Skip to main content
Log in

Auditory threshold, signal-to-noise ratio and signal detection theory

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of Signal Detection Theory has demonstrated that there is not an auditory threshold at the level supposed by classical psychophysics, but has not disproved the existence of an auditory threshold at a lower level. Following the recommended signal detection theory procedure fairly closely, an experiment obtained evidence either of the existence of a signal-to-noise ratio audi tory threshold, or a nonlinear relationship between stimulus and response which could not be statistically distiguished from such a threshold , Using the same apparatus and subjects, audi tory thresholds were also obtained using the classical method of limits. The acoustic pressure for the classical thresholds was about five times as great as for the signal detection theory method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Corso, J.F. (1963). A theoretico-historical review of the threshold concept. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 356–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engen, T. (1971). Discrimination and detection. In J.W. Kling & L.A. Riggs (eds.), Woodworth and Schlosberg's Experimental Psychology. London: Wethuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, H. (1953). Speech and Hearing in Communication. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D.M. (1976). An Introduction to Hearing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D.M. & Swets, J.A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: WHey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J.E. & Stevens, S.S. (1950). The masking of pure tones and speech by white noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F.N. & Pedhazur, E.J. (1973). Multiple Regression in Behavioural Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathi, B.P. (1968). Introduction to Random Signals and Communication Theory. London: Intertext.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1963). Sensory thresholds and response bias. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 1432–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, A.P.G. & Gross, E.E. (1972). Handbook of Noise Measurement. 7th edition. Concord, MA: General Radio Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. (1970). Information Transrnlssion, Modulation, and Noise. 2nd edition. Tokyo: McGraw-Kogakusha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swets, J.A. (ed.) (1964). Signal Detection and Recognition by Human Observers. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swets, J.A., Tanner, W.P. & Birdsall, T.G. (1961). Decision processes in detection. Psychological Review, 68, 301–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holdstock, L.J. Auditory threshold, signal-to-noise ratio and signal detection theory. Current Psychological Research 2, 129–138 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03186753

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03186753

Keywords

Navigation