Skip to main content
Log in

Deoxynivalenol in commercial beer — screening for the toxin with an indirect competitive ELISA

  • Published:
Mycotoxin Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Antibodies specific for deoxynivalenol (DON) were prepared by immunizing rabbits with a deoxynivalenol-hemiglutaryl-HSA conjugate. The antibody showed cross-reactivity with DON, 15a-acetyl-DON (15-Ac DON), and 3a-acotyl-DON (3-Ac DON) of 100%, 216%, and 260%, respectively. No cross-reactivity was observed against 20 further trichothecenes of the A-, B-, and C-type. An indirect competitive ELISA procedure was set up for the detection of DON in liquid matrices occurring in the brewing process, Including beer. ELISA was sensitive down to 3.8 ng/mL. Detection limit for DON in tenfold diluted beer was 50 ppb. Recovery of the toxin in spiked beer was 45%, 77%, and 83% at toxin levels of 50; 500; and 1,000 ppb, respectively. ELISA results corresponded quite well with HPLC data. 196 commercial beers from several German breweries, including 36 gushing-positive samples, were assayed for DON. Screening revealed toxin levels from not detectable to 569 ppb. 69% of the gushing beers had marked levels of DON. 37% of the gushing-negative beer samples contained DON in detectable amounts with a maximum content of 172 ppb. Wheat beers had significantly higher DON-contents than beers derived from barley. Concentration of the toxin was significantly higher in gushing beers than in nongushing beers from both cereal sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amaha M, Kitabatake K (1981) Gushing in beer.In: Pollock JRA (Ed) Brewing science Vol 2, Academic Press, London, pp 457–489

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gjertsen P, Trolle B, Anderson K (1963) Wheatered barley as a contributory cause of gushing in beer.In: Proc EBC Congr, Brussels. pp 320–341

  3. Prentice N, Sloey W (1960) Studies on barley microflora of possible importance to malting and brewing quality. I. The treatment of barley during malting with selected microorganisms. Proc Am Soc Brew Chem. pp 28–33

  4. Gyllang H, Sätmark L, Martinson E (1977) The influence of some fungi on malt quality. Proc EBC Congr, Amsterdam, pp 251–258

  5. Guggenberger J (1962) Über den Mechanismus des Wildwerdens von Bier. Proc EBC Congr, Brussels. pp 299–317

  6. Gardner RJ (1973) The mechanisms of gushing — A review. J Inst Brew 79:275–283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Amaha M Kitabatake K, Nakagawa A, Yoshida J, Harada T (1973) Gushing inducers produced by some mould strains. Proc EBC Congr, Salzburg, pp 381–398

  8. Kitabatake K (1978) A wort component responsible for gushing in beer. Bull Brew Sci. 24:21–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gjertsen P, Trolle B, Anderson K (1965) Studies on gushing. II Gushing caused by microorganisms, speciallyFusarium species. Proc EBC Congr, Stockholm, pp 428–438

  10. Haikara A (1980) Gushing induced by fungi.In: European Brewery Convention, Monograph VI — Relationships between malt and beer. EBC. pp 251–258

  11. Haikara A (1983) Malt and beer from barley artificially contaminated withFusarium in the field. Proc EBC Congr, London, pp 401–408

  12. Niessen L, Donhauser S, Weideneder A, Geiger E, Vogel H (1992) Mykologische Untersuchungen an Cerealien und Malzen im Zusammenhang mit dem Wildwerden (Gushing) des Bieres. Brauwelt 132:702–714

    Google Scholar 

  13. Payen J, Girard T, Gaillardin M, Lafont P (1983) Sur la présence de mycotoxines dans des bières. Microbio Alim Nutr 1:143–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Trucksess MW, Flood MT, Page SW (1986) Thin layer chromatographic determination of deoxynivalenol in processed grain products. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 69:35–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Woller R, Majerus P (1982) Zur Mykotoxin- und insbesondere Aflatoxinsituation bei Bier, Ausgangsstoffen und Nebenprodukten der Bierbereitung. Monatsschr Brauwiss 35:88–90

    Google Scholar 

  16. Majerus P, Woller R (1983) Zur Mykotoxin-Situation bei Bier. 2. Mitteilung: Ochratoxin A und Citrinin. Monatsschr Brauwiss 36:335–336

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vecchio A, Finoli C, Peccedi M, Cerrutti G (1985) Sull’origine e la presenza di micotossine nella birra. Technol Alim 8:84–87

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cerrutti G, Vecchio A, Finoli C, Trezzi A (1987) Indices of quality enza di micotossine nella birra. Monatsschr Brauwiss 40:455–457

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tressl R, Hommel E, Helak B (1989) Bestimmung von Ochratoxin A in Gerste, Malz und Bier durch Hochdruckflüssigkeitschromato-graphie/Fluoreszenzdetektion. Monatsschr Brauwiss 42:331–335

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fukal L, Prosek J, Rakosova A (1990) Radiochemische Aflatoxin-bestimmung in Gerste, Malz und Bier. Monatsschr Brauwiss 43:212–215

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lepschy-von Gleissenthall J, Dietrich R, Märtlbauer E, Schuster M, Süß A, Terplan G (1989) A survey on the occurrence ofFusarium

  22. Lepschy-von Gleissenthall J (1992) Analytik und Vorkommen von Deoxynivalenol. 14. Mykotoxin-Workshop, Gießen, 26.05.1992

  23. Niessen L, Vogel H, Donhauser S (1993) Fate of deoxynivalenol (DON) in the brewing process. Monatsschr Brauwiss (in preparation)

  24. Kamimura H, Nishijima M, Saito K, Yasuda K, Ibe A, Nagayama T, Ushiyama H, Naoi Y (1979) The decomposition of trichothecene mycotoxins during food processing (Studies on mycotoxins in foods. XII). J Food Hyg Soc Jpn 20:352–357

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Scott PM, Kanhere SR, Daley EF, Farber JM (1992) Fermentation of wort containing deoxynivalenol and zearalenone. Mycotox Res 8:58–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Casale WL, Pestka JJ, Hart LP (1988) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay employing monoclonal antibody specific for deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) and several analogues. J Agric Food Chem 36:663 -668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bauminger S, Wilchek M (1980) The use of carbodiimides in the preparation of immunizing conjugates. Meth Enzymol 70:151–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Subba Rao PV, McCartney-Francis NL, Metcalfe DD (1983) An avidin-biotin micro-ELISA for rapid measurement of total allergen-specific human IgG. J Immunol Methods 57:71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lauren DR, Greenhalgh R (1987) Simultaneous analysis of nivalenol and deoxynivalenol in cereals by liquid chromatography. J Asoc Off Anal Chem 70:479–483

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tanaka T, Hasegawa A, Yamamoto S, Lee U-S, Sjgiura Y, Ueno Y (1988) World wide contamination of cereals byFusarium mycotoxins nivalenol, deoxynivalenol, and zearalenone. 1. Survey of 19 countries. J Agric Food Chem 36:979–983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Donhauser S, Weideneder A, Winnewisser W, Geiger E (1989) Beurteilung von Malz als Ursache der Gushingneigung von Bier. Brauwelt 129:1658–1662

    Google Scholar 

  32. Niessen L (1993) Entwicklung und Anwendung immunchemischer Verfahren zum Nachweis wichtiger Fusarium-Toxine bei der Bierbereitung sowie mykologische Untersuchungen im Zusammenhang mit dem Wildwerden (Gushing) von Bieren. München, Technische Universität, Diss

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niessen, L., Böhm-Schrami, M., Vogel, H. et al. Deoxynivalenol in commercial beer — screening for the toxin with an indirect competitive ELISA. Mycotox Res 9, 99–109 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192241

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192241

Keywords

Navigation