References
[1982] 1 All E.R. 660.
[1981] Ch. 216, [1980] 3 All E.R. 466.
[1980] A.C. 37, [1978] 3 All E.R. 37 and see [1980]Conveyancer 117.
Supra note 1 [1982] 1 All E.R. at 665f.
A specified sum by way of service charge can be rent for the purposes of the Rent Acts, seeProperty Holding Co. Ltd. v. Clark [1948] 1 K.B. 630.
Cf. Hyams v. Titan Properties Ltd. (1972) 24 P. & C.R. 359 (C.A.).
Supra note 1 [1982] 1 All E.R. 660. at 670e,per Lord Wilberforce.
Ibid. [1982] 1 All E.R. at 665c.
Ibid. [1982] 1 All E.R. at 670d.
Ibid. [1982] 1 All E.R. at 671e.
Ibid. [1982] 1 All E.R. at 665e.
[1956] 3 All E.R. 442.
[1971] 2 All E.R. 721.
As were the decisions inCharles Clements (London) Ltd. v. Rank City Wall Ltd. (1978) 246 E.G. 739 andAldwych Club Ltd. v. Copthall Property Co. Ltd. (1962) 185 E.G. 219.
[1956] 3 All E.R. 442, 444.
[1971] 2 All E.R. 721, 726.
Supra note 1 [1982] 1 All E.R. at 665j.
Supra note 3 [1980] A.C. 37, [1978] 3 All E.R. 37 and see [1980]Conveyancer 117. and text at 2.
Ibid. [1980] A.C. 37, [1978] 3 All E.R. 37 and see [1980]Conveyancer 117.
[1982] 1 All E.R. 465, Lawton, Brightman and Oliver L.J.
Ibid. [1982] 1 All E.R. 465, Lawton, Brightman and Oliver L.J. at 466per Oliver L.J., giving the judgment of the court.
Ibid. at 468b.
V. G.Wellings,Woodfalls Law of Landlord and Tenant, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 28th edition, 1978, Vol. 2, para 2-0740.
[1958] 1 All E.R. 104.
Supra note 20 [1982] 1 All E.R. 465, Lawton, Brightman and Oliver L.J. at 470e.
Cf. Leasehold Committee Final Report 1950 (Cmnd. 7982) para. 182.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parry, N.D.M. Renewal of business tenancies. Liverpool Law Rev 4, 174–180 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03185322
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03185322