Skip to main content

The development of policy approaches for reducing nitrogen pollution to coastal waters of the USA


Two-thirds of the coastal rivers and bays in the United States are degraded from nutrient pollution, and nitrogen inputs these waters continue to increase. The nitrogen comes from a variety of sources, including runoff from agricultural fields, concentrated animal feeding operations, atmospheric deposition from fossil fuel combustion, and sewage and septic wastes. Technical solutions for nitrogen pollution exist at reasonable cost. That most of these solutions have not yet been implemented to any significant extent across the United States suggests that new policy approaches are necessary. The best solution may involve a combination of voluntary and mandatory approaches, applying different approaches to different sources of nitrogen pollution. A watershed-based approach that relies heavily on voluntary mechanisms (such as crop-yield insurance to reduce over-fertilization) is likely to be the most effective for some sources of nitrogen (such as runoff from agricultural fields), while a uniform national regulatory approach may be better for others (such as NOx emissions from fossil fuel combustion). Implementation of management strategies should be carefully coupled to monitoring programs to assess the effectiveness of these strategies. While both nitrogen and phosphorus are important to control, the focus should be on nitrogen management, in part because nitrogen is more generally the causal agent of coastal eutrophication. Also, while nitrogen-control practices tend to also reduce phosphorus pollution, phosphorus-control practices often have little effect on nitrogen. Although current scientific and technical knowledge is sufficient to begin to make substantial progress toward solving coastal nitrogen pollution, progress will be made more quickly and more cost effectively with increased investment in appropriate scientific research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    Bricker, S. B., Clement, C. G., Pirhalla, D. E., et al., National Estuarine Eutrophication Assessment: A Summary of Conditions, Historical Trends, and Future Outlook. Silver Springs: National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    EPA, National Coastal Condition Report, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001, EPA-620/R-01/005.

  3. 3.

    NRC, Clean Coastal Waters: Understanding and Reducing the Effects of Nutrient Pollution, Washington: National Academy Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Howarth, R. W., Anderson, D., Cloern, J. et al., Nutrient pollution of coastal rivers, bays, and seas, Issues in Ecology, 2000, 7: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Boesch, D. F., Burroughs, R. H., Baker, J. E., et al., Marine Pollution in the United States: Significant Accomplishments, Future Challenges, Arlington: Pew Oceans Commission, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Nixon, S. W., Coastal marine eutrophication: A definition, social causes, and future concerns, Ophelia, 1995, 41: 199–219.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ryther, J. H., Dunstan, W. M., Nitrogen, phosphorus, and eutrophication in the coastal marine environment, Science, 1971, 171: 1008–1012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Melillo, J. M., Cowling, E. B., Reactive nitrogen and public policies for environmental protection, Ambio, 2002, 31: 150–158.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    NRC, Managing Wastewater in Coastal Urban Areas, Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Howarth, R. W., Boyer, E., Pabich, W. et al., Nitrogen use in the United States from 1961 to 1997 with some future projections, Ambio, 2002, 31: 88–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jaworksi, N. A., Howarth, R. W., Hetling, L. J., Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen oxides onto the landscape contributes to coastal eutrophication in the Northeast US, Environmental Science & Technology, 1997, 31: 1995–2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Goolsby, D. A., Battaglin, W. A., Lawrence, G. B. et al., Flux and sources of nutrients in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin; Topic 3. Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico, Silver Spring: NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series, 1999, No. 17.

  13. 13.

    Goolsby, D. A., Battaglin, W. A., Long-term changes in concentrations and flux of nitrogen in the Mississippi River basin, USA, Hydrological Processes, 2001, 15: 1209–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    McIsaac, G. F., David, M. B., Gertner, G. Z., Eutrophication: Nitrate flux in the Mississippi River, Nature, 2001, 414: 166–167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Howarth, R. W., Billen, G., Swaney, D., Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N & P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences, Biogeochemistry, 1996, 35: 75–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Howarth, R. W., Walker, D., Sharpley, A., Sources of nitrogen pollution to coastal waters of the United States, Estuaries, 2002, 25: 656–676.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chesapeake Bay Executive Council, Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Annapolis, 1987.

  18. 18.

    Chesapeake Bay Executive Council, Chesapeake 2000 Agreement, Annapolis, 2000.

  19. 19.

    Chesapeake Bay Executive Council, Chesapeake Bay Nutrient and Sediment Cap Load Allocation Document (draft), Annapolis, 2004.

  20. 20.

    Boesch, D. F., Brinsfield, R. B., Magnien, R. E., Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: Scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture, J. Envion. Qual., 2001, 30: 303–320.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Boesch, D. F., Reversing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal waters: Challenges and opportunities for science, Estuaries, 2002, 25: 744–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rabalais, N. N., Turner, R. E., Scavia, D., Beyond science into policy: Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and the Mississippi River, Bio-Science, 2002, 52: 129–142

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Committee on Environment and Natural Resources (CENR), Integrated Assessment of Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico, Washington DC: National Science and Technology Council, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Boyer, Ed W., Goodale, C. L., Jaworski, N. A. et al., Anthropogenic nitrogen sources and relationships to riverine nitrogen export in the northeastern USA, Biogeochemistry, 2002, 57/58: 137–169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Valiela, I., Geist, M., McClelland, J. et al., Nitrogen loading frm watersheds to estuaries: Verification of the Waquoit Bay nitrogen loading model, Biogeochemistry, 2000, 49: 277–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Conley, D. J., Biogeochemical nutrient cycles and nutrient management strategies, Hydrobiologia, 2000, 41: 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    NRC, Soil and Water Quality: An Agenda for Agriculture, Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Randall, G. W., Mulla, D. J., Nitrate nitrogen in surface waters as influence by climatic conditions and agricultural practices, J. Environ. Qual., 2001, 30: 337–344.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mitsch, W. J., Day, J., Gilliam, J. W. et al., Reducing Nutrient Loads, Escpecially Nitrate-Nitrogen, to Surface Water, Ground Water, and the Gulf of Mexico, Topic 5. Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico, Silver Spring: NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series, 1999, No. 19.

  30. 30.

    Randall, G. W., Huggins, D. R., Russelle, M. P. et al., Nitrate losses through subsurface tile drainage in CRP, alfalfa, and row crop systems, J. Environ. Qual., 1997, 26: 1240–1247.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Staver, K. W., Brinsfield, R. B., Use of cereal grain winter cover crops to reduce groundwater nitrate contamination in the Mid-Atlantic coastal plain, J. Soil Water Conserv, 1998, 53: 230–240.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mitsch, W. J., Day, J., Gilliam, J. W., Groffman, P. M. et al., Reducing nitrogen loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River basin: Strategies to counter a persistent ecological problem, BioScience, 2001, 51: 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Vitousek, P. M., Aber, J. D., Howarth, R. W. et al., Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: Sources and consequences, Ecological Applications, 1997, 7: 737–750.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Choi, E., Yun, Z., in Proceedings of the Strong N and Agro 2003, IWA Specialty Symposium on Strong Nitrogenous and Agro-Wastewater, June 11–13, 2003, Seoul, Korea, 2003, 1, 118.

  35. 35.

    EPA, National Air Pollutant Emission Trends 1900–1998, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-454/R-00-002., 2000.

  36. 36.

    Mosier, A. R., Bleken, M. A., Chaiwanakupt, P. et al., Policy implications of human-accelerated nitrogen cycling, Biogeochemistry, 2001, 52: 281–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Moomaw, W., Energy, industry, and nitrogen: Strategies for decreasing reactive nitrogen emissions, Ambio, 2002, 31: 184–189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Holland, E. A., Dentener, F. J., Braswell, B. H. et al., Contemporary and pre-industrial global reactive nitrogen budgets, Biogeochemistry, 1999, 46: 7–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    DEP, New York City 2000 Regional Harbor Survey, New York: New York City Department of Environmental Protection, 2001.

  40. 40.

    Novotny, V., Imhoff, K. R., Olthof, M. et al., Karl Imhoff’s Handbook of Urban Drainage and Wastewater Disposal, New York: Wiley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Peterson, B. J., Wollheim, W. M., Mulholland, P. J. et al., Control of nitrogen exports from watersheds by headwater streams, Science, 2001, 292: 86–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    EPA, Nutrient Criteria Technical Guidance Manual for Estuarine and Coastal Marine Waters, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-822-B-01-003, 2001.

  43. 43.

    Howarth, R. W., Marino, R., Scavia, D., Priority Topics for Nutrient Pollution in Coastal Waters: An Integrated National Research Program for the United States, Silver Spring: NOAA National Ocean Service, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    US Commission on Ocean Policy, Final report posted to web site on September 20, 2004;

  45. 45.

    Powell, J. Programs that reduce nutrient polluton in coastal waters, Unpublished report to the Pew Oceans Commission, 2001.

  46. 46.

    NRC, Assessing the Total Maximum Daily Load Approach to Water Quality Management, Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Doughty, R. S., Water quality trading between point and nonpoint sources: The importance of enforcement, Cornell University: MS thesis, 2003.

  48. 48.

    EPA, Market-based Approaches to Improve the Nations Waters (Draft), U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, 2001.

  49. 49.

    EPA, Final Water Quality Trading Policy, Fed. Reg., 68: 1608–01.

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howarth, R.W. The development of policy approaches for reducing nitrogen pollution to coastal waters of the USA. Sci. China Ser. C.-Life Sci. 48, 791–806 (2005).

Download citation


  • development of policy approaches
  • reducing nitrogen pollution
  • coastal water of the USA