References
Hoge Raad, February 14th 1916, Weekblad van het Recht 9958, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 1916, 618et seq. Contrast this withR. v. Larsonneur (1933), 24 Cr. App. Reps. 74.
TheCohen-Lindenbaum Case, Hoge Raad, January 31st, 1919, Weekblad van het Recht 10365, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 1919, 161.
W.L.P.A. Molengraaff, “De oneerlijke concurrentie voor het forum van den Nedeelandschen rechter”, (Unfair competition before the forum of the Dutch judiciary),Rechtsgeleerd Magazijn (1887), 373;Collected Papers, Zwolle, 1978, 101et seq.
see Lord Denning,The Discipline of Law, London, Butterworths, 1979, 63–101.
Hoge Raad, November 27th, Rechtspraat van de week, 1981, 157.
See Nederlandse Juristenblad, 1981, 1215.
The problems in this context resemble those which arose inShaw v. D.P.P. [1962] A.C. 220.
Supra TheCohen-Lindenbaum Case, Hoge Raad, January 31st, 1919, Weekblad van het Recht 10365, Nederlandse Jurisprudentie 1919, 161. note 6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Lecture delivered at the Department of Law, Liverpool Polytechnic, on 5th May 1982. The text has been slightly altered for publication.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mulder, G.E. Judge — Made law in the Netherlands. Liverpool Law Rev 4, 105–110 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03185315
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03185315