Skip to main content
Log in

A collective goods model of pluralist political systems

  • Articles
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bentley, A.F.The Process of Government. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, J.R. ‘Provision of Collective Goods as a Function of Group Size.’American Political Science Review 48, 1974, pp. 707–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, J.R. ‘A Diagrammatic Exposition of the Logic of Collective Action.’Public Choice 26, 1976, pp. 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frolich, N., J. Oppenheimer and O. Young.Political Leadership and Collective Goods. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, E.The Group Bases of Politics. Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University Press, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M. ‘Group Size, Group Homogeneity, and the Aggregate Provision of a Pure Public Good under Cournot Behavior.’Public Choice 18, 1974, pp. 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M.The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, D.B.The Governmental Process. New York, Alfred E. Knopf, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. ‘The Cost of Transfers.’Kyklos 24, 1971, pp. 629–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. ‘Pressure Groups and Political Entrepreneurs: A Review Article.’Papers on Non-Market Decision Making 1, 1966, pp. 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research support of the Institute of Public Policy Studies is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chamberlin, J.R. A collective goods model of pluralist political systems. Public Choice 33, 97–113 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03187598

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03187598

Keywords

Navigation