Abstract
Hydrogen bonding contributes of the order of 5–15 kcal/mol base pair to the stability of the helix (electronic or intrinsic energy). This contribution is selective, i.e., there is a preferential stability of the Watson-Crick G-C pair relative to all other pairs. Stacking interactions contribute approximately of the same order as hydrogen bonding. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the stacking interactions which emerges from the theoretical analysis is the fact that the stacking maxima are not necessarily at the angles the successive base pair plans assume in a regular double helix. Consequently some sequence dependent structure peculiarities may arise. That is, the double helix may have a fine structure contingent on the sequence of base pairs. Indeed such sequence dependent polymorphism has been reported in the recent literature and appears to influence the ability of aromatic drugs to intercalate into the helix. The solvent effect which is another factor of stability seems to decrease somewhat bonding scheme preferences. For example, in the model we used to estimate solvent effect, we find that the G-C pair formation is de-stabilized strongly in water, while the A-T pair formation is mildly enhanced. The continuum model of solvent effect leads to similar qualitative conclusions. Studies of backbone conformation indicate that only a limited range of conformational states are comparable with the helical configuration. Improved empirical methods are needed in order to successfully calculate backbone effects for relatively large segments of nucleic acids.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alagona G, Pullman A, Serocco E and Tomasi F 1973Int. J. Peptide Prot. Res. 5 251
Arnott S (1977 in Proceedings of the First Cleveland Symposium on Macromolecules ed. A G Walton (New York: Elsevier) p. 87
Arnott Set al 1974aJ. Mol. Biol. 88 523
Arnott S and Hukins D W L 1973J. Mol. Biol. 81 93
Arnott S and Selsing E 1974aJ. Mol. Biol. 88 551
Arnott S and Selsing E 1974bJ. Mol. Biol. 88 509
Arnott S and Selsing E 1975J. Mol. Biol. 98 265
Berthod H and Pullman A 1965J. Chim. Phys. 62 942
Borer P N, Dengler B, Tinoco I Jr and Uhlenbeck D C 1974J. Mol. Biol. 86 843
Bram S 1971Nature New Biol. 232 174
Bram S 1973Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 702 167
Bram S and Tougard P 1972Nature New Biol. 239 128
Bugg C E, Thomas J M, Sundaralingam M and Rao S T 1971Biopolymers 10 175
Claverie P 1968Molecular Association in Biology ed. B Pullman (New York: Academic Press) p. 115
Clementi Eet al 1969Acta Phys. Acad. Sci. Hung. 27 493
De Voe H and Tinoco I Jr 1962J. Mol. Biol. 4 500
Egan J T, Swissler T J and Rein R 1974Int. J. Quantum Chem: Quant. Biol. Symp. no. 1 71
Fugita H, Imamura A and Nagata C 1974J. Theor. Biol. 45 411
Gibson K D and Scheraga H A 1967Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 58 420
Giessner-Prettre C and Pullman A 1968Theor. Chim. Acta 9 279
Hamlin R M, Lord R C and Rich A 1965Science 148 1734
Katz K and Penman S 1966J. Mol. Biol. 15 220
Krugh T R and Reinhardt C G 1975J. Mol. Biol. 97 133
Kudritskaya V K and Danilov V I 1976J. Theor. Biol. 59 303
Kyoguku Y, Lord R D and Rich A 1966Science 154 518
Mely B and Pullman A 1969Theor. Chim. Acta 13 278
Nash H A and Bradley D F 1966J. Chem. Phys. 45 1380
Ornstein R, Rein R, Breen D and MacElroy R 1978Biopolymers (in press)
Ornstein R 1978 Ph.D Thesis (to appear)
Ornstein R and Rein R 1978Biopolymers (submitted)
Pack G R and Loew G 1977Int. J. Quantum Chem.: Quant. Biol. Symp. (in press)
Pack G R and Loew G 1977Biochim. Biopltys. Acta (submitted)
Poland DC and Scheraga H S 1965Biopolymers 3 315
Polozov R V, Poltev V I and Sukhovukov B I 1975J. Theor. Biol. 55 491
Port G N J and Pullman A 1973Theor. Chim. Acta (Bert.) 31 231
Pullman B and Pullman A 1969Prog. Nucl. Acid. Res. Mol. Biol. 9 257
Pullman B and Saran A 1976Prog. Nue!. Acid. Res. Mol. Biol. 18 215
Rein R 1973Adv. Quant. Chem. 7 335
Rein R 1975NATO Symposium in Quantum Chemistry eds J M Andre and J Ladik (New York: Plenum Press) p. 505
Rein R 1977Perspectives in Quantum Chemistry ed, B Pullman (in press)
Rein R, Coeckelelenbergh Y and Egan J T 1975Int. J. Quant. Chem.: Quant. Biol. Symp. 2 145
Rein Ret al 1969Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 153 805
Rein R and Ornstein R 1978Abstracts of Theoretical Chemistry Symposium, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay 1977 (to appear)
Renugopalakrishnan V, Lakshminarayanan A V and Sasisekharan V 1971Biopolymers 10 1159
Shoup R R, Miles H T and Becker E D 1966Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 23 194
Sinanoglu 0 and Abdulnur S 1964J. Photochem. Photobiol. 3 333
Sobell H, Tsai C C, Jain S C and Gilbert S G 1977J. Mol. Biol. 114 333
Sundaralingam M 1975 inStructure and Conformation of Nucleic Acids and Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions eds M Sundaralingam and S T Rao (Baltimore: Univ. Park Press) p. 487
Tsai C C, Jain S C and Sobell H M 1977J. Mol. Biol. 114 301
Ts’o POP 1970 inFine Structure of Proteins and Nucleic Acids eds G Fasman and Timisheff (New York: Marcel Dekker) p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rein, R., Ornstein, R.L. & Macelroy, R.D. Nucleic acid constituent interactions. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences - Section B 87, 135–145 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03179284
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03179284