Summary
We propose a new estimator of the variance of the systematic sample mean, which is based on a sum of two components: the first takes into account ofthe trend in the population list, the second takes into account of the stochastic component of a general superpopulation model. Such an estimator is compared with the simple random sampling variance estimator and the estimator based on overlapping differences, both theoretically and empirically. The comparison shows that for many superpopulation models, the proposed estimator outperforms the other two.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cicchtelli, G., Herzel, A., Montanari, G. E. (1997),Il campionamento statistico. Bologna: il Mulino.
Iachan, R. (1982), Systematic sampling: a critical review.International Statistical Review, 50, pp. 293–303.
Kish, L. (1965),Survey Sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Wolter, K. M. (1984), An Investigation of Some Estimators of Variance for Systematic Sampling.Journal ofthe American Statistical Association, 79, pp. 781–790.
Wolter, K. M. (1985),Introduction to Variance Estimation. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Montanari, G.E., Bartolucci, F. On estimating the variance of the systematic sample mean. J. Ital. Statist. Soc. 7, 185–196 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178928
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178928