Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of MEGX (monoethylglycinexylidide) and antipyrine tests in patients with liver cirrhosis

  • Published:
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The aim of the study was to compare the feasibility of the MEGX (monoethylglycinexylidide) and antipyrine tests in reference to standard biochemical parameters used for liver assessment in cirrhotic patients. The study was carried out in 44 subjects: 14 healthy controls and 30 cirrhotic patients classified according to the Child-Pugh’s score to subgroups A (n=11), B (n=12) and C (n=7). All subjects underwent two dynamic liver tests, i.e. MEGX (monoethylglycinexylidide) and antipyrine test in a crossover schedule with at least 5-day interval. For the MEGX, lidocaine was administrated intravenously, at a dose of 1 mg/kg, and blood samples for MEGX assay were collected after 15 minutes. MEGX concentrations were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. The antipyrine concentrations were evaluated following a single oral administration of 1000 mg antipyrine. The blood was sampled for 24 hours after the drug administration, and antipyrine concentrations were measured spectrophotometrically. Standard biochemical parameters used for liver assessment were measured by means of routine laboratory methods. It was concluded that in patients liver with cirrhosis, liver dynamic tests were better predictors of hepatic function. The MEGX test was more feasible in clinical setting, but it was noted that antipyrine test was more sensitive in staging liver cirrhosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oellrich M., Rande E. and Burdelski M. (1987): Monoethylglycinexylidide formation kinetics: a novel approach to assessment of liver function. J. Clin. Chem. Biochem., 25: 845–853.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McPherson G.A., Benjamin I.S., Boobis A.R., Brodie M.J., Hampolen C. and Blumgard L.H. (1982): Antipyrine elimination as a dynamic test of hepatic functional integrity in obstructive jaundice. Gut, 23: 734–738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scott N.R. (1988): Caffeine clearance and biotransformation in patients with chronic liver disease. Clin. Sci., 74: 377–382.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ceasar J., Shaldon S., Chiandussi L., Guevara L. and Sherlock S. (1961): The use of indocyanine green in the measurement of hepatic blood flow and a test of hepatic function. Clin. Sci., 21: 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Saibara T., Onishi S., Sone J., Yamamoto N., Shimahara Y., Mori K., et al. (1991): Arterial ketone body ratio as a possible indicator for liver transplantation in fulminant hepatic failure. Transplanation, 51: 782–786.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brodie B.B., Axelrod J., Soberman R and Levy B.R. (1949): The estimation of antipyrine in biological materials. J. Biol. Chem., 179: 25–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oellerich M., Burdelski M., Ringe B., et al. (1989): Lignocaine metabolite formation as a measure of pre-transplant liver function. Lancet, i: 640–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oellerich M., Burdelski M., Lautz H.U., et al. (1991): Predictors of one year pretransplant survival in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology, 14: 1029–1034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arrigoni A., Gindro T., Aimo G., et al. (1994): Monoethylglycinexylidide test: a prognostic indicator of survival in cirrhosis. Hepatology, 20: 383–387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shiffman M.L., Luketic V.A., Sanyal A.J., et al. (1994): Hepatic lidocaine metabolism and liver histology in patients with chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. Hepatology, 19: 933–940.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reichen J. MEGX test in hepatology: the long-sought ultimate quantitative liver function test? J. Hepatol., 19: 4–7.

  12. Testa R., Caglieris S., Risso D., et al. (1997): Monoethylglycinexylidide formation measurement as a hepatic function test to assess severity of chronic liver disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol., 92: 2268–2273.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Engel G., Hofman U., Heidemann H., Cosme J. and Eichelbaum M. (1996): Antipyrine as a probe for humans oxidative drug metabolism: identification of the cytochrome P450 enzymes catalysing 4-hydroxyantipyrine, 3-hydroxyantipyrine, and norantipyrine formation. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 59: 613–623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fabris L., Jemmolo R.M., Toffolo G., et al. (1999): The monoethylglycinexylidide test for grading of liver cirrhosis. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther., 13: 67–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalow W. (1987): Genetic variation in the human cytochrome P-450 system. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 31: 633–641.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Howden C.W., Birnie G.G. and Brodie M.J. (1989): Drug metabolism in liver disease. Pharmacol. Ther., 40: 439–474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wojcicki J., Drozdzik M., Gawronska-Szklarz Z. and Dadej R. (1994): Lidocaine test patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. Probl. Ter. Monit., 5: 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang Y-S., Lee S-D., Deng J-F., et al. (1993): Measuring lidocaine metabolite monoethylglycinexylidide as a quantitative index of hepatic function with chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. J. Hepatol., 19: 140–147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ercolani G., Grazi G.L., Calliva R., et al. (2000): The lidocaine (MEGX) test as an index of hepatic function: its clinical usefulness in liver surgery. Surgery, 127: 464–471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Potter J.M., Hickman P.E., Henderson A., Balderson G.A., Lynch S.V. and Strong R.W. (1996): The use of lidocaine-monoethyllglycinexylidide test in the liver transplant recipient. Ther. Drug Monit., 18: 383–387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer-Wyss B., Renner E., Luo H. and Scholer A. (1993): Assessment of lidocaine metabolite formation in comprison with other quantitative liver function tests. J. Hepatol., 19: 133–139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Danhof M. and Teunissen M.W. (1984): Antipyrine as a model drug to assess oxydative drug metabolising activity in man. Pharm. Internat. J., 5: 11–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Moltke L.L., Abernethy D.R., Kaplan M.M. and Greenblatt D.J. (1993): Antipyrine kinetics in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 33: 75–77.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wensing G., Hoffmann K. and Heidemann HT. Antipyrine elimination in patients with alcoholic and non-alcoholic cirrhosis. Z. Gastroenterol., 31: 15–19.

  25. Grieco A., Castellano R., Matera A., et al. (1998): Antipyrine clearance in chronic and neoplastic liver disease: a study of 518 patients. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 13: 460–466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wojcicki, J., Kozlowski, K., Drozdzik, M. et al. Comparison of MEGX (monoethylglycinexylidide) and antipyrine tests in patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 27, 243–247 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192334

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192334

Keywords

Navigation