Effects of collimator backscatter in an Elekta linac by Monte Carlo simulation

  • T. KairnEmail author
  • S. B. Crowe
  • C. M. Poole
  • A. L. Fielding
Scientific Papers


The effects of radiation backscattered from the secondary collimators into the monitor chamber in an Elekta linac (producing 6 and 10 MV photon beams) are investigated using BEAMnrc Monte Carlo simulations. The degree and effects of this backscattered radiation are assessed by evaluating the changes to the calculated dose in the monitor chamber, and by determining a correction factor for those changes. Additionally, the fluence and energy characteristics of particles entering the monitor chamber from the downstream direction are evaluated by examining BEAMnrc phase-space data. It is shown that the proportion of particles backscattered into the monitor chamber is small (<0.35 %), for all field sizes studied. However, when the backscatter plate is removed from the model linac, these backscattered particles generate a noticeable increase in dose to the monitor chamber (up to ≈2.4 % for the 6 MV beam and up to 4.4 % for the 10 MV beam). With its backscatter plate in place, the Elekta linac (operating at 6 and 10 MV) is subject to negligible variation of monitor chamber dose with field size.

At these energies, output variations in photon beams produced by the clinical Elekta linear accelerator can be attributed to head scatter alone. Corrections for field-size-dependence of monitor chamber dose are not necessary when running Monte Carlo simulations of the Elekta linac operating at 6 and 10 MV.

Key words

linear accelerator Monte Carlo dose calculation radiation therapy scatter 


  1. 1.
    Verhaegen, F. and Seuntjens, J.,Monte Carlo modelling of external radiotherapy photon beams, Phys. Med. Biol. 48:R107-R164, 2003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ravikumar, M. and Ravichandran, R.,Measurement of backscattered radiation from secondary collimator jaws into the beam monitor chamber from a dual energy linear accelerator, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 12:670–675, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hounsell, A. R.,Monitor chamber backscatter for intensity modulated radiation therapy using multileaf collimators, Phys. Med. Biol. 43:445–454, 1998.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, H. H., Mackie, T. R. and McCullough, E. C.,Modeling photon output caused by backscattered radiation into the monitor chamber from collimator jaws using a Monte Carlo technique, Med. Phys. 27(4):737–744, 2000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang, P. H., Chu, J. and Bjarngard, B. E.,The effect of collimator backscatter radiation on photon output of linear accelerators, Med. Phys. 14(2):268–269, 1987.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paelinck, L., de Wagter, C., van Esch, A., Duthoy, W., Depuydt, T. and de Neve, W.,Comparison of build-up dose between Elekta and Varian linear accelerators for highenergy photon beams using radiochromic film and clinical implications for IMRT head and neck treatments, Phys. Med. Biol. 50:413–428, 2005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sanz, D. E., Alvarez, G. D. and Nelli, F. E.,Ecliptic method for the determination of backscatter into the beam monitor chambers in photon beams of medical accelerators, Phys. Med. Biol. 52:1647–1658, 2007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhu, T. C., Bjarngard, B. E., Xiao, Y. and Bieda, M.,Output ratio in air for MLC shaped irregular fields, Med. Phys. 31(9):2480–2490, 2004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verhaegen, F., Symonds-Tayler, R., Liu, H. H. and Nahum, A. E.,Backscatter towards the monitor ion chamber in highenergy photon and electron beams: charge integration versus Monte Carlo simulation, Phys. Med. Biol. 45:3159–3170, 2000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rogers, D. W. O., Faddegon, B. A., Ding, G. X., Ma, C. M., We, J. and Mackie, T. R.,BEAM: A Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units, Med. Phys. 22(5):503–524, 1995.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sheikh-Bagheri, D. and Rogers, D. W. O.,Monte Carlo calculation of nine megavoltage photon beam spectra using BEAM code, Med. Phys. 29(3):391–402, 2002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kawrakow, I. and Walters, B. R. B.,Efficient photon beam dose calculations using DOSXYZnrc with BEAMnrc, Med. Phys. 33(8):3046–3056, 2006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rogers, D. W. O., Walters, B. and Kawrakow, I.BEAMnrc Users Manual, Ionising Radiation Standards, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kairn, T., Cassidy, D., Sandford, P. M. and Fielding, A. L.,Radiotherapy treatment verification using radiological thickness measured with an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device: Monte Carlo simulation and experiment, Phys. Med. Biol. 53(14):3903–3919, 2008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Popescu, I. A., Shaw, C. P., Zavgorodni, S. F. and Beckham, W. A.,Absolute dose calculations for Monte Carlo simulations of radiotherapy beams, Phys. Med. Biol. 50:3375–3392, 2005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Kairn
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. B. Crowe
    • 1
  • C. M. Poole
    • 1
  • A. L. Fielding
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Physical and Chemical SciencesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations