Abstract
Reliability refers to the ability of a part, device or system to conduct an intended function in a given condition for a certain period of time. A mechanical system or structure such as a machine tool exercises the capacity of the entire system with regard to the various constituent parts that are connected to each other; as such, the reliability of the parts constituting the system determines the reliability of the entire system. A tool post is a device designed to efficiently provide the tools necessary for the processing of a turning machine: the parts used in a hard turning machine which requires higher stiffness must provide greater reliability. For the purposes of this study, the reliability of a tool post, which has the highest failure rate of a turning machine system, was assessed. In order to conduct a reliability assessment of a given tool post, reliability prediction using a failure rate database, weak point analysis, the manufacture of a reliability tester and the calculation of reliability testing and quantitative reliability criteria were also carried out. By so doing, the failure rate, the MTBF (Mean time between failures) and other factors could be calculated. Furthermore, the results can also be applied to other parts of the turning machine or to a reliability assessment of a subsystem by using the suggested assessment method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bucar, T., Nagode, M. and Fajdiga, 2004. “Relia-bility Approximation Using Finite Weibull Mixture Distributions,”Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 241–251.
Kim, B. S., Lee, S. H., Song, J. Y. and Lee, S. W., 2005, “Reliability Assessment of Machine Tools Using Failure Mode Analysis Programs,”Transaction of the Korean Society of Machine Tool Engineers, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 15–23.
Korean Standards Association, 1992,The Distribution and Statistics of Reliability.
Lee, S. W., Han, S. W., Kim, J. S., Song, J. Y. and Kim, W. D., 2005, “Reliability Prediction of PCB using PRISM,Proceeding of KSME (May), pp. 143–146.
Lee, S. W., Han, S. W., Song, J. Y., Kim, W. D. and Lee, H. K., 2006, “Reliability Evaluation System of Electronics Components,”Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 326, No. 328, pp. 569–572.
Lee, S. W., Lee, H. K. and Shin, D. H, 2006, “Reliability Evaluation of ATC for High-Speed Line Center,”Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 111–118.
Lee, S. W., Song, J. Y. and Lee, H. K., 2003, “A Study on Reliability Evaluation for Core Units for Machine Tools,”Journal of Applied Reliability, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 41–58.
Lee, S. W., Song, J. Y, Hwang. J. H. and Park, H. Y, 2001, “Quality Function Deployment of Core Units for a Reliability Evaluation of Machine Tools,”Proceeding of Korean Society of Precision Engineering (May), pp. 59–62.
Moasoft Inc., 2002,A Guide Book for Reliability Predictions, KyowooSa Press, Seoul, pp. 351–365.
Reliability Analysis Center, 1991,Failure Mode/ Mechanism Distributions.
Reliability Analysis Center, 1995,Non-electric Parts Reliability Document.
Saleh, J. H. and Marais, K., 2006, “Reliability: How Much is it worth? Beyond its Estimation or Prediction, the (net) Present Value of Reliability,”Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 91, No. 6, pp. 665–673.
Song, J. Y, Lee, H. S., Jang, J. S., Jung J. Y. and Ha, S. D., 2005, “Failure Mode and Effect Criticality Analysis,” KyowooSa Press, Seoul, pp. 90–99.
Wang, W., Loman J. M., Arno, R. G., Vassiliou, P., Furlong, E. R. and Ogden, D., 2004, “Reliability Block Diagram Simulation Technique,”IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 887–895.
Wang, Y. and Jia, Y., 1999, “Probabilistic Failure Model of CNC Lathes,”Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 307–314.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, S., Han, S. & Lee, H. Assessment of the tool post reliability of a high-stiffness turning machine. J Mech Sci Technol 21, 1244–1252 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03179041
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03179041