Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships between judgements of the complexity, pleasingness and interestingness of music

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forty unfamiliar, one-minute samples of modern jazz were rated by 132 undergraduates for judged complexity, pleasingness and interestingness, in a between-subjects design. Pleasingness and interestingness were positively correlated and both were decreasing linear functions of complexity, although the correlation between interestingness and complexity was low and only marginally significant. It appears that pleasingness acts as a suppressor on the interestingness/complexity correlation: with pleasingness partialled out the correlation was positive and highly significant. Partialling had only small effects on the other correlations. Results suggest that techniques used previously to study non-musical stimuli may also be applicable to music.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D.E. (1974). Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D.E. & Ogilvie, J.C. (1974). Dimensions of perception of paintings. In D.E. Berlyne (ed.), Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics. pp. 181–226. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, J.K. (1981). Physical correlates of the judged complexity of music by subjects differing in musical background. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, J.B. (1974). Verbal and exploratory responses to sound sequences varying in uncertainty level. In D.E. Berlyne (ed.), Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics. pp. 27–90. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J.B. (1978). The Psychology of Music. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, H.I. (1981). Advances in Intrinsic Motiyation and Aesthetics. London: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D.J. & Colman, A.M. (1981). The dimensions of aesthetic reactions to music. Psychology of Music, 9, 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. J., Messerschmidt, P. & Rubert, C. (1980). Musical preference and evaluation. Psychology of Music, 8, 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNemar, Q. (1962). Psychological Statistics. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steck, L. & Machotka, P. (1975). Preference for musical complexity: effects of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 170–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitz, P.C. (1972). Preference for tones as a function of frequency (hertz) and intensity (decibels). Perception and Psychophysics, 11, 84–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E.L. (1981). The quest for the inverted U. In H.I. Day (ed.), Advances in Intrinsic Motivation and Aesthetics. pp. 39–70. London: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, P.A. Relationships between judgements of the complexity, pleasingness and interestingness of music. Current Psychological Research 2, 195–201 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03186760

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03186760

Keywords

Navigation