Advertisement

Proceedings: Animal Sciences

, Volume 96, Issue 5, pp 629–636 | Cite as

Biosystematics ofCulex vishnui andCulex pseudovishnui based on ecobehavioural pattern

  • A K Hati
  • S Bhattacharya
Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Culex vishnui group consists of 3 species of mosquitoes vizCulex vishnui, Culex pseudovishnui andCulex tritaeniorhynchus. It was found that out of 16 species of mosquitoes collected in 3 years from two different biotopes, 8·28 and 24·89% ofCulex vishnui mosquitoes were collected from human habitations and cowsheds respectively. The corresponding data ofCulex pseudovishnui were 1·80 and 5·66% respectively. Out of 12274 mosquitoes belonging to 17 species collected off man-baits in one year,Culex vishnui constituted 34·6% while the latter species encountered 9·04%. When the collection was made by placing manbaits and cow-baits side by side, the attraction ratio (man:cow) ofCulex vishnui was found to be 1∶1·9 and that ofCulex pseudovishnui was 1∶2·6. Bloodmeal analysis of these two species of mosquitoes revealed thatCulex vishnui was more inclined to human blood (21·5%) than that ofCulex pseudovishnui (16·14%).Culex vishnui andCulex pseudovishnui were both susceptible to DDT, dieldrin and malathion, but the LT50 value was slightly higher in the former species than the latter.Culex vishnui utilised its breeding spots like paddy fields, ponds, ditches and burrow-pits more effectively in almost all the months of a year thanCulex pseudovishnui. The density of the larvae ofCulex pseudovishnui was found to be lower than that ofCulex vishnui. Japanese encephalitis virus was isolated only fromCulex vishnui in West Bengal.

Keywords

Biosystematics Culex vishnui Culex pseudovishnui ecobehavioural pattern 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chakraborty M S, Chakraborty S K, Mukherjee K K, Mitra A C, Mitra K K, Gupta B and Sarkar J K 1980 Recurrent Japanese encephalitis epidemics in West Bengal;Indian J. Med. Res. 72 1–6Google Scholar
  2. Collins R T, Dash B K, Agarwala R S and Dhal K B 1983An adaptation of the Gel diffusion technique for identifying the source of mosquito bloodmeals, WHO Unpublished document, WHO/MAL/83.992 (WHO/VBC/83.873)Google Scholar
  3. Davidson G and Zahar A R 1973 The practical implications of resistance of malaria vectors to insecticides;Bull. WHO 49 475–483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hati A K 1981 Vectors of Japanese encephalitis in India. Their bionomics and control;Bull. Calcutta Sch. Trop. Med. 29 87–88Google Scholar
  5. Hati A K, Ghosh K K, Das S, De N and Sur S 1981A longitudinal study on Phlebotomus argentipes/man contact in a village in West Bengal WHO/VBC/81.801Google Scholar
  6. Holstein M H 1954 Biology ofAnopheles gambiae, WHO Monogr. Series No. 9 (WHO, Geneva)Google Scholar
  7. Ismail I A H and Phinichpongse S 1980Monitoring susceptibility of malaria vectors and suspected vectors to pesticides in Thailand WHO/MAL/80.923; WHO/VBC/80.775Google Scholar
  8. Mahadev P V M, Dhanda V, Geevarghese G, Mishra A C, Deshmukh P K, Kaul H N, Modi G B, Shetty P S, George P J, Guttikar S N and Dhanpal J 1978 Studies on the mosquitoes of Bankura District, West Bengal: adult populations;Indian J. Med. Res. 68 248–263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mayr E 1958 Behaviour and systematics; inBehaviour and evolution, (eds) A Roe and G G Simpson (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press) pp 340–362Google Scholar
  10. Mishra A C, George Jacob P, Ramanujan S, Bhat H R and Pavri K M 1984 Mosquito vectors of Japanese encephalitis epidemic (1983) in Mandya district (India);Indian J. Med. Res. 80 377–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. NIV (National Institute of Virology) 1980Japanese encephalitis in India (Information documents) p 62Google Scholar
  12. Ouchterlony O and Nilson L A 1973 Immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis; inHandbook of Experimental Immunology (ed.) O M Weir (Blackwell) pp 1–99Google Scholar
  13. Rajagopalan P K and Panicker K N 1978 A note on the 1976 epidemic of Japanese encephalitis in Burdwan District, West Bengal;Indian J. Med. Res. 68 393–398Google Scholar
  14. Reuben R 1969 A redescription of the speciesCulex vishnui Theo. with notes onCulex pseudovishnui Colless andCulex tritaeniorhynchus Giles, from Southern India;Bull. Entomol. Res. 58 643–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reuben R 1971 Studies on the mosquitoes of North Arcot District, Madras State, India. 5. Breeding place ofCulex vishnui group of species;J. Med. Entomol. 8 363–366PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Self L S, Nelson M J, Pant C P, Sulianti S J and Usman S 1975Ecological studies on vectors of Malaria, Japanese encephalitis and Filariasis in rural areas of West Java WHO/VBC/75.598Google Scholar
  17. Simpson G G 1969Principles of animal taxonomy (second Indian reprint). (Calcutta: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.)Google Scholar
  18. Soman R S, Kaul H N, Guru P Y, Modi G B, Guttikar S N and Dhanda V 1976 A report on the mosquitoes collected during an epidemic of encephalitis in Burdwan and Bankura Districts, West Bengal;Indian J. Med. Res. 64 808–813PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Soman R S, Kaul H N, Guttikar S N and Rodrigues F M 1980 Ecological observations on mosquitoes in Andhra Pradesh;Indian J. Parasitol. 4 119–126Google Scholar
  20. WHO (expert committee on Insecticides) 1970 Seventeenth Report, Geneva. WHO, TRS. No. 443Google Scholar
  21. WHO 1975Manual on practical entomology in malaria, part II (Methods and techniques) WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • A K Hati
    • 1
  • S Bhattacharya
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical EntomologyCalcutta School of Tropical MedicineCalcuttaIndia

Personalised recommendations