Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of two-equation model and reynolds stress models with experimental data for the three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer in a 30 degree bend

  • Thermal Engineering · Fluid Engineering · Energy and Power Engineering
  • Published:
KSME International Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to investigate the pressure-strain correlation terms of the Reynolds stress models for the three dimensional turbulent boundary layer in a 30° bend tunnel. The numerical results obtained by models of Launder, Reece and Rodi (LRR), Fu and Speziale, Sarkar and Gatski (SSG) for the pressure-strain correlation terms are compared against experimental data and the calculated results from the standard k-ε model. The governing equations are discretized by the finite volume method and SIMPLE algorithm is used to calculate the presure field. The results show that the models of LRR and SSG predict the anisotropy of turbulent structure better than the standard k-ε model. Also, the results obtained from the LRR and SSG models are in better agreement with the experimental data than those of the Fu and standard k-ε models with regard to turbulent normal stresses. Nevertheless, LRR and SSG models do not effectively predict pressure-strain redistribution terms in the inner layer because the pressure-strain terms are based on the locally homogeneous approximation. Therefore, to give better predictions of the pressure-strain terms, non-local effects should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradshaw, P. and Terrell, M. G., 1969,The response of a turbulent boundary layer on an infinite swept wing to the sudden removal of pressure gradient, NPL Aero Rep. 1305.

  • Durbin, P. A., 1993,On modeling three-dimensional turbulent wall layers, Phys. Fluids, A, 5 (5).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flack, K. A., and Johnston, J. P., 1993,The near-wall region of a detaching three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer, Int. Conf. On Near-Wall Turbulent Flow, March 15–18, Tempe, Arizona.

  • Fu, S., 1988,Computational modeling of turbulent swirling flows with second-moment closures, Ph. D. Thesis, UMIST, Manchester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, M. M. and Launder, B. E., 1978,Ground effects on pressure fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 86, 491–511.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, S. and Leschziner, M. A., 1989,Secondmomentum-closure claculation of strongly swirling confined with large density gradients. Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 10. No. 1, pp. 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. P., 1970,Measurements in a three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer induced by a swept, forward-facing step, J. Fluids Eng., Vol. 98, pp. 823–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. P., 1994,Near wall flow in a three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer on the end wall of a rectangular bend, AIAA 94-0405.

  • Jones, W. P. and Launder, B. E., 1972,The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence, International Journal of Heat and Mass transfer, vol. 15, pp. 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Launder, B. E., 1986,Low-Reynolds-number turbulence near walls, Rep., TFD/86/4, Dept. of Mech. Eng., UMIST.

  • Launder, B. E. and Spalding, D. B., 1974,The numerical computation of turbulent flow, Computer Method in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol 3, pp. 269–289.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Launder, B. E., Reece, G. J. and Rodi, W., 1975,Progress in the development of a Reynoldsstress turbulence closure, J. Fluid Mech., 68, 537–566.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. A., 1990,Three-dimensional computations of injection into swirling cross-flow using second moment closure, Ph. D. Thesis, UMIST, Manchester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, W. C., 1991,Analytical methods in turbulence, ME261B course, Stanford University.

  • Rotta, J. C., 1979,A family of turbulence models for three-dimensional boundary layers, In Turbulent Shear Flows I Springer-Verlag, New York, 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, W. R. and Bradshaw, P., 1992,Three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer in a 30 degree bend: experiment and modeling, Rept. MD-61, Thermosciences Division, Stanford University.

  • Spalart, P. R., 1988,Direct simulation of a turbulent boundary layer up to Reθ=1410. J. Fluid Mech. Vol. 187, pp. 61–98.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Speziale, C. G., Sarkar, S. and Gatski, T. B., 1991,Modelling the pressure-strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach, J. Fluid Mech., 227, 245–272.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, D. C., 1993,Turbulence Modeling for CFD, DCW Industries Inc., Lacanada California.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Sun Ryou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, I., Ryou, H.S., Lee, S.H. et al. Comparison of two-equation model and reynolds stress models with experimental data for the three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer in a 30 degree bend. KSME International Journal 14, 93–102 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184775

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184775

Key Words

Navigation