. and Medin D. E. 1984. Sampling plans for mule deer sex and age ratios. The Journal of Wildlife Management 48: 500–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer R. T. 1984. Sexual segregation in southern mule deer. Journal of Mammalogy 65: 410–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer R. T. 1991. Timing of parturition and lactation in southern mule deer. Journal of Mammalogy 72: 138–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer R. T. 2004. Sexual segregation in ruminants: definitions, hypotheses, and implications for conservation and management. Journal of Mammalogy 85: 1039–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer R. T., Bleich V. C., Manteca X., Whiting J. C. and Stewart K. M. 2007. Sociality, mate choice, and timing of mating in American bison (Bison bison): effects of large males. Ethology 113: 1048–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broyles B. and Cutler T. L. 1999. Effect of surface water on desert bighorn sheep in the Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, southwestern Arizona. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27: 1082–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broyles B. and Cutler T. L. 2001. Reply to Rosenstocket al. (2001) regarding effects of water on desert bighorn sheep at Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, Arizona. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 738–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundige G. C. and McCabe T. R. 1986. Summer habitat use by bighorn ewes and lambs. Northern Wild Sheep and Goat Council 15: 408–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buechner H. K. 1960. The bighorn sheep in the United States, its past, present, and future. Wildlife Monographs 4: 1–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkett D. W. and Thompson B. C. 1994. Wildlife association with human-altered water sources in semiarid vegetation communities. Conservation Biology 8: 682–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain J. W., Krausman P. R., Rosenstock S. S. and Turner J. C. 2006. Mechanisms of thermoregulation and water balance in desert ungulates. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34: 570–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell B. H. and Remington R. 1979. Bighorn use of artificial water sources in the Buckskin Mountains, Arizona. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 23: 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover W. J. 1980. Practical nonparametric statistics. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York: 1–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler T. L. and Swann D. E. 1999. Using remote photography in wildlife ecology: a review. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27: 571–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demarchi D. A. and Mitchell H. B. 1973. The Chilcotin River bighorn population. Canadian Field Naturalist 87: 433–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan B. F. 2006. Water developments and desert bighorn sheep: implications for conservation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34: 642–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas C. L. 1988. Decline of desert bighorn sheep in the Black Mountains of Death Valley. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 32: 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epps C.W., McCullough D. R., Wehausen J. D., Bleich V. C. and Rechel J. L. 2004. Effects of climate change on population persistence of desert-dwelling mountain sheep in California. Conservation Biology 18: 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks W. S. and Tullous R. 2002. Distribution of pronghorn (Antilocapra americana Ord) on Antelope Island State Park, Utah, USA, before and after establishment of recreational trails. Natural Areas Journal 22: 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M. 1988. Age-specific reproduction of bighorn ewes in Alberta, Canada. Journal of Mammalogy 69: 157–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester D. J. and Littell R. C. 1976. Influence of rainfall on lungworm infections in bighorn sheep. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 12: 48–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geist V. 1968. On delayed social and physical maturation in mountain sheep. Canadian Journal of Zoology 46: 899–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geist V. 1971. Mountain sheep: a study in behavior and evolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 1–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hass C. C. 1997. Seasonality of births in bighorn sheep. Journal of Mammalogy 78: 1251–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger J. R., Wehausen J. D. and Bleich V. C. 1991. Evaluation of time-lapse photography to estimate population parameters. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 35: 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kie J. G., Bowyer R. T. and Stewart K. M. 2003. Ungulates in western coniferous forests: habitat relationships, population dynamics, and ecosystem processes. [In: Mammal community dynamics: management and conservation in the coniferous forests of Western North America. C. J. Zabel and R. G. Anthony, eds]. Cambridge University Press, New York: 296–340.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krausman P. R. 2000. An introduction to the restoration of bighorn sheep. Restoration Ecology 8: 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krausman P. R. and Bowyer R. T. 2003. Mountain sheep (Ovis canadensis andO. dalli). [In: Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation. J. A. Chapman, G. A. Feldhamer and B. C. Thompson, eds]. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore: 1095–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausman P. R. and Leopold B. D. 1986a. Habitat components for desert bighorn sheep in the Harquahala Mountains, Arizona. Journal of Wildlife Management 50: 504–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krausman P. R. and Leopold B. D. 1986b. The importance of small populations of desert bighorn sheep. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 51: 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie D. M. and Douglas C. L. 1979. Desert bighorn sheep of the River Mountains, Nevada. Wildlife Monographs 66: 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie D. M. and Douglas C. L. 1980. Human disturbance at water sources of desert bighorn sheep. Wildlife Society Bulletin 8: 284–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshal J. P., Bleich V. C., Krausman P. R., Reed M. L. and Andrew N. G. 2006a. Factors affecting habitat use and distribution of desert mule deer in an arid environment. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34: 609–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshal J. P., Krausman P. R., Bleich V. C., Rosenstock S. S. and Ballard W. B. 2006b. Gradients of forage biomass and ungulate use near wildlife water developments. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34: 620–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oehler M. W., Bowyer R. T. and Bleich V. C. 2003. Home ranges of female mountain sheep,Ovis canadensis nelsoni: effects of precipitation in a desert ecosystem. Mammalia 67: 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson D. D., Shannon J. M.,Whiting J. C. and Flinders J. T. (in press). History, status, and population structure of California bighorn in Utah. Biennial Symposium of the Northern Wild Goat and Sheep Council.

  • Payer D. C. and Coblentz B. E. 1997. Seasonal variation in California bighorn ram (Ovis canadensis californiana) habitat use and group size. Northwestern Science 71: 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautenstrauch K. R. and Krausman P. R. 1989. Influence of water availability and rainfall on movements of desert mule deer. Journal of Mammalogy 70: 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remington R. D. and Schork M. A. 1970. Statistics with applications to the biological and health sciences. Prentice--Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs: 1–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson J. D., Fairbanks W. S. and Cornicelli L. 2008. Ecology of gastropod and bighorn sheep hosts of lungworm on isolated, semi-arid mountain ranges in Utah, USA. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 44: 28–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rominger E. M., Whitlaw H. A., Weybright D. L., Dunn W. C. and Ballard W. B. 2004. The influence of mountain lion predation on bighorn sheep translocations. The Journal of Wildlife Management 68: 993–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock S. S., Ballard W. B. and de Vos Jr. J. C. 1999. Viewpoint: benefits and impacts of wildlife water developments. Journal of Range Management 52: 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock S. S., Bleich V. C., Rabe M. J. and Reggiardo C. 2005. Water quality at wildlife water sources in the Sonoran Desert, United States. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58: 623–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock S. S., Hervert J. J., Bleich V. C. and Krausman P. R. 2001. Muddying the water with poor science: a reply to Broyles and Cutler. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 734–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin E. S. and Bleich V. C. 2005. Sexual segregation: a necessary consideration in wildlife conservation. [In: Sexual segregation in vertebrates: ecology of the two sexes. K. E. Ruckstuhl and P. Neuhaus, eds]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 379–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin E. S., Boyce W. M., Stermer C. J. and Torres S. G. 2002. Bighorn sheep habitat use and selection near an urban environment. Biological Conservation 104: 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton D. M. and Haywood J. 1985. Early mother young interactions in California bighorn sheep,Ovis canadensis californiana. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 868–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton D. M., Peterson R. G., Haywood J. and Bottrell A. 1984. Gestation period inOvis canadensis. Journal of Mammalogy 65: 337–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton D. M., Shank C. C. and Wikeem B. M. 1999. Natural history of Rocky Mountain and California bighorn sheep. [In: Mountain Sheep of North America. R. Valdez and P. R. Krausman, eds]. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson: 78–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer F. J., Bleich V. C. and Gudorf M. A. 2000a. Restoration of bighorn sheep metapopulations in and near western National Parks. Restoration Ecology 8: 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer F. J., Papouchis C. M. and Symonds K. K. 2000b. Translocations as a tool for restoring populations of bighorn sheep. Restoration Ecology 8: 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith T. S. and Flinders J. T. 1992. Evaluation of mountain sheep habitat in Zion National Park, Utah. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 36: 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith T. S., Flinders J. T. and Olsen D. W. 1988. Status and distribution of Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep in Utah. Biennial Symposium of the Northern Wild Goat and Sheep Council 6: 5–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith T. S., Flinders J. T. and Winn D. S. 1991. A habitat evaluation procedure for Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep in the Intermountain West. Great Basin Naturalist 51: 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift P. K., Wehausen J. D., Ernest H. B., Singer R. S., Pauli A. M., Kinde H., Rocke T. E. and Bleich V. C. 2000. Desert bighorn sheep mortality due to presumptive type C botulism in California. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 36: 184–189.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner J. C. 1970. Water consumption by desert bighorn sheep. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 14: 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner J. C., Douglas C. L., Hallam C. R., Krausman P. R. and Ramey R. R. 2004. Determination of critical habitat for the endangered Nelson’s bighorn sheep in southern California. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32: 427–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdez R. and Krausman P. R. 1999. Description, distribution, and abundance of mountain sheep in North America. [In: Mountain sheep of North America. R. Valdez and P. R. Krausman, eds]. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson: 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehausen J. D. and Ramey R. R. 2000. Cranial morphometric and evolutionary relationships in the northern range ofOvis canadensis. Journal of Mammalogy 81: 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh S. L., Atwood N. D., Goodrich S. and Higgins L. C. 1993. A Utah flora. 2nd ed. Brigham Young University, Provo: 1–986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting J. C., Bowyer R. T. and Flinders J. T. 2008. Young bighorn (Ovis canadensis) males: can they successfully woo females? Ethology 113: 32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker D. G., Ostermann S. D. and Boyce W. M. 2004. Genetic variability of reintroduced California bighorn sheep in Oregon. The Journal of Wildlife Management 68: 850–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jericho C. Whiting.

Additional information

Associated editor was Joseph F. Merritt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whiting, J.C., Bowyer, R.T. & Flinders, J.T. Annual use of water sources by reintroduced Rocky Mountain bighorn sheepOvis canadensis canadensis: effects of season and drought. Acta Theriol 54, 127–136 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03193168

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03193168

Key words

Navigation