References
Black, D.The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1958.
Bowen, H.R. ‘The Interpretation of Voting in the Allocation of Economic Resources.’Quarterly Journal of Economics (November), 1943.
Breton, A., and R. Wintrobe. ‘The Equilibrium Size of a Budget-Maximizing Bureau: A Note on Niskanen’s Theory of Bureaucracy.’Journal of Political Economy (February), 1975.
Edwards, F.R. ‘Managerial Objectives in Regulated Industries: Expense-Preference Behavior in Banking.’Journal of Political Economy (February), 1977.
Holcombe, R.G.A Public Choice Analysis of Millage Issue Elections for Financing Public Schools. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (1975).
Inman, R.P. ‘Testing Political Economy’s “As If” Proposition: Is the Median Voter Really Decisive?’.Public Choice (Summer), 1978.
Margolis, J. ‘Comment [on Niskanen].’Journal of Law and Economics (December), 1975.
Niskanen, W.Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago, Aldine-Atherton, 1971.
Niskanen, W. ‘Bureaucrats and Politicians.’Journal of Law and Economics (December), 1975.
Riker, W., and P. Ordeshook.An Introduction to Positive Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Financial support was provided, in part, by The Spencer Foundation. We thank M. Harris, J. Lave, S. Salop, and participants in workshops at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve and at Queen’s University for helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Romer, T., Rosenthal, H. Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo. Public Choice 33, 27–43 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03187594
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03187594