Skip to main content
Log in

How do women account for failure when they expect success?

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent research suggests that men and women account for failures differently. Competent, self-aware men discount failures; competent, self-aware women accept them. This style of accounting for failure outcomes in achievement has been explored in studies of attribution and, more recently, the expectancies an individual holds regarding the outcome (to fail or succeed). The theories do not predict acceptance of failure by competent, self-aware individuals. The incongruent results have been consequently explained as a sex difference. Closer evaluation of the research, however, indicates that most women expect failure rather than success, and that this is a learned expectation. This study attempted to answer whether an exposure to success experiences would alter this expectancy and, if so, whether women would then discount failures in a self-serving manner as men do. Through a manipulation of success and failure outcomes using anagram tasks, it was demonstrated that, given an expectation to succeed, women did use systematic biased attributions to account for failure. These findings have significant implications for attribution research and for our understanding of women's attitude towards achievement and ability to maintain a sense of well-being when faced with failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Deaux, K. (1976). Sex: a perspective in the attribution process. In J. Harvey, W. J. Ickes and R. Kidd (eds.), New Directions in Attribution Research. Volume 1, pp. 335–352. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. & Farris, E. (1977). Attributing causes for one's own performance: the effects of sex, norms, and outcome. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. & Goetz, T. (1978). Attributions and learned helplessness. In J. Harvey, W. J. Ickes and R. Kidd (eds.), New Directions in Attribution Research. Volume 2, pp. 157–179. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1968). Change in confidence following success or failure as a predictor of subsequent performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 38–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1969). Attribution of responsibility and valence of success and failure in relation to initial confidence and task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L. (1978). Internal attribution for success and high achievement motivation for men and women. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38(11-B), 5645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, T. & Minton, H. (1974). Internal versus external attribution of task performance as a function of locus of control, initial confidence and success-failure outcome. Journal of Personality, 42, 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J., Ickes, W. J. & Kidd, J. (eds.) (1976). New Directions in Attribution Research. Volume 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J., Ickes, W. J. & Kidd, J. (eds.) (1978). New Directions in Attribution Research. Volume 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Sciences Computing Facility, Department of Biomathematics, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (1977). BMDP Biomedical Computer Programs, P-Series 1977. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ickes, W. J. & Layden, M. A. (1978). Attributional styles. In J. Harvey, W. J., Ickes and J. Kidd (eds.), New Directions in Attribution Research. Volume 2, pp. 119–152. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, I. (1973). Relationship between causal attributions and expectancy of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 108–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, R. (1973). The effects of self -esteem and sex on attributions by actors and observers regarding the causes of success and failure. Dissertation Abstracts International, 34(2-A), 863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (Whole No. 609).

  • Ryckman, R. & Sherman, M. (1973). Relationship between self-esteem and internal-external control for men and women. Psychological Reports, 32, 1106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Semkow, VJ.A., McCarrey, M. How do women account for failure when they expect success?. Current Psychological Research 2, 161–170 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03186756

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03186756

Keywords

Navigation