Skip to main content
Log in

Bone mineral density of the hip measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal elderly women and in patients with hip fracture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in 133 normal females on five regions of the femoral site: neck, trochanteric, intertrochanteric, Ward’s triangle, and total area of the proximal femur. One hundred and twenty-five women (56 older than 65, range 65–97, and 69 with an age range of 21–65) were also examined for spinal bone mineral density. The mean in vivo precision (CV%) of the measurements with respositioning assessed on five young and eight elderly patients was ranged from 0.7% to 1.7% but lowerfor Ward’s triangle (CV=2.95% and 3.87%). Between 30 and 90 years, a linear age-related bone mineral decrease was found at all sites with a similar magnitude of bone loss for the femoral neck, total or intertrochanteric regions (−33% to −39%). A greater decrease was found for the Ward’s triangle region (−61 %). In the subgroup of elderly women (65–97 years old), the lumbar BMD measured with an anteroposterior incidence did not decrease significantly with age, contrasting with an average 27% decrease of the BMD of the hip between 65 and 90 years of age.

In addition, 31 patients suffering either from a cervical (n=12) or pertrochanteric (n=19) fracture were measured on their contralateral. femur 15 to 30 days after the fracture event. The mean calculated BMD values were, depending on the measured area, from 14% to 21% lower than those reported for age-matched controls (z-score from −1.11 to −0.65). A fracture threshold was determined for each site from this population and the elderly controls. The best discrimination between patients and controls was obtained at the femoral neck site, with a value of 0.57 g/cm2 providing a specificity of 69% with a sensitivity of 75%.

In conclusion, bone mineral content of the proximal femur can be measured with an acceptable precision by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. In elderly people, this site appears more suitable than the lumbar spine for the detection of age-related bone loss. Bone mineral density appears to be one major determinant in the causation of hip fracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melton LJ III. Epidemiology of fractures. In: Riggs BL, Melton LJ III, eds. Osteoporosis: etiology, diagnosis and management. New York: Raven Press, 1988; 133–54.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Melton LJ III, Wahner HW, Richelson LS. Osteoporosis and the risks of fracture. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 124:254–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallagher JC, Melton LJ III, Riggs BL, Bergstrath E. Epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur in Rochester, Minnesota. Clin Orthop 1980; 150:163–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ross, PD, Wasnich RD. Vogel JM. Detection of prefracture spinal osteoporosis using bone mineral absortiometry. J Bone Miner Res 1988; 3:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hansson T, Roos B. Age change in the bone mineral of the lumbar spine in normal women. Calcif Tissue tnt 1986; 38:249–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Braillon P, Duboeuf F, Meary MF, Barret P, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ. Mesure du contenu minéral osseux par radiographic digitale quantitative: Premiers résultats au niveau lombaire. Presse Med 1989; 18:1062–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelly TL, Slovik DM, Schoenfeld DA, Neer RM. Quantitative digital radiography versus dual-photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988; 67:839–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sartoris DJ, Resnick D. Current and innovative methods for non-invasive bone densitometry. Orthopedics 1990; 28:257–78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pouilles JM, Bernard J, Tremolliére F, Louvet JP, Ribot C. Femoral bone density in young male adults with stress fracture. Bone 1989; 10:105–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mazess RB, Wahner MW. Nuclear medicine and densitometry. In: Riggs LB, Melton LJ, III, eds. Osteoporosis; etiology, diagnosis and management. New York: Raven Press 1988:145

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wahner HW. Non-invasive measurement of bone loss in the femoral neck. In: Kleerekoper M, Krane SM, eds. Clinical disorders of bone and mineral metabolism. New York: Liebert 1989: 237–46.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McClung MR. Roberts IA. Comparison of precision performance with dual-energy X-ray absorptimetry. Seventh International Workshop on bone densitometry, Rancho Mirage, California, 1989; 140 (abstract).

  13. Gluer CC, Steiger P, Selvidge R, Elliesen-Kliefoth K, Hayashi C, Genant HK. Comparative assessment of dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy radiography. Radiology 1990; 174:223–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Borders J, Kerr E, Sartoris DJ. Quantitative dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: In vivo comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry. Radiology 1989; 170:129–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Slosman DO, Rizzoli R, Buchs B, Piana F, Donath A, Bonjour JP, Comparative study of the performance of X-ray and gadolinium 153 bone densitometers at the level of the spine, femoral neck and femoral shaft. Eur J Nucl Med 1990; 17:3–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Seeman E. et al. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging: Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndrome. J Clin Invest 1982; 70:716–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaadt O, Bohr H. Different trends of age-related diminution of bone mineral content in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and femoral shaft in women. Calcif Tissue tnt 1988; 42:71–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pocock NA, Eisman JA, Mazess RB, Sambrook PN, Yeates MG, Freund J. Bone mineral density in Australia compared to the United States. J Bone Miner Res 1988; 3:601–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sartoris JD, Sommer FG, Marcus R, Madvig P. Bone mineral density in the femoral neck: quantitative assessment using dual-energy projection radiography. AJR 1985; 144:605–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hedlund LR, Gallagher JC. The effect of age and menopause on bone mineral density of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res 1989; 4:639–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Norimatsu H, Mori S, Uesato T, Yoshikawa T, Katsuyama N. Bone mineral density of the spine and proximal femur in normal and osteoporotic subjects in Japan. Bone Miner 1989; 5:213–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Uebelhart D, Duboeuf F, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD. Lateral dual-photon absorptiometry: a new technique to measure the cancel-lous bone mineral density of the lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 1990; 5:525–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner WS. Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. JAMA 1990; 263:665–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazess RB, Peppler WW, Chesney RW, Lang TA, Lindgren U, Smith E. Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? J Nucl Med 1984; 25:281–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barden WS, Mazess RB. Bone densitometry of the appendicular and axial skeleton. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1989; 4:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Eastell R, Wahner HW, O’Fallen WM, Amadio PC, Melton LJ III, Riggs BL. Unequal decrease in bone density of lumbar spine and ultradistal radius in Colles’ and vertebral fracture syndromes. J Clin Invest 1989; 83:168–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mazess RB, Barden H, Ettinger M, Schultz E. Bone density of the radius, spine, and proximal femur in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1988; 3:13–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wasnich RD, Ross PD, Davis JW, Vogel JM. A comparison of single and multi-site BMC measurements for assessment of spine fracture probability. J Nucl Med 1989; 30:1166–71

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nilas L, Podenphant J, Riis JR, Gotfredsen A, Christiansen C. Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm, J. Nucl Med 1987; 28:960–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Need AG, Nordin BEC. Which bone to measure? Osteoporosis Int 1990; 1:3–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC. A hypothesis: the causes of hip fractures. J Gerontol 1989; 44:M107–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duboeuf, F., Braillon, P., Chapuy, M.C. et al. Bone mineral density of the hip measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal elderly women and in patients with hip fracture. Osteoporosis Int 1, 242–249 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03187468

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03187468

Keywords

Navigation