Skip to main content
Log in

Contexts for writing, writing in context

  • Writing in Context, Contexts of Writing
  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of context variables is emphasized in recent research on writing, from which a great variety of meanings of the word ‘context’ emerges. The aim of this paper is to investigate some aspects of the identification of context variables in writing research by focusing on three main functions of context:

  1. a)

    context as a condition for communication, i.e. the ground the writer creates in order to communicate with the reader

  2. b)

    context as task environment, i.e. the situational variables (task objectives, motivational aspects, media, etc.) which can influence the writing process and/or product

  3. c)

    context as an interactive framework, i.e. context as constituted by what people are doing, as well as by when and where they are doing it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brandt, D. (1986). Toward an understanding of context in composition. Written Communication, 3, 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D. (1979). Human cognition. Baltimore: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridwell-Bowles, L., Johnson, P., & Brehe, S. (1987). Composing and computers: Case studies of experienced writers. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., & Glynn, S. M. (Eds.) (1989) Computer writing environment. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronckart, J.-P. (1985). Le fonctionnement des discours. Neuchâtel: Delachaux & Niestlé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (1981). Context for comprehension. In J. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9), (pp. 313–330). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowhurst, M., & Piché, G. (1979). Audience and mode of discourse effects on syntactic complexity in writing at two grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daiute, C. (1985). Writing and computers. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayol, M. (1985). Le récit et sa construction. Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, S. W. (1987). Response to student writing. Urbana: N.C.T.E.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, C. (1989). How the writing medium shapes the writing process: Effects of word processing on planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 181–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, C., & Hayes, J. R. (1986). What did I just say? Reading problems in writing with the machine. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 22–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1987). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language, (pp. 55–82). S. Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing, (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawisher, G. E. (1987). The effects of word processing on the revision strategies of college freshmen. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heap, J. L. (1989). Collaborative practices during word processing in a first grade classroom. In C. Emihovic (Ed.), Locating learning: Ethnographic perspectives on classroom research, (pp. 263–288). Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildyard, A., & Olson, D. R. (1982). On the comprehension and memory of oral vs. written discourse. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy, (pp. 9–33). Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. R., & Nead, J. M. (1983). General contextualism, ecological sciences and cognitive research. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4, 507–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (1982). Culture and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence, (pp. 642–719). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (1983). Culture and cognitive development. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (vol. 3), (pp. 295–356), New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & De La Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition, (pp. 67–94). Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lurija, A. R. (1978). The development of writing in the child. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language (pp. 237–277). Chichester Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J. (1983). A contextualist theory of knowledge: Its implication for innovation and reform in psychological research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 16), (pp. 1–47). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrand, M. (1986). The structure of written communication. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrand, M. (1987). The role of context in written communication. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language, (pp. 197–214). S. Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrand, M. (1989). A social-interactive model of writing. Written Communication, 6, 66–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R., & Hildyard, A. (1983). Writing and literal meaning. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language, (pp. 41–65). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. D., & Kurland, D. M. (1987). Cognitive technologies for writing. In E. Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education, (Vol. 14) (pp. 277–326). Washington, DC.: A.E.R.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, C. L. (1987). Identifying context variables in research on writing. Written Communication, 4, 107–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafoth, B. A., & Rubin, D. L. (Eds.) (1988). The social construction of written communication. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (1990). Literacy in school and out. Daedalus, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B., & Lave, J. (Eds.) (1984). Everyday cognition. Cambridge & London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. L. (1988). Introduction: Four dimensions of social construction in written communication. In B. A. Rafoth & D. L. Rubin (Eds.), The social construction of written communication, (pp. 1–33). Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scinto, L. F. M. (1986). Written language and psychological development. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B., & Lansman, M. (1989). A cognitive basis for a computer writing environment. In B. K. Britton & S. M. Glynn (Eds.), Computer writing environment, (pp. 17–56). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. (1983). Literacy and language: Relationships during the preschool years. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 165–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien, G. (1986). Context and cognition: Introduction. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 6, 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, M. M., & Pence, P. (1989). Word processing and student writers. In B. K. Britton & S. M. Glynn (Eds.), Computer writing environment, (pp. 93–127). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The preparation of this paper has been supported by a grant from the National Council of Research. Grant n. CT 88.00964.08.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boscolo, P. Contexts for writing, writing in context. Eur J Psychol Educ 6, 167–174 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03191935

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03191935

Key words

Navigation