Skip to main content
Log in

How writers integrate information in written text production: a developmental study

  • Identifying Writing Processes
  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this work is to study the acquisition and development of the ability to co-ordinate information in a written text. Fourth, 6th and 8th graders and undergraduates were assigned two conditions: they were presented with either two prose passages, describing two different peoples, or only one passage giving out the same information in a single text. The subjects read the passages and had to produce a text containing the comparison between the two peoples.

The analysis of the texts produced by the subjects evidenced six different information integration levels.

Two dependent variables were used:

  1. a)

    the highest level present in each protocol

  2. b)

    the percentage of level presence in each protocol.

For both variables, data show a developmental trend: older subjects tend to use more complex levels. In the older subjects the highest and the most frequent levels coincide in most cases; in the other age groups a differentiation between these two variables is observed. The two conditions produce different results: subjects perform better when presented with the single text. Moreover the use of the levels in the two conditions depends on and interacts with age. The younger subjects are more sensitive to the difficulty degree of the task and, as age increases, the two tasks give rise to performances more similar to one another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bereiter, C., Burtis, P. J., & Scardamalia, M. (1988). Cognitive operations in constructing main points in written composition, Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1982). From conversation to composition: The role of instruction in a developmental process. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology, (Vol. 2), (pp. 1–64), Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C., & Matsuhashi, A. (1983). Theory of writing process. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language, (pp. 3–39). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). Plans that guide the composing process. In C.H. Frederiksen & J. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication, (Vol. 2), (pp. 39–58). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1980) Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach. (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J. R. (1979). Coherence and Coreference. Cognitive Science, 3, 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1985). Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective, Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 61–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, J. A. (1986). Children reading and writing. Structures and strategies. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levorato, M.C., & De Bernardi, B. (1987). La scrittura come processo di elaborazione delle informazioni. Ricerche di Psicologia, 4, 73–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., & Perfetti, C. A. (1982). Coherence and connectedness in the development of discourse production, Text, 2, 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia M. (1981) How children cope with the cognitive demand of writing. In C. H. Frederiksen & J. F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development and teaching of written communication. (pp. 81–103). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, G. (1985). Fostering the development of self-regulation in children’s knowledge processing. In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills, (Vol. 2), (pp. 563–577). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. & Paris, P. (1985). The function of explicit discourse. knowledge in the development of text, representations and composing strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scinto, L. F. M. (1983). The development of text production. In J. Fine & R. O. Freedle (Eds.), Developmental issues in discourse. (pp. 225–268). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scinto, L. F. M. (1986). Written language and psychological development. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research has been financed by a grant of the Education Ministry of the Italian Gouvernement, out of founds expecially devoted to research work of national interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Bernardi, B., Levorato, M.C. How writers integrate information in written text production: a developmental study. Eur J Psychol Educ 6, 143–153 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03191933

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03191933

Key words

Navigation