Skip to main content
Log in

Foraging habitats of bats in southern Finland

  • Published:
Acta Theriologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We determined the foraging habitats of the northern batEptesicus nilssonii (Keyserling et Blasius, 1839), Brandt’s batMyotis brandtii (Eversmann, 1845), whiskered batMyotis mystacinus (Kuhl, 1819), Daubenton’s batMyotis daubentonii (Kuhl, 1819) and brown long-eared batPlecotus auritus (Linnaeus, 1758) in southern Finland. Among these species, we compared the diversities of foraging habitats, linear feature preference and the bats’ tendencies to forage simultaneously.Eptesicus nilssonii was the most opportunistic, foraging in a wide range of habitats.Myotis daubentonii (94%) foraged mainly on water habitats, whileM. brandtii/mystacinus (89%) andP. auritus (66%) foraged mainly in forest habitats. The diversities of foraging habitats used byE. nilssonii andP. auritus were higher than those ofM. brandtii/mystacinus andM. daubentonii. Both E.nilssonii andP. auritus foraged mostly alone or in small numbers, whileM. brandtii/mystacinus tended to gather in large numbers to forage in the same habitat. Half ofE. nilssonii and 46% ofM. daubentonii foraged over linear features, while other species did not use linear features to such an extent. Management and conservation of foraging habitats are needed especially forM. brandtii/mystacinus andM. daubentonii, which are more specialized thanE. nilssonii and P. auritus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlén I. 1981. Identification of Scandinavian bats by their sounds (Report 6). Swedish Univeristy of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Wildlife Ecology, Uppsala, Sweden: 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlén I. 1990. Identification of bats in flight. Swedish Society for Conservation of Nature and the Swedish Youth Association for Environmental Studies and Conservation, Stockholm: 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlén I. and Baagøe H. J. 1999. Use of ultrasound detectors for bat studies in Europe: experiences from field identification, surveys, and monitoring. Acta Chiropterologica 1: 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge H. D. J. N. and Rautenbach I. L. 1987. Morphology, echolocation and resource partitioning in insectivorous bats. Journal of Animal Ecology 56: 763–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson M. E. and Racey P. A. 1991. Feeding behaviour of captive brown long-eared bats,Plecotus auritus. Animal Behaviour 42: 489–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barataud M. 1990. Eléments sur le comportement alimentaire des Oreillards brun et gris,Plecotus auritus (Linnaeus, 1758) etPlecotus austriacus (Fischer, 1829). Le Rhinolophe 7: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck A. 1995. Fecal analyses of European bat species. Myotis 32–33: 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonman A. M., Boonman M., Bretschneider F. and van de Grind W. A. 1998. Prey detection in trawling insectivorous bats: duckweed affects hunting behaviour in Daubenton’s bats,Myotis daubentonii. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 44: 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonman M. 1996. Monitoring bats on their hunting grounds. Myotis 34: 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark B. S., Leslie D. M. and Carter T. S. 1993. Foraging activity of adult female ozark big-eared bats (Plecotus townsendii ingens) in summer. Journal of Mammalogy 74: 422–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong J. 1995. Habitat use and species richness of bats in a patchy landscape. Acta Theriologica 40: 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong J. and Ahlén I. 1991. Factors affecting the distribution pattern of bats in Uppland, central Sweden. Holartic Ecology 14: 92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs N. C. and Racey P. A. 2006. The use by bats of habitat features in mixed farmland in Scotland. Acta Chiropterologica 8: 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs N. C. and Racey P. A. 2007. Temporal and spatial differences in the emission of calls by pipistrelle batsPipistrellus pipistrellus andP. pygmaeus. Acta Theriologica 52: 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drebs A., Nordlund A., Karlsson P., Helminen J. and Rissanen P. 2002. Tilastoja Suomen ilmastosta 1971–2000 — Climatological statistics of Finland 1971–2000. Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki: 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunchamp J. E., Sparks D. W. and Whitaker J. O. Jr 2004. Foraging-habitat selection by bats at an urban-rural interface: comparison between a successful and less successful species. Canadian Journal of Zoology 82: 1157–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eklöf J. and Jones G. 2002. Use of vision in prey detection by brown long-eared bats,Plecotus auritus. Animal Behaviour 66: 949–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman M. and de Jong J. 1996. Local patterns of distribution and resource utilisation of four bats species (Myotis brandtii, Eptesicus nilssonii, Plecotus auritus andPipistrellus pipistrellus) in patchy and continuous environments. Journal of Zoology, London 238: 571–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle A. C., Racey P. A. and Speakman J. R. 1996. Habitat exploitation by a gleaning bat,Plecotus auritus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 351B: 921–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton M. B. 1990. The foraging behaviour and ecology of animal eating bats. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton M. B. 1995a. Natural history and biosonar signals. [In: Hearing by bats. A. N. Popper and R. R. Fay, eds]. Springer-Verlag, New York: 37–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton M. B. 1995b. Constraint and flexibility — bats as predators, bats as prey. [In: Ecology, evolution and behaviour of bats. P. A. Racey and S. M. Swift, eds]. Proceedings of Symposia Zoological Society of London 67: 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluckiger P. F. and Beck A. 1995. Observations on the habitat use for hunting byPlecotus austriacus (Fischer, 1829). Myotis 32–33: 121–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlonger C. L., Dewar H. J. and Fenton M. B. 1987. Habitat use by foraging insectivorous bats. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65: 284–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaisler J., Zukal J., Nesvadboda J., Chytil J. and Obuch J. 1996. Species diversity and relative abundance of small mammals (Insectivora, Chiroptera, Rodentia) in the Palava Biosphere Reserve of UNESCO. Acta Societas Zoologicae Bohemicae 60: 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haupt M., Menzler S. and Schmidt S. D. 2006. Felxibility of habitat use inEptesicus nilssonii: Does the species profit from anthropogenically altered habitats? Journal of Mammalogy 87: 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones G. and Rayner J. M. V. 1988. Flight performance, foraging tactics and echolocation in free-living Daubenton’s batMyotis daubentonii (Chiroptera: Vespertilonidae). Journal of Zoology, London 215: 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalko E. K. V. and Braun M. 1991. Foraging areas as an important factor in bat conservation: estimated capture attempt and success rate ofMyotis daubentonii. Myotis 29: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalko E. K. V and Schnitzler H.-U. 1989. The echolocation and hunting behaviour of Daubenton’s bat,Myotis daubentonii. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 24: 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalko E. K. V. and Schnitzler H.-U. 1993. Plasticity in echolocation signals of European pipistrelle bats in search flight: implications for habitat use and prey detection. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 33: 415–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapteyn K. 1995. [Bats in the landscape]. Schuyt & Co, Haarlem: 224. [In Dutch]

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokurewicz T. 1995. Increased population of Daubenton’s batMyotis daubentonii (Kuhl, 1819). (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in Poland. Myotis 32–33: 155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz T. H. 1974. Feeding ecology of a temperate insectivorous bat (Myotis velifer). Ecology 55: 639–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesiński G., Kowalski M., Domański J., Dzięciolowski R., Laskowska-Dzięciolowska K. and Dzięgielewska M. 2004. The importance of small cellars to bat hibernation in Poland. Mammalia 68: 345–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran A. 2007. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford: 114–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masing M. 1980. [On the hibernation sites of bats in Estonia]. [In: Bats (Chiroptera). A. P. Kuzjakin and K. Panjutin, eds]. Nauka, Moscow: 196–198. [In Russian]

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell-Jones A. J., Amori G., Bogdanowicz W., Kryštufek B., Reijnders P. J. H., Spitzenberger F., Stubbe M., Thissen J. B. M., Vohralík V. and Zima J. (eds) 1999. The Atlas of European Mammals. T. & A. D. Poyser, London: 110–111, 140–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G. 1990. Auditory adaptations for prey capture in echolocating bats. Physiological Reviews 70: 615–641.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nyholm E. S. 1965. Zür Ökologie vonMyotis mystacinus undM. daubentonii (Chiroptera). Annales Zoologici Fennici 2: 77–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson Elektronik Ab. 2004. Sound analysis programme. Pettersson Elektronik Ab, Uppsala.

  • Racey P. A. 1998. The importance of the riparian environment as a habitat for British bats. [In: Behaviour and ecology of riparian mammals. N. Dunstone and M. L. Norman, eds]. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, London 71: 69–91.

  • Racey P. A. and Swift S. M. 1985. Feeding ecology ofPipistrellus pipistrellus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) during pregnancy and lactation. I. Foraging behaviour. Journal of Animal Ecology 54: 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russ J. 1999. The bats of Britain and Ireland. Echolocation calls, sound analysis, and species identification. Alana Ecology Ltd. Bishops Castle: 1–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ J. M. and Montgomery W. I. 2002. Habitat associations of bats in Northern Ireland: implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 108: 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo D. and Jones G. 2003. Use of foraging habitats by bats in a Mediterranean area determined by acoustic surveys: conservation implications. Ecography 26: 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydell J. 1986. Foraging and diet of the northern batEptesicus nilssoni in Sweden. Holarctic Ecology 9: 272–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydell J. 1989. Food habits of northern (Eptesicus nilssoni) and brown long-eared (Plecotus auritus) bats in Sweden. Holarctic Ecology 12: 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydell J. 1991. Seasonal use of illuminated areas by foraging northern batsEptesicus nilssonii. Holartic Ecology 14: 562–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydell J. 1992. Ocurrence of bats in northernmost Sweden (65°C) and their feeding ecology in summer. Journal of Zoology, London 227: 517–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydell J., Miller L. A. and Jensen M. E. 1999. Echolocation constraints of Daubenton’s bat foraging over water. Functional Ecology 13: 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H.-U. and Kalko E. K. V. 1998. How echolocating bats search and find food. [In: Bat biology and conservation. T. H. Kunz and P. A. Racey, eds]. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC: 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H.-U. and Kalko E. K. V. 2001. Echolocation by insecteating bats. Bioscience 51: 557–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H.-U., Moss C. F. and Denzinger A. 2003. From spatial orientation to food acquisition in echolocating bats. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution 18: 366–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schober W. and Grimmberger E. 1997. The bats of Europe and North America. T.F.H. Publications, Inc. New Jersey: 1–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiel C. B., McAney C. M. and Fairley J. S. 1991. Analysis of the diet of Natterer’s batMyotis nattereri and the common long-eared batPlecotus auritus in the west of Ireland. Journal of Zoology, London 223: 299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemers B. M., Dietz C., Nill D. and Schnitzler H.-U. 2001a.Myotis daubentonii is able to catch small fish. Acta Chiropterologica 3: 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemers B. M., Stilz P. and Schnitzler H.-U. 2001b. The acoustic advantage of hunting at low heights above water: behavioural experiments on the European ‘trawling’ batsMyotis capaccinii, M. dasycneme andM. daubentonii. The Journal of Experimental Biology 204: 3843–3854.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siivonen L. and Sulkava S. 1999. [Mammals of the North]. Otava: 1–224. [In Finnish]

  • Siivonen Y. and Wermundsen T. 2003. First records of Myotis dasycneme andPipistrellus pipistrellus in Finland. Vespertilio 7: 177–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siivonen Y. and Wermundsen T. (in press). Distribution of Natterer’s batMyotis nattereri in Finland. Nyctalus.

  • Siivonen Y. and Wermundsen T. 2008. Characteristics of winter roosts of bats it southern Finland. Mammalia 72: 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc. 1989–2005. SPSS for Windows, version 14.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc., Chicago.

  • Statistics Finland 2005. Land use 1960–1999. Statistical yearbook of Finland 2004. Tilastokeskus, Helsinki: 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift S. M. 1998. Long-eared bats. T. & A. D. Poyser, London: 1–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift S. M. and Racey P. A. 1983. Resource partitioning in two species of vespertilionid bats (Chiroptera) occupying the same roost. Journal of Zoology, London 200: 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taake K. H. 1992. Strategien der Ressourcennutzung an Waldgewässern jagender Fledermäuse (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Myotis 30: 7–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulvi T. and Lakso E. 2005. [Lake management]. Ympäristöopas 114. Edita, Helsinki: 1–336. [In Finnish]

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan N., Jones G. and Harris S. 1997. Habitat use by bats (Chiroptera) assessed by means of a broad-band acoustic method. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 716–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh A. L. and Harris S. 1996a. Foraging habitat preferences of vespertilionid bats in Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 508–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh A. L. and Harris S. 1996b. Factors determining the abundance of vespertilionid bats in Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 519–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh A. L. and Mayle B. A. 1991. Bat activity in different habitats in a mixed lowland woodland. Myotis 29: 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wermundsen T. and Siivonen Y. (in press). Factors affecting the distribution of Daubenton’s bat in Finland: comparison with the Northern bat. Myotis.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terhi Wermundsen.

Additional information

Associate editor was Karol Zub.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wermundsen, T., Siivonen, Y. Foraging habitats of bats in southern Finland. Acta Theriol 53, 229–240 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03193119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03193119

Key words

Navigation