Skip to main content
Log in

Judge — Made law in the Netherlands

  • Published:
The Liverpool Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Hoge Raad, February 14th 1916, Weekblad van het Recht 9958, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 1916, 618et seq. Contrast this withR. v. Larsonneur (1933), 24 Cr. App. Reps. 74.

  2. TheCohen-Lindenbaum Case, Hoge Raad, January 31st, 1919, Weekblad van het Recht 10365, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 1919, 161.

  3. W.L.P.A. Molengraaff, “De oneerlijke concurrentie voor het forum van den Nedeelandschen rechter”, (Unfair competition before the forum of the Dutch judiciary),Rechtsgeleerd Magazijn (1887), 373;Collected Papers, Zwolle, 1978, 101et seq.

  4. see Lord Denning,The Discipline of Law, London, Butterworths, 1979, 63–101.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoge Raad, November 27th, Rechtspraat van de week, 1981, 157.

  6. See Nederlandse Juristenblad, 1981, 1215.

  7. The problems in this context resemble those which arose inShaw v. D.P.P. [1962] A.C. 220.

  8. Supra TheCohen-Lindenbaum Case, Hoge Raad, January 31st, 1919, Weekblad van het Recht 10365, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 1919, 161. note 6.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Lecture delivered at the Department of Law, Liverpool Polytechnic, on 5th May 1982. The text has been slightly altered for publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulder, G.E. Judge — Made law in the Netherlands. Liverpool Law Rev 4, 105–110 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03185315

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03185315

Keywords

Navigation