Advertisement

Proceedings: Animal Sciences

, Volume 92, Issue 6, pp 453–466 | Cite as

Population ecology ofSchizodactylus monstrosus (Drury) (Orthoptera) along the sand bed of Damodar river, West Bengal, India

  • A K Hazra
  • R S Barman
  • S K Mondal
  • D K Choudhuri
Article

Abstract

The paper deals with the findings on some aspect of ecology ofSchizodactylus monstrosus Drury. Studies on vertical distribution showed that the highest total density was in the 0 to 20 cm depth. Maximum concentration of the species was found in the first horizontal row. Monthly population structure on vertical distribution was also studied. Statistical analysis showed a significant correlation between the relative humidity and the distribution. Biomass of both the sexes and nymphal populated was estimated.

Keywords

Schizodactylus monstrosus sampling unit vertical distribution biomass 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamsen G 1969 Sampling design of population densities in Enchytraeidae (Oligochaeta);Oikos 20 54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellinger P F 1954 Studies of soil fauna with special reference to collembola;Commun. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 583 11–67Google Scholar
  3. Carpentier F 1953 Observation surSchizodactylus monstrosus Dru. (Orthoptera: Gryllacriidoidea);Bull. Ann. Soc. Entomol. De Belgique 89 (VII-VIII) 184–186Google Scholar
  4. Choudhuri D K and Bagh R K 1974 On the sub-social behaviour and cannibalism inSchizodactylus monstrosus (Orthoptera: Schizodactylidae);Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol. 11 569–573Google Scholar
  5. Delvi M R and Pandian T J 1979 Ecological energetics of the grasshopperPoecilocerus pictus in Bangalore fields;Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Anim. Sci.)B88 241–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hale W G 1966 A population study of moorland collembola;Pedobiologia 6 65–99Google Scholar
  7. Healy M J R 1962 Some basic statistical techniques in soil zoology. InProgress in soil zoology (ed) P W Murphy (London: Butterworths) pp.3–91Google Scholar
  8. Khan R and Aziz S A 1973 Influence of different levels of temperature and moisture on the development and hatching of eggs ofOedaleus abruptus Thunberg (Orthoptera: Acrididae)Indian J. Entomol. 35 29–31Google Scholar
  9. Khattar N 1965 External genitalia, post-genital segments and their musculature ofSchizodactylus monstrosus DonAnn. Mag. Nat. Hist. 8 229–242Google Scholar
  10. Khattar N 1972 A description of the adult and the nymphal stages ofSchizodactylus monstrosus (Drury) (Orthoptera);J. Nat. Hist. 6 589–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Poole T B 1961 An ecological study of the collembola in a coniferous forest soil;Pedobiologia 1 113–137Google Scholar
  12. Ragge D R 1957 The tracheation of the nymphal wing pads ofSchizodactylus monstrosus (Drury), with a revised interpretation of the adult venation. (Orthoptera: Schizodactylidae);Proc. Zool. Soc. London 129 Google Scholar
  13. Rentz C and David B 1973 The origins and affinities of the orthoptera of the channel islands and adjacent main land California part I. The genusCnemotettix.Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Science of Philadelphia,125 89–120Google Scholar
  14. Vanhook Jr R I 1970 Energy and nutrient dynamics of spider and Orthopteran populations in a grassland ecosystem;Ecol. Monogr. 41 1–26Google Scholar
  15. Wiegert R G 1965 Energy dynamics of the grasshopper populations in old field and alfalfa field ecosystem;Oikos 16 161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yates F and Finney D J 1942 Statistical problems in field sampling for wireworms;Ann. Appl. Biol. 29 156–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • A K Hazra
    • 1
  • R S Barman
    • 1
  • S K Mondal
    • 1
  • D K Choudhuri
    • 2
  1. 1.Zoological Survey of IndiaCalcuttaIndia
  2. 2.Zoology DepartmentBurdwan UniversityBurdwanIndia

Personalised recommendations