Iconographia mycologica

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp N67–N120 | Cite as

Ascomycetes

Article

Ref.

  1. Dennis, R. W. G. (1968)—British Ascomycetes. Lehre, 1968.Google Scholar

Ref.

  1. King, D. S. &Jong, S. C. (1975)—Sarcinosporon: a new genus to accommodateTrichosporon inkin andPrototheca filamentosa. Mycotaxon 3: 89–97.Google Scholar

Ref.

  1. Locquin-Linard, M. (1975)—Faurelina, nouveau genre d’Ascomycètes (Chaudefaudiellaceae?). Rev. de Mycol. 39: 125–129.Google Scholar

Ref.

  1. Apinis, A. E. &Clark, B. M. (1974)—Neoxenophila foetida gen. et sp. nov., a new Keratinophilic ascomycete. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc., 63: 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ref.

  1. Stevens, F. I. (1925)—Hawaiian Fungi. Bernice P. Bishop Museum. Bull. no. 19.Google Scholar
  2. Müller, E. & von Arx, J. A. (1962)—Die Gattungen der didymosporen Pyrenomyceten. Beitr. z. Kryptogamenflora d. Schweiz. Wabern-Bern, 1962.Google Scholar

Ref.

  1. Samson, R. A. &Mouchacca, J. (1975)—Two new soil-borne cleistothecial ascomycetes. Can. J. Bot., 53: 1634–1639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ref.

  1. Das, A. C. (1962)—New species ofThielavia andSordaria. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc., 45: 545–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. von Arx, J. A. (1975)—OnThielavia angulata and some recently describedThielavia species. Kavaka 3: 33–36.Google Scholar

Ref.

  1. Malloch, D. (1973)—The genusThielavia. Mycologia, 69: 1055–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Booth, C. (1961)—Studies of Pyrenomycetes: VI:Thielavia, with notes on some allied genera. Mycol. Papers no. 83.Google Scholar
  3. von Arx, J. A. (1975)—OnThielavia and some similar genera of Ascomycetes. Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn. Studies in Mycology, no. 8.Google Scholar

Ref.

  1. von Arx, J. A. (1975)—OnThielavia and some similar genera of Ascomycetes. Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn. Studies in Mycology, no. 8.Google Scholar

Ref.

  1. Samson, R. A. &Mouchacca, J. (1975)—Two new soil-borne cleistothecial ascomycetes. Can. J. Bot., 53: 1634–1639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ref.

  1. Schmidt, I. (1969)—Naturschutz Mecklenburg, 7: 11–14.Google Scholar

Ref.

  1. Speer, O. (1975)—Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Systematik der Erysiphaceen. I. Die GattungBlumeria Golovin und ihre Typus artErysiphe graminis Dc. Sydowia, 27: 1–6.Google Scholar

Ref.

  1. Müller & v. Arx (1962)—Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz. Die Gattungen der didymosporen Pyrenomyceten. Bern.Google Scholar

Ref.

  1. von Arx, J. A. & Müller, E. (1954)—Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz: Die Gattungen der amerosporer. Pyrenomyceten. Band 11, Heft 1.Google Scholar

Ref.

  1. Müller, E. & von Arx, J. A. (1962)—Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz: Die Gattungen der Didymosporen Pyrenomyceten: Band 11, Heft 2.Google Scholar

Ref.

  1. Ullasa, B. A. &Rao, V. G. (1973)—Deshpandiella, a new genus of theDiaporthaceae. Bull. of the Torrey Botanical Club, 100: 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ref.

  1. Olchowecki, A. &Reid, J. (1974)—Taxonomy of the genusCeratocystis in Manitoba. Can. J. Bot., 52: 1675–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Upadhyay, H. P. &Kendrick, W. B. (1975)—Prodromus for a revision ofCeratocystis (Microascales, Ascomycetes) and its conidial states. Mycologia, 67: 798–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ref.

  1. Barr, E. M. (1976)—Hypoxylon grandineum: a Loculoascomycete. Mycotaxon 3: 325–329.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1977

Personalised recommendations